The article says that NASA is involved. Therefore the data received from the Ice Wall balloon should not be trusted, if it even exists at all
Any evidence that we shouldn't trust your statements? ... Yep. How goes documenting that lie about seeing from one side from 18" above the water across that bay to the waterline on the other side? No where. Huh? I wonder why you'd think we'd trust you more than NASA.
Oh and remember, every time you need to invoke "conspiracy" to explain away an observation, RE wins another round!