There is a universe of difference between scientists around 150 years ago putting forward a theory based on best available evidence, as in the case of the aether, and a group of fantasy driven flat earth clowns proposing something so preposterous and obviously unscientific.
There is no comparison between the two. To say there is is madness in itself.
To say there is no comparison is madness itself.
As soon as more evidence came available science moved on as it is driven by the best facts and evidence available.
No it didn't.
Plenty clung to the aether, even after it needed so many insane things, and there was evidence showing it doesn't work.
But the most important part of the comparison is still valid.
In these cases, data existed which lead to the creation of a model which doesn't match reality.
i.e. being wrong is not enough to preclude the possibility of data existing which can be used to construct a model, it doesn't preclude the possibility of a model existing.
What this shows is you have not the slightest understanding of anything being totally blinded by your own bigotry and your ‘I have to be right and to hell with the truth’ way of non thinking.
The fact that you have been obviously wrong on everything you have been claiming shines a bright light on your dishonesty and inability to accept the truth.
You sure do love your projection don't you?
You say:-
“The images have no bearing on the argument.”
That’s a lie only you believe!
No, that is not a lie.
The argument is not if Earth is flat or round.
The argument is about if there can be a FE model.
Showing that Earth is flat does not preclude the possibility of a FE model.
Just like demonstrating that Bohr's model of the atom is wrong doesn't preclude the possibility of it being a model.
Just like demonstrating that the aether doesn't exist doesn't preclude the possibility of scientific models existing which use aether.
As such, this has no bearing on the argument.
If I was claiming that Earth is flat, rather than just objecting to your BS claim that there can't be FE models, then it would have bearing. But that is not the case.
If instead you were claiming that a model must be true, and all these outdated beliefs from science are not models because they aren't true, then it would have bearing. But that is not the case either.
It reveals no strawman
You are blatantly lying when you claim I am rejecting the truth, with your dishonest implication that I think Earth is flat.
You are setting up a strawman, where you pretend I think Earth is flat, for you to defeat by providing evidence that Earth isn't flat.
But that has never been my claim or my argument.
You continue to claim:-
“Flat earth has “PLENTY REAL FLAT EARTH DATA” and “There can be a scientific FE model"
And you know what the evidence is, you are unable to show a single fault with it, nor can you actually justify the BS you have spouted which lead to those statements.
Instead you just deflect, setting up pathetic strawmen to knock down.
I have challenged you on numerous occasions to present YOUR PLENTY REAL FLAT EARTH DATA” and YOU HAVE FAILED TO PRODUCE A SINGLE SHRED!
And I presented it numerous times, and you just ignored it, repeatedly, and instead just continue to spout this pathetic lie.
I have challenged you
And given that I had met your challenge to provide the data, and you just dishoenstly pretend it doesn't exist, I see no reason to try performing any more tricks for you.
Deal with the challenged which have already been met before demanding more.
Conversely, you have been challenged to provide a coherent, consistent set of requirements something must meet in order to be deemed a model, which can then be applied to the products of the idols you worship; and you have continually deflecting, never providing this because you know it will defeat you by exposing your dishonest double standard.
Either the prodcuts of your idols will fail which you can never allow, or the FE can pass, which you can never allow.
The simple fact that you call a lie is that the world has been known to be a sphere for 2000 years. True or false?
FALSE!
If you wish to claim such pure BS, then provide a direct quote to justify it.
And regardless, yet again, this is a pathetic deflection and a strawman.
Try sticking to the topic.
Instead of focusing on if Earth is flat or round, instead focus on if there can be FE models.
If you think this lie is a truth then present the evidence. Whats stopping you?
I have. If you think I haven't, then explain why, making sure you are responding to what I have said, rather than your pathetic lie that it doesn't exist.
Stop the continual lying and distortions and back up your claim with evidence.
And more pathteic projection.
How about you follow your own advice, and provide a coherent, consistent set of requirements for something to meet to be deemed a model which can then be applied to the products of those you worship.
Either way, stop lying by falsely claiming that I have indicated Earth is flat.
Stop lying by falsely claiming I reject science.
Stop lying by falsely claiming I haven't provided data.
All that does is show your dishonesty and show how pathetic your position is.