No I am not.
I quoted the source.
Yes, you are.
The source you quoted is about orbital path of a satellite.
Then I asked:
"Then satellite will not fall to the ground after all?
And on circular orbit tangential speed will not change?"
And you answer was negative.
You are claiming that satellite WILL fall to the ground, which is denying orbital path,
and you are still trying to use principles of that very denied orbital path as some "proof".
There is no other "force," acting on a satellite.
I'm not here to repeat any dogma.
Same as I don't accept pure belief in Flat earth (I need knowledge), I also
don't accept pure belief in mainstream science (I need knowledge as well).
There is NOTHING that I follow BLINDLY.
It especially goes for popularization articles.
I could use them as an illustration, but for that I have to agree with them.
The question I will ask you is simple enough.
We can skip other people and their examples.
According to Law of Action and Reaction ("
Every force has ..." etc.),
and if gravitational force is action,
what is reaction?
(Hint: what force would tear apart helicopter propeller, or steam machine flywheel, or rotor of electric motor, if there's material flaw, or if it spins too fast?)