1

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: February 11, 2017, 04:25:32 PM »

The fact that you think you can post anything while under the effects of DMT proves how blithely ignorant you are.

Keep swallowing what the establishment tells you.

2

Flat Earth General / Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China

« on: February 04, 2017, 01:06:10 PM »

Eloquently put, but hypocritical at best.

You seem to be a little wide eyed yourself with your unsubstantiated belief in giants.

3

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: February 03, 2017, 06:47:54 PM »

Moving right along,   assuming the liquid is static,  that is no flow in taking place,  the pressure is everywhere the same and normal to all the surfaces,  irrespective of shape,  it could be a disk or a sphere or any shape at all for that matter the pressure is always normal to the surface,  regardless of the surface orientation.  There is no preferred overall direction to the pressure,  it is a scalar field, not a vector field.

But it would be normal to the surface of the disk, correct?
If you accept (even just briefly) Scepti's idea of molecules stacking, you can see why they would stack in a particular direction, then. There is something that sets one direction apart.

Scepti's model seems to imply the disc would be pushed to the bottom of the box. We all know this is not true. What about a force acting perpendicular to a surface equates to a downward push?

4

Flat Earth General / Re: Project Blue Beam

« on: February 03, 2017, 06:42:36 PM »

Resist

Question authority

Funny words from somebody who laps up every word of what his drug czar says

5

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: February 03, 2017, 06:35:43 PM »

This thread is not about finding the curve. This thread is about how staring at the sun is somehow good for you.

I can point to studies done by John's Hopkins University promoting the use of psychedelics in cancer patients to help with their anxiety and general outlook upon death.

Can you show us any reliable information regarding sungazing and any related health benifits?

Do you have cancer? Is that why youre a DMT addict?

I have done DMT twice in my life, 3 years apart. I hardly consider that an addiction.

If you knew anything at all beyond what your Masters tell you, you would know that psychedelics aren't habit forming.

Nice dodge though. You still can't find any reliable information regarding the health benifits of sungazing, can you?

Psychedelics are objectively better for your health than staring at the sun. End of story.

6

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: February 01, 2017, 08:43:31 PM »

This thread is not about finding the curve. This thread is about how staring at the sun is somehow good for you.

I can point to studies done by John's Hopkins University promoting the use of psychedelics in cancer patients to help with their anxiety and general outlook upon death.

Can you show us any reliable information regarding sungazing and any related health benifits?

7

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 30, 2017, 10:47:22 AM »

It seems to me that most posters believe UA to be more accurate than denpressure.

I agree. Denpressure relies upon some fantastic assumptions in order to function. At least UA can accurately model gravity.

8

Flat Earth General / Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity

« on: January 30, 2017, 10:45:38 AM »

How does barometric pressure correlate with downward force?

If I weigh 100kg at sea level (100kPa), how much would I weigh at 97kPa?

Would I weigh 3% less?

9

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 29, 2017, 12:21:37 PM »

I tried engaging you in a calm, rational manner, but you flipped out and called me an alt.

10

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 28, 2017, 08:01:55 PM »

I know the earth is accelerating.

You claim that you "know the earth is accelerating".

To claim that you know something seems to imply that you have irrefutable evidence for it - where is this irrefutable evidence?

The earth is accelerating in the round earth theory as well.

In what way do you claim that the Globe (not round earth, your flat earth is also round) is accelerating.
I agree that the surface is subject to very slight centripetal acceleration as it rotates and
the earth as a whole is subject to a much smaller centripetal acceleration due to its orbiting the sun.

But this has no connection with gravitation, so what acceleration are you referring to.

The earth's orbit follows a continuous elliptical shape. As the earth hurdles through space, the direction of travel constantly changes due to the sun's gravity. Since the earth is changing directions constantly, it is also changing velocity. 

Since acceleration is defined as a change in velocity, one would be correct in saying that the earth is constantly accelerating as it moves about its orbit.

11

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 28, 2017, 11:05:58 AM »

Now you know I can't emulate the real experiment. It's way lout of mine and your power.

If you have no experimental evidence to support your claims, then how did you reach these conclusions?

12

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 28, 2017, 11:03:24 AM »

Psychedelics, used in moderation, can be beneficial.

For some people.  For others they can be a terrible idea.

Of course. I was trying to illustrate a point about sungazing, most people seem to have missed that.

13

Flat Earth General / Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China

« on: January 28, 2017, 10:48:36 AM »

The church and the government are entirely separate entities. Why wouldn't the church fund serious research into the existence of the Nephilim?

14

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 28, 2017, 10:47:18 AM »

I know the earth is accelerating.

You claim that you "know the earth is accelerating".

To claim that you know something seems to imply that you have irrefutable evidence for it - where is this irrefutable evidence?

The earth is accelerating in the round earth theory as well.

15

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 27, 2017, 05:19:26 PM »

I know the earth is accelerating. That's why I wrote that it was moving at 9.8m/s²

It makes no difference. Since the entire system is enclosed in the dome, the difference between an upwardly accelerating plane and what we experience as gravity would be indestinguishable.

16

Flat Earth General / Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China

« on: January 27, 2017, 05:02:27 PM »

How many untold millions could the Church stand to gain if they could find verifiable proof of the Nephilim?

If you are going to make the claim that dinosaurs are simply giant human bones retooled to look like giant lizards, then why hasn't anybody been able to prove it?

17

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 27, 2017, 04:55:19 PM »

I read a similar thread not too long ago where a user called JROA had an interesting answer for the non-uniform pattern of gravitational energy.

If I recall correctly, he used an analogy using a ship's sail with rips in it. Let the sail itself represent earth, and the wind propelling the ship along represents the "dark energy" that propels the universe through space.

