1
Flat Earth General / Re: Theoretically, where would be the best place to hide the truth?
« on: October 20, 2017, 07:37:33 PM »
wallszreet where izs now duh
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Flat Earth General / Re: Gravity.
« on: May 13, 2017, 07:16:42 PM »we are looking at space from ant perspecive its logical that its unlogical to usthey ised the wrong material there i guess darkatter is like God than??gravity is a force wich vacum of space aplies to air bouble around earth, workes on every model
It works when you make up fake particles to make it work, sure. If you don't see that then you're simply ignorant and I can't help you. Help yourself and do some research. Dark Matter is the biggest farce in science. Followers of gravity are as bad as religious zealots.
Here you go.
And here.
The assertion in the latter link states that life would not exist at all without dark matter, coupled with the fact that it has never been observed/tested/proven - that's a HUGE discrepancy in Round Earth theory. Obviously your Earth theory is flawed because I'm alive and dark matter doesn't exist. Go back to the drawing board and stop sucking the massive schlong of pseudo-scientific nonsense.
They'll tell you dark matter is a place holder for a mathematical discrepancy present within the modern theory of gravity, what that actually means: they're dead wrong.
3
Flat Earth General / Re: Gravity.
« on: May 13, 2017, 07:11:34 PM »they ised the wrong material there i guess darkatter is like God than??gravity is a force wich vacum of space aplies to air bouble around earth, workes on every model
It works when you make up fake particles to make it work, sure. If you don't see that then you're simply ignorant and I can't help you. Help yourself and do some research. Dark Matter is the biggest farce in science. Followers of gravity are as bad as religious zealots.
Here you go.
And here.
The assertion in the latter link states that life would not exist at all without dark matter, coupled with the fact that it has never been observed/tested/proven - that's a HUGE discrepancy in Round Earth theory. Obviously your Earth theory is flawed because I'm alive and dark matter doesn't exist. Go back to the drawing board and stop sucking the massive schlong of pseudo-scientific nonsense.
4
Flat Earth General / Re: Gravity.
« on: May 13, 2017, 06:58:35 PM »
gravity is a force wich vacum of space aplies to air bouble around earth, workes on every model
5
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 10, 2017, 12:11:07 PM »english aint my native i learned it mostly off movies i dont know a single grammar rule but if that offends u please dont read it do us both a favour and skipp this topic.im sorry but i do not understand what is 90 text speak.Lets start with why u think u need to use 90s text speak to communicate?can we start of something u write what is confusing and why it is so and all try to explain it.i did f up the sun, sun shuld be at 5h and banding twords middle, what are u unclear on??All of it.Textspeak
The process of shortening words and adding numbers to a text message, to make it "cooler". This form of text messaging is highly annoying and can also be used to sell "trendy" products like 50cc scooters and mobile phones. Often involves leaving out all vowels.
1) Txtspk is sooooo cool
2) -RU cmin out 2nite?
-Yeah luv 2 m8, wot time?
-bout 8ish. mt u in twn
-gr8. cu then
3) Only 13 year olds use textspeak
6
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 09, 2017, 11:41:23 AM »Select the section of BB code that is between image tags.thx i tryed the mona lisa one.
7
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 09, 2017, 11:40:09 AM »im sorry but i do not understand what is 90 text speak.Lets start with why u think u need to use 90s text speak to communicate?can we start of something u write what is confusing and why it is so and all try to explain it.i did f up the sun, sun shuld be at 5h and banding twords middle, what are u unclear on??All of it.
8
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 09, 2017, 11:37:33 AM »Let's start with why all the untrimmed pubes?light needs to bend becouse the sunrise and sundown wuld look the same and the pubes and angeles of bend are sharp becouse its a scetch not 100% accurate and the moon i havent rly tought abouth that have to think on that one
Why is the light bending? Why does the angle change so sharply near the center of the diagram? Why doesn't light from other objects bend when they spin around, like flashlights? Does the moon not have its own light in this model? And regardless, does light from the moon (or reflecting off the moon) not also bend?
9
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 08, 2017, 05:28:02 PM »can we start of something u write what is confusing and why it is so and all try to explain it.i did f up the sun, sun shuld be at 5h and banding twords middle, what are u unclear on??All of it.
