1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The sun isn't yellow, it's chicken!!
« on: June 02, 2008, 04:14:27 AM »
haha lol, how long did it take you to realise the truth? and make this thread?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: question
« on: June 02, 2008, 04:03:57 AM »Read the Faq noob1. it's not evidence
2. shove it up your ass F wit and go get a life isntead of pretending the earth is flat over the internet.
Quote
It's been set up by people who are quite clearly smart and adept at writing, by the looks of it, at a university level and also -given the popularity of the theory that the earth is supported on the backs of 4 elephants standing on a giant turtle - more than a few Terry Pratchett fans.
more than enough said
3
Flat Earth Debate / Re: THE EARTH ISN'T FLAT, BUT MARS IS!!
« on: June 02, 2008, 03:56:19 AM »
cake
4
Flat Earth Q&A / proof thi swebsite is a joke
« on: June 01, 2008, 10:34:42 PM »
Proof this website is fake and a joke.
http://theflatmarssociety.co.nr/
Nuff said. A few of the members here are on that site too.
I might become a fe'r for the fun of it...oh wait, I'm not a cock head.
http://theflatmarssociety.co.nr/
Nuff said. A few of the members here are on that site too.
I might become a fe'r for the fun of it...oh wait, I'm not a cock head.
5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Fe'rs fail
« on: May 31, 2008, 09:44:20 PM »QuoteBut how can I "fail more" If I'm not the one that belives the earth is flat?
You fail because you believe in something you cannot see and have never tested for yourself. Much like a man of religion.
you, sir, are a faggot.
do you have any friends outside of the internet that arent fe'rs...?
6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Fe'rs fail
« on: May 31, 2008, 09:40:35 PM »Turkey sandwich was locked because it did not relate to FE.
Shaved llama had been done manyh times and was pointless.
I did not lock either of the threads.
Fail more.
yep whatever,
But how can I "fail more" If I'm not the one that belives the earth is flat?
oh, and "manyh" is not how you spell many. fail.
another victory for re cause you cant spell many.
7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Fe'rs fail
« on: May 31, 2008, 09:22:39 PM »What thread was locked?
Turkey sandwich and shaved llama are the threads that were locked.
and since your the person that locked them I have no idea why you would ask!
If your stupid enough to ask that then that's probably why your stupid enough to belive the earth is flat.
Boody hell!
8
Flat Earth Q&A / Fe'rs fail
« on: May 31, 2008, 08:42:12 PM »
Because as soon as you realise your defeated, and you cant accept the truth, you come up with illogic answers, just so you can reply.
And you lock the thread so your flaming can't continue further.
I can't belive there are actually adults on here making some of these posts
Wake up and smell the cheese! The world isn't flat! and your just on a stupid high.
Seriously, your all doomed, and I just can't see how you get by in life, but you seem to, so good on you.
I'm out of here retarts!
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!
***slams down the mic***
And you lock the thread so your flaming can't continue further.
I can't belive there are actually adults on here making some of these posts
Wake up and smell the cheese! The world isn't flat! and your just on a stupid high.
Seriously, your all doomed, and I just can't see how you get by in life, but you seem to, so good on you.
I'm out of here retarts!
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!
***slams down the mic***
9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Locking Threads....
« on: May 31, 2008, 08:37:21 PM »Raging-Hippo locked the thread.he was talking about his thread.Hello, I locked the ham sandwich thread because our logic was just too much for the fe'rs.
And this belongs in general discussion, as it doesn't relate to FE.
My thread was finished, and everyone is cool with that.
10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« on: May 31, 2008, 07:30:01 PM »
what's einsteins equation got to do with your planet being flat?
I though it had something to do with the energy released whe splitting an atom
I though it had something to do with the energy released whe splitting an atom
11
Flat Earth Debate / Re: A couple of shuttle questions.
« on: May 31, 2008, 07:27:46 PM »QuoteYou just made all of that up and you call it fact?
The shuttle is designed as a high altitude glider in your model too. Look it up.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22shuttle+is+a+glider%22&btnG=Google+Search
I clicked on images and saw pictures of space shuttles.
What's your point? I thought you were trying to say we diddn't go into space, not that we did.
although, if your saying we did go into space, well thankyou, you've done something right.
12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: ham sandwich
« on: May 31, 2008, 07:23:43 PM »Note that one of the reasons for believing in a flat earth is that it looks flat. If I were to look around then I would not believe in air, atmosphere and oxygen, but those things do happen to exist. What about atoms Roundy, do they exist? I can't see them in front of me, so using the basis that you use, they don't exist either. This argument is moot because none of you will ever accept proof of a round earth unless you see for yourself, at which point when you become converted the rest of the believers of a FE will say you were paid off.This is untrue as we can feel air as we can see the shape of the earth.
I can feel gravity and I can see the roundness of the earth.
See where there is no logic in producing a stalemate. Only cold hard evidence besides subjective belief can prove a flat earth or round earth.
And trust me, we have proof of a round earth. Just scroll upwards until you SEE a picture of it.
So you lose and we win.
