dyno, when you post a picture, you need to tell the distance involved, there was no such thing in your message.
Is it 10 km? 15 km? Did you specify the curvature involved?
There is no need to resort to bending light; which is not an argument to be used in our discussions, with bending light you could accomplish lots of things, which might have alternative explanations.
Let me prove to you the Earth is flat, without bending light.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/j-a-x/129240474/The roof top of the Sky Dome visible (well intended round earth supporters brought to our attention that the height of the Sky Dome is actually 90 meters, and not 86; at least 5 meters of the roof is visible, that would bring it back right to about 86, but we will use here a value of 90 meters).
Even with atmospheric reffraction (which is absent in this photograph) we might substract a few meters, there would still be about 50-55 meters remaining which cannot be explained on a round earth.
The photographer was on the beach at St. Catharines (50 km distance from Toronto), curvature of 49.5 meters, from a height of 2 meters you could not see anything under 158 meters, from 3 meters nothing could be seen under 150.5 meters.
Here is the beach in St. Catharines:
http://valdodge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/pirate-ship-5137.jpg(already we can see the top of the CN Tower, due to the fact we are using a poor quality camera)
http://valdodge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/mirage-across-the-lake-5112.jpg(with a better camera, more details become available, confirming the theory described in Earth is not a Globe, WITHOUT resorting to bending light)
There is a difference of 60 meters between the accepted round earth measure of 150.5 meters (under which you could see nothing), and the visible portion of the top of the Sky Dome...Note that I have used a 50 km distance (actually 52-53 km) and a 3 meter height for the photographer (actually 2).
Here is a panorama of the Toronto skyline:
http://www.vignetted.com/images/200705/20070510_sm.jpghttp://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/1351778/2/istockphoto_1351778_toronto_skyline.jpghttp://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/images/wallpapers/Toronto-Skyline.jpgNow another three photograph section, in which we see the theory written by Rowbotham, once again, confirmed:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/j-a-x/129240474/ (visible roof top of the Sky Dome, 60 meters difference between the accepted value of 150.5 meters, and the height of 90 meters)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/j-a-x/83867796/ (better camera, better picture, with more details)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/j-a-x/150629243/If we imagine Toronto as a gigantic ship, with the CN Tower as its masthead, we get a complete confirmation of the theory in:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za32.htm