10
Flat Earth General / Re: Theories
« on: May 08, 2017, 06:54:46 AM »
we live in earth favorite but globe untill proved differently
11
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 08, 2017, 06:52:07 AM »
i did f up the sun, sun shuld be at 5h and banding twords middle, what are u unclear on??
12
Flat Earth General / Re: a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 07, 2017, 03:59:29 PM »
https://ibb.co/jOBiMQ i have no idea if i inserted the immage or not XD
13
Flat Earth General / a gift (only if it works)
« on: May 07, 2017, 03:58:35 PM »
sun is further away on infinite plain so far away that the light bends by the time it reaches earth. when sun and moon are closest thats when winter happens and when they are opposite of each other thats when its summer(as sun is able to get closer to the earth) also sun is rotating inwards and moon outwards like to magnets keeping themselfs on distance. also this teory has no explanation for stars and stuff so the space is not negated well its not in traditional way but its there above the plane. i think thats abouth it, keeping finngers crossed so u FE can finaly have a map. gl 
14
Flat Earth General / Re: Dinosaurs Are A Hoax
« on: April 08, 2017, 07:51:05 PM »
this again?? u had one a month ago or 2
15
Flat Earth General / Re: "You are sheep brainwashed by NASA"
« on: April 05, 2017, 04:00:08 PM »u cant feel 600 mph on a plane coz ur in a plane out of it u rly shuld feal ittake a bike and drive it 100kmph with no helmet or googles and tell me can u feal it?? do take caspeedz your eyesight will be rly blury at that speed, and u cant feel 600mph in a plane coz ur IN a plane, and for the turning part thats just objects unwillingnes to change direction..
But what is the main point of your statement? Why are trying to conclude?
16
Flat Earth General / Re: "You are sheep brainwashed by NASA"
« on: April 04, 2017, 06:24:05 AM »what rpm has with anything 1k mph is 1k mph at fixed point...Plenty!
I can hardly sense the motion of a plane travelling at 620 mph (near enough to 1000 km/hr) in a straight line.
If it turns so that it takes:
30 minutes to do a complete 360° circle I would feel a noticeable side-force of one tenth of my weight.
But if the full turn takes only:
3 minutes to do a complete 360° circle I would feel a very considerable side-force equal to my weight.(if my sums are correct
The surface of the Globe (at the equator!) might be moving at 1000 mph (closer to 1038 mph),
but that is only about 0.0007 rpm, and completely imperceptible.
Movement in a straight line is quite imperceptible, and cannot even be measured without reference to some other object.
Movement around a circle does require a force to make us move in a circle - called the centripetal force.
If that is large enough we could sense it.
It is the combination of the speed any the radius that matter.
take a bike and drive it 100kmph with no helmet or googles and tell me can u feal it?? do take caspeedz your eyesight will be rly blury at that speed, and u cant feel 600mph in a plane coz ur IN a plane, and for the turning part thats just objects unwillingnes to change direction..what rpm has with anything 1k mph is 1k mph at fixed point...Plenty!
I can hardly sense the motion of a plane travelling at 620 mph (near enough to 1000 km/hr) in a straight line.
If it turns so that it takes:
30 minutes to do a complete 360° circle I would feel a noticeable side-force of one tenth of my weight.
But if the full turn takes only:
3 minutes to do a complete 360° circle I would feel a very considerable side-force equal to my weight.(
The surface of the Globe (at the equator!) might be moving at 1000 mph (closer to 1038 mph),
but that is only about 0.0007 rpm, and completely imperceptible.
Movement in a straight line is quite imperceptible, and cannot even be measured without reference to some other object.
Movement around a circle does require a force to make us move in a circle - called the centripetal force.
If that is large enough we could sense it.
It is the combination of the speed any the radius that matter.
17
Flat Earth General / Re: "You are sheep brainwashed by NASA"
« on: April 02, 2017, 06:37:29 PM »
what rpm has with anything 1k mph is 1k mph at fixed point...
18
Flat Earth General / Re: Satellites - for or against - where is the proof - Someone please help here
« on: March 12, 2017, 11:14:47 AM »
well i think first cellphomes ran on satelites atleast that what i seen movies...
19
Flat Earth General / Re: EPIC
« on: March 11, 2017, 06:11:17 AM »that just lools like a bad animationrab my friend have u seen those imiges?He like to oretend they are real.