Cheers,
=PS
PS: How many more boring subjective arguments will be generated from what I just said?
Exactly 5
and yer, we have picture proof, isn't that enough?
***your reply***
You: oooooooooh, prove it, whaaaaah.
Me: the picture
You: it's photo shopped
Me: no it isn't
You: it's in the FAQ
Me: The FAQ is BS
You: no it isn't
Me ...
It's like arguing to a kid.
Kid: your gay
me: no I'm not
Kid: no, your gay
Me: Shut up
Kid: no, your gay
Me: ...
You just cant win.
13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: any observations that support flat earth and not round earth?
« on: May 31, 2008, 06:33:48 PM »This is the sort of thing that irritates me about this site. Rather than trying to convince people by demonstrating how things really are, they come back with totally pathetic 'arguments' like 'look out your window, that proves it is flat!' I mean jesus, come on...
That kind of mindset is how people thought in the stone age. It looks a certain way, therefore it must be! I'm watching my television, it looks like there are people there behind the glass, so there must be! A plane in the sky at cruising height looks like it's only travelling at a few millimetres a second, therefore it must be!
What a load of complete rubbish. You must agree that those few statements are complete tosh, so why should "look out of the window, the Earth looks flat, so it must be flat!" be treated any differently?
Have you never heard of an 'optical illusion'? This is something that looks a certain way, but actually isn't. If the Earth's surface only has to change angle by 360 degrees over about 25 THOUSAND MILES, and just so you don't have to do the math, that means it's only changing angle on average by one degree every SEVENTY MILES, then it's going to LOOK flat isn't it? Even from the top of the CN Tower, they say on a clear day, clear day this is, you can see about a hundred miles. That's just over 1 degree of angle change. You wouldn't see it. The Earth would look flat. This I agree on.
But, and this is the distinction that none of you FE advocates seem to grasp, is that that doesn't prove anything. Just because something looks a certain way, doesn't make it so. Nothing you've said does, not convincingly. Prove me wrong, please do.
another victory for RE.
yeah, and if these people were moderatley smart people. That is all that would be needed to make them normal.
To all fe'rs, why do you choose to be retarted?
I got an avatar and a lil personal message, woo!
EarthIsFlatAndXenuEx...I like your quote from ski in your sig
14
Flat Earth Debate / Re: A couple of shuttle questions.
« on: May 31, 2008, 06:26:32 PM »Tom does not represent the flat earth society, he's just an internet troll, but without him there would be less people on the board
Ok fair enough, I should have seen that. My bad.
15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Edge of the Earth?
« on: May 31, 2008, 06:23:00 PM »Sorry, just read the FAQ's. I think it explains it very well, and it is much more believeable than the RE theory. It explains the ice wall, too. But I really want to get to the edge of the earth. Does anyone have any advice on climbing the ice wall and getting through the goverment forces?
Cheers
Yes, that explanation makes much more sense. That there is magical gigantic fucking ice block at the edges of the Earth that no one has ever seen than the actuality of the situation that the Earth is ROUND!
it's weird how after a post like that they still think the earth is flat???
16
Flat Earth Debate / Re: A couple of shuttle questions.
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:57:56 PM »Or he's not online.That's nice to know, seriously, I've noticed that Tom's the weirdest one of the lot.
Also, pretty much every FE poster will tell you that the views of Tom Bishop represent only his own (and we're not really sure about that even).
17
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Shaved llama
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:54:19 PM »Why call it shaved llama, and what does John mean?I've just got a thing going on with randomness...
John: really sick guy, moderator of the MTB forums I use, will kill you in your sleep.
If he was moderating here, evryone would be banned. What do the moderators on this website do anyway?
In before teh lock!
what?
18
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Those other guys...
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:51:48 PM »How deliciously absurd!not as bad a flat earth...
19
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: turkey sandwich
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:23:20 PM »Your issue is with RE cosmology, not with the FE.
can you just delete that post? it was complety pointless and wrong.
20
Flat Earth Debate / Re: A couple of shuttle questions.
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:20:53 PM »QuoteHow does NASA simulate the reentry of the shuttle from 38 miles up at 17,500 mph? People have watched the bright light of the shuttle as it reenters the atmosphere.
The shuttle is a high altitude glider which creates pretty lights in the sky as it free falls from the edge of space into the atmosphere of the earth.QuoteWhat happened to the shuttle Columbia? Again there are eyewitness accounts as it crossed the Californian coast all the way to Texas where it broke up.
The Shuttle Columbia was a prop failure.QuoteHow does NASA simulate the shuttle chasing the spacestation. I have personally seen this when the ISS goes overhead you can see it as a bright dot in the sky and the shuttle close behind it as a second bright dot.
NASA uses rockets to maneuver the shuttle.
You just made all of that up and you call it fact?
21
Flat Earth Q&A / Shaved llama
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:18:34 PM »
I'm just curious as to what I'm dealing with.
Preety simple really, answer to the post.
Preety simple really, answer to the post.
22
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is the Speed of Dark?
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:09:26 PM »The theory of Time Symmetry says it must, and that both are exactly the same as those of light.
