The word fetus is the stage between the embryonic stage and birth, so therefor as far as your concerned, as long as a baby isn't born, it is not a baby since it is still a fetus.
It's not as far as I'm concerned, it is as far as the factual definition is concerned. You don't like it, take it up with doctors.
You must hang out with the same people who think that delivering a baby feet first up to the "fetus'" nose and sticking a needle into its skull to "destroy the fetus". That way they can say that although it was late term it isn't a baby because it was never fully delivered. You might wanna study up on the subject before you start talking so stupid.
Apparently you don't get what attached means.
Um, yah, the options are all available to the mother except for but the only one the pro-choice people are fighting for is the choice to have an abortion, I don't hear any Pro-Choice people running around yelling I'm pro-Choice and I thing women need be able to choose to give their baby up for adoption. No they are all fighting for the right to abort. That is a fact. so again, they should at least change the name to pro-abortion because the choice part is bs.
What the hell are you talking about? You can't just omit things to make your argument sound better. Pro-choice is a choice for
all options. If a mother wants to have the baby and keep it, abort, or deliver and give it up once it's born, those are all part of pro-choice. Hell, she can decide to kill herself if she wants to, SHE HAS THAT CHOICE. What you are advocating is oppression.
Saying this other crap about being pro-abortion is just stupid; please show me some proof that people have berated mothers for having children and claimed to be pro-choice. I'd love to see that illogical mess.
What about the rights of the baby?
Fetus. And it can have rights once it is it's own entity separate of the mother.
wow that was easy, and forcing unwanted pregnancies upon people is quite far from trying to force people to buy something or how to spend their time.
Well, it's worse in my book, seeing as buying things and most hobbies or activities don't cause pain and other problems for the person. So, you like the idea of putting someone through pain and discomfort, all for the sake of another being on the planet, versus abolishing that being that can't think, see, feel or choose something?
As is common, your logic applies to all eggs and sperm. Why not attack people that practice safe sex? You're pro-life, you should want to preserve all potential life, just like a fetus.
Then I guess we should just make it legal for people to randomly shoot people on the street because it isn't far from forcing what people should buy something or spend their time.
You're confusing rights with law and order (or at least the attempt). Almost anyone (barring physical or mental ailments) has the ability to kill someone; that is their right. They choose not to do so due to a variety of factors. They either believe it's wrong, or they simply don't want to burden themselves by either dying or going to jail for life. Abortion is no different.
Again, pro-choice is for all options. If you don't believe in pro-choice, I'd like you to follow my strict guidelines of what to eat, drink and say. Better yet, move to China.
Still waiting for something accurate other then simple ramblings of liberal opinions. Not Facts
Scientific definition is a fact, why ignore it? Also, I'm not a liberal; I simply use definitions and facts to make conclusions and choices.