1

Flat Earth Debate / Just after FE's take on this

« on: September 21, 2008, 04:15:09 PM »

Just after FE's take on this

"Explanation: Here is what the Earth looks like during a solar eclipse. The shadow of the Moon can be seen darkening part of Earth. This shadow moved across the Earth at nearly 2000 kilometers per hour. Only observers near the center of the dark circle see a total solar eclipse - others see a partial eclipse where only part of the Sun appears blocked by the Moon. This spectacular picture of the 1999 August 11 solar eclipse was one of the last ever taken from the Mir space station, which was deorbited in a controlled re-entry in 2001. "

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040926.html

I'd be dissapointed in a "Photo Shop" blanket dissmissal.

Brett

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Green Peace

« on: June 03, 2007, 12:16:42 AM »

http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/climate/polartour/pt01.html

Reading about Melting glaciers and ice shelves (a word that is takes on a different meaning here), came across this site.

So Greenpeace is in on the conspiracy?

3

Flat Earth Q&A / South Pole

« on: June 01, 2007, 04:55:51 PM »

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=15742

Seems all the scientists involved are fools or in on the conspiracy.

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Strange but True: Earth Is Not Round

« on: April 29, 2007, 03:18:49 AM »

Strange but True: Earth Is Not Round
From http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa029&articleID=6C7D1C56-E7F2-99DF-34B1394F8ABE2BBE

Couldn't resist it
 

5

Flat Earth Q&A / Antarctica

« on: April 24, 2007, 02:13:33 AM »

Just wondering how FEers explain the claims of people who profess to have circumnavigated Antarctica .

There would be a) substancial discrepancy in the distance traveled.
                     b) Instead of veering starboard they were veering port (or visa versa)
                     c) There were some other things cant think of them just yet but they seem like big differences

6

Flat Earth Q&A / How long?

« on: April 14, 2007, 07:09:25 PM »

In FE theory how long has the Earth been accelerating at 9.8m/s²?

7

Flat Earth Q&A / Tides

« on: April 14, 2007, 12:46:04 AM »

If the Earths Oceanic tides are caused by the Earth's "wobbles"

To what degree does the Earth wobble?
What causes it?
What is the wobble frequency?
How is this used predictively to forecast tides ?
What evidence is there of these wobbles (please don't say tides)

8

Flat Earth Q&A / UA

« on: April 13, 2007, 11:35:14 PM »

Why does the UA accelerate the Earth but not us?

9

Flat Earth Q&A / Flat disk

« on: April 12, 2007, 09:57:00 AM »

>>>A matter of physics. In the Earth's early life it went through extreme rotational force and sheering. This gave the Earth its flat disk shape.<<<



I'm quoting Tom from another thread here,
My question:
What direct evidence do you have of this "extreme rotational force and sheering."?
Has it stopped?
What stopped it?
What started it?
Remember angular momentum must be conserved in some way.

Anecdotal evidence not withstanding.

10

Flat Earth Q&A / Earth thickness

« on: April 08, 2007, 09:29:06 PM »

In Flat Earth theory how thick or "deep" is the Earth?

11

Flat Earth Q&A / "Earthhrise"

« on: March 14, 2007, 03:16:31 AM »

http://www.heritageflight.org/info_&_Gen_Pages/Earthrise.htm

Always found this image very beautiful.


How do FEers explain the curved shadow?

12

Flat Earth Q&A / Light

« on: March 12, 2007, 02:23:35 AM »

Hello all,
I have read your FAQ's but not read the suggested book.I do have a few questions though.

It would appear that if "mainstream " science is mistaken with the conclusions it has drawn from astronomical observations that its understanding of light and in particular micro wave radiation  is fundamentally flawed.

I am interested in your explanation of the following observations:
1)Precession of the perihelion of Mercury
2)The Micro Wave background Radiation readings
3)Red and Blue shift of observed galaxies

Most importantly:
4)Your conclusions on the classic "Two slit " light experiment.

Sorry if you would rather these Q's in individual threads but they all relate to the inherent nature of observed physical phenomena.Of particular interest is testable theory with the maths please.

Thomo