Dark consists of nothing, light consists of energy.
If light energy has a speed,
How can nothing have a speed?
What proof do you have that dark consists of nothing. Don't say you can find it on google. Give actual proof, right here. And yes, I'm serious.
I'm not a phyicist.
and no , your not serious, fuck you.
I am serious. If you are absolutely sure that dark has no speed or acceleration, and consists of nothing, then surely you can provide the proof to back up your claim. The scientific, non circumstantial evidence. And don't ever tell me when I'm serious again. Come back with proof and some fucking manners.
Me/myself/I cannot provide proof, you cant either. I suppose we've reached a stalemate.
I'm sure a phyisist can provide proof though.
Quote
proof and some fucking manners.change your avatar too while I'm at it.
23
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is the Speed of Dark?
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:40:27 PM »The theory of Time Symmetry says it must, and that both are exactly the same as those of light.
Dark consists of nothing, light consists of energy.
If light energy has a speed,
How can nothing have a speed?
What proof do you have that dark consists of nothing. Don't say you can find it on google. Give actual proof, right here. And yes, I'm serious.
I'm not a phyicist.
and no , your not serious, fuck you.
24
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: ham sandwich
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:35:31 PM »
bump, for anybody that missed out of viewing this topic...
25
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is the Speed of Dark?
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:34:07 PM »The theory of Time Symmetry says it must, and that both are exactly the same as those of light.
Dark consists of nothing, light consists of energy.
If light energy has a speed,
How can nothing have a speed?
26
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is the Speed of Dark?
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:29:33 PM »woops, quoted wrongly;
"provide proof"
I already have...
ok, go into a drark room, turn the light on. The light tavels to the walls, floor etc... and it isn't dark because there is light.
now turn your light off, and the light stops being emmitted, Thus, it's dark again, because there isn't any light.
Prove that dark has no acceleration. You have yet to do that.
I dont need to prove it doesn't have accleration if I've proved it doesn't have speed.
Prove it doesn't have speed.
Your enjoying this aren't you
At least you dont have an opinion, and your just having some fun.
I'm serious. You have yet to prove it doesn't have speed or acceleration. Give me scientific evidence.
No, your not serious, now please, ploitley, fuck off!
Actually, I am completely serious, you haven't scientifically proven a thing. And now you're insulting me to avoid providing proof.
I can provide proof, I just need to research google for 10 mins to find a simple elplanation.
However, could you EVER! find proof that dark has an acceleration and.or speed? The answer is NO.
Why haven't I learn't about the speed of dark at school?
27
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: ham sandwich
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:27:40 PM »prove to me that hearts dont look like that
You are an idiot. You do not believe hearts look like that. But guess what? I can read your mind, so let me explain the argument that you are very poorly trying to make:
(1) Flat Earth theory is an assertion based on one fact, that the Earth looks flat.
(2) I can make a wild theory based on based on one observed fact, and it will be clear to everyone that my wild theory is false.
(3) Therefore, Flat Earth theory is false.
Step (1) is a false claim. Flat Earth theory is based on much gathered evidence about the direct shape of the earth.
Step (2) is also a poor link. Even the "one" observation you list is not comparable. The earth looks flat from every vantage point, every day.
Even if step (1) and (2) were true, you could not claim step (3)!!
So STFU.
no i have another reason why i believe all hearts look like that. because my 6 year old cousin has a "Lets Play Doctor" toy kit and it comes with an x-ray thing and she put it on my chest (where my heart is) and thats the image that showed up.
all hearts look like the picture i posted.
I just noticed your signature... makes me think a little
28
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: I knew it was impossible to win
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:25:58 PM »Your point?respond.
Old.
*****predicts answer*****
"read the FAQ, or go eat a pie."
LOL apparently every single question about FE has been asked and answered correctly.....which leads me to wonder why it isnt an accepted theory. Oh yeah, its not true!
RE + 100000000000000000000000000
FE - infinity
29
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: turkey sandwich
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:24:54 PM »
lol, I', surprised nobody's commented on it yet too.
anyways, Through my extensive research and observations, I have conculded that the earth is in fact NOT in the middle, it's 3km to the left!
I thought of it so it must be true.
anyways, Through my extensive research and observations, I have conculded that the earth is in fact NOT in the middle, it's 3km to the left!
I thought of it so it must be true.
30
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: What is the Speed of Dark?
« on: May 31, 2008, 04:22:48 PM »woops, quoted wrongly;
"provide proof"
I already have...
ok, go into a drark room, turn the light on. The light tavels to the walls, floor etc... and it isn't dark because there is light.
now turn your light off, and the light stops being emmitted, Thus, it's dark again, because there isn't any light.
Prove that dark has no acceleration. You have yet to do that.
I dont need to prove it doesn't have accleration if I've proved it doesn't have speed.
Prove it doesn't have speed.
Your enjoying this aren't you
At least you dont have an opinion, and your just having some fun.
I'm serious. You have yet to prove it doesn't have speed or acceleration. Give me scientific evidence.
No, your not serious, now please, ploitley, fuck off!