The varying elements within the earth's crust could allow the dark energy to pass through at different speeds, resulting in a varying "gravitational" reading.

18

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 27, 2017, 04:50:25 PM »

Think back, who was it that told you psychedelics were harmful? Your teacher? Your government?

Keep shilling your paranoid delusions. Psychedelics, used in moderation, can be beneficial.

Just like sungazing, right? 

19

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 27, 2017, 04:46:39 PM »

If the earth is a enclosed in a dome, then the entire system would be moving upwards at 9.8m/s² , not just the ground itself. Flight mechanics would not change in the slightest.

20

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 26, 2017, 09:42:29 PM »

Denpressure fails to stand up to an evacuation chamber.

Thats false, you misunderstand what an evacuation chamber is.

An evacuation chamber removes almost all barometric pressure from an enclosed space. The pressure inside one of these chambers once it has been evacuated is so low that mercury barometers cannot give any reading.

Think about this. If the atmosphere inside an evacuated chamber cannot exert enough energy upon a mercury barometer to get a reading, how could the air pressure possibly have enough force to push a bowling ball downwards?

21

Flat Earth General / Re: UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 26, 2017, 06:54:45 PM »

I would vote denspressure as well over UA.

Why?

Because it is so easy to prove incorrect. Air travel ends UA.

Denpressure fails to stand up to an evacuation chamber.

How is air travel impossible under UA?

22

Flat Earth General / UA vs Denpressure

« on: January 26, 2017, 06:01:35 PM »

Which model describes reality with fewer assumptions?

I think the answer is UA, because denpressure needs some serious mental gymnastics to figure out how the sun is supposed to work the way we see it currently.

Upward Acceleration also seems to fit the description of gravity a lot better. Denpressure caves when evacuation chambers are introduced, and denpressure also seems to have strange definitions for displacement and other commonly known scientific principles.

23

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 26, 2017, 05:30:52 PM »

I keep telling you what it does. The pineal is the origin of all human thought, and sungazing strengthens it immensely. Why? The pineal is light sensitive, thats why its also called the third eye! So by exercising the seat of your soul, your soul is strengthened.

You do realize that the pineal gland of humans is not photoreceptive, right? You're thinking of reptiles.

The human pineal gland has no direct connection to the eyes. Your views are foolish and misguided.

24

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 26, 2017, 05:26:53 PM »

If you want to pretend as though ayahuasca use has no value, continue to live in your fantasy land.

You ignore all the cancer patients who have come to terms with death because of ayahuasca.

You ignore all the heroin addicts who are able to see their destructive habits from a new angle and choose a new life path, thanks to ayahuasca.

You are young, so I realize you have very little experience in life thus far.

Those who have told you that psychedelics are harmful to your mind are the same ones who abused such substances in the name of mind control. Open your eyes. You have been lied to.

25

Flat Earth General / Re: Project Blue Beam

« on: January 26, 2017, 10:52:48 AM »

What use would the CIA have for researching mind control?

Interrogation. If they could force an enemy spy to divulge classified information, that could be considered beneficial. Especially during the Cold War.

Wow. Why not just start chopping off fingers and toes? Which one is more cruel? Warping a mind irreparably or a few physical setbacks?

Warping the mind could be considered worse. Some of the experiments in MK ULTRA describe victims locked in solitary confinement, in pitch dark, secretly dosed with copious amounts of LSD. Souns insanity inducing to me, but I don't know what kind of answers one could expect to obtain from somebody in such a state.

26

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 26, 2017, 10:44:38 AM »

but the pineal gland is the only gland capable of producing dimethyltriptamine

Well, maybe.

No, not maybe. Do a little research.

I have - there is one study from 2013 that found evidence for the production of DMT in the pineal gland of mice.  No studies show a direct correlation in humans.  So, maybe is correct.

Not maybe, but very probably. The only reason why we haven't found trace amounts of DMT in the human pineal gland is because no such study exists. While it has not yet been proven, I staunchly believe the pineal gland is the source of DMT in humans as well as mice.

27

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 26, 2017, 10:41:58 AM »

DMT is nothing like steroids, but I'll chalk that up to child-like ignorance. You still have yet to explain why sungazing is good for the pineal gland.

28

Flat Earth General / Re: Project Blue Beam

« on: January 25, 2017, 07:58:04 PM »

Pump them full of MDMA, they'll start talkin..

"I LOOOVE YOU MAN, CAN YOU SCRATCH MY HEAD AND GET ME SOME WATER??"

29

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 25, 2017, 07:46:44 PM »

You are a fool. DMT is meant to be produced in the body, not taken externally. Sun gazing provides the pineal with the energy required to create a nourish the body with its own naturally made chemicals.

It was certainly a harrowing experience. Not for the faint of heart. I wouldn't recommend you use such substances until your mind is fully developed; at 15 you mind isn't mature enough to handle such an experience.

Unless you are dying, or near death, the pineal gland only produces trace amounts of DMT, and its primary function is melatonin production. The pineal gland produces the same amount of melatonin regardless of the amount of sungazing you do.

Which specific chemicals do you think are aided by sungazing?

30

Flat Earth General / Re: Looking at the sun is good for you.

« on: January 25, 2017, 11:26:57 AM »

The 3rd eye present in some reptile species is directly tied to the pineal gland. This 3rd eye is sometimes called the parapineal gland. Reptiles use this gland to regulate body temperature and produce hormones like melatonin.

Indeed, DMT exists in some concentration in almost every single living thing on Earth. South Americans have been extracting the substance from various tree barks for spiritual purposes for millenia.

I have personally taken DMT on several separate occasions, and I can attest to the spiritual qualities of the stuff.