20
Flat Earth General / Re: EPIC
« on: March 11, 2017, 04:48:20 AM »
rab my friend have u seen those imiges?
22
Flat Earth General / Re: Why did NASA let Nazis run their program?
« on: March 11, 2017, 03:32:27 AM »
nazies didnt run space program nazi tehnology and scientist were stolen by sssr and america thats the whole truth for scientists it was the choise buld more roxkets for new masters or spend life in prison or posibly die it showed full hipocracy of allies nothing more or less....
23
Flat Earth General / Re: A Simple Question About Apollo 10 & 11
« on: March 10, 2017, 07:45:53 AM »who needs spelling any way im not native english speaker as long as other humans understand me it fine by my standardsThey probably are, but in the mean time you should start looking into a spell checker.well nasa has lots of cash they shuld start lookinv in to itProbably because there aren't any known ways of cancelling gravity.no i mean if solar sistem is moving at xxxx light years why not t harvest that speed by canceling gravity??? if u get methey say its gravity but if thats the case im wonder why they waste money on engines why they dont use that for something that will cancel out gravity....
You mean...like a rocket engine?
24
Flat Earth General / Re: A Simple Question About Apollo 10 & 11
« on: March 10, 2017, 06:29:13 AM »well nasa has lots of cash they shuld start lookinv in to itProbably because there aren't any known ways of cancelling gravity.no i mean if solar sistem is moving at xxxx light years why not t harvest that speed by canceling gravity??? if u get methey say its gravity but if thats the case im wonder why they waste money on engines why they dont use that for something that will cancel out gravity....
You mean...like a rocket engine?
25
Flat Earth General / Re: A Simple Question About Apollo 10 & 11
« on: March 10, 2017, 06:17:58 AM »no i mean if solar sistem is moving at xxxx light years why not t harvest that speed by canceling gravity??? if u get methey say its gravity but if thats the case im wonder why they waste money on engines why they dont use that for something that will cancel out gravity....
You mean...like a rocket engine?
26
Flat Earth General / Re: A Simple Question About Apollo 10 & 11
« on: March 10, 2017, 06:10:07 AM »
they say its gravity but if thats the case im wonder why they waste money on engines why they dont use that for something that will cancel out gravity....
27
Flat Earth General / Re: Nothing can pierce the sky and the earth
« on: March 03, 2017, 10:16:03 AM »i kinda little skipped trugh it and i got one thing to say wudnt antartica be a perfect location to test the light show??got it many things but what the things do??wait so its not a poject?? hm and what does this thing do??man i dont demand anything all i asked if u can tell in short u dont have tu if u wont... becouae in order to understand i need arguments and counter arguments and thats a lot of pages to readi seen that blue beam on forum but im not reading xxxxx pages so what is it??
Incredible... You refuse to read about it. You demand some one write about it.
OK, let's start out slowly for you . . . project Blue Beam is a thing.
Do you understand so far? I don't want to get out too far ahead of you.
Any questions yet?
Things. OK so far? Any questions?
Get off your lazy ass and read the thread.
28
Flat Earth General / Re: Nothing can pierce the sky and the earth
« on: March 02, 2017, 05:05:46 PM »XDgot it many things but what the things do??wait so its not a poject?? hm and what does this thing do??man i dont demand anything all i asked if u can tell in short u dont have tu if u wont... becouae in order to understand i need arguments and counter arguments and thats a lot of pages to readi seen that blue beam on forum but im not reading xxxxx pages so what is it??
Incredible... You refuse to read about it. You demand some one write about it.
OK, let's start out slowly for you . . . project Blue Beam is a thing.
Do you understand so far? I don't want to get out too far ahead of you.
Any questions yet?
Things. OK so far? Any questions?
Get off your lazy ass and read the thread.
29
Flat Earth General / Re: The Sun & Oxygen
« on: March 02, 2017, 10:07:37 AM »ok on atomic level i knew it was something microscopiceaven if its not a spotlight it wuld not burn the oxigen coz the sun is burning or molecular level not by combustion
Bonus points for being pretty close.
(google: fusion)
30
Flat Earth General / Re: The Sun & Oxygen
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:48:02 AM »
eaven if its not a spotlight it wuld not burn the oxigen coz the sun is burning or molecular level not by combustion