AS USUAL YOU DIDN'T READ THE THREAD. I already admitted the post was wrong. You are just to lazy to read the thread to find that.
AS USUAL, YOU FAILED TO COMPREHEND MY POST.
No
There are more questions with Yes/No answers in kindergartens, you know. Why don't you attend one of them instead?
Those have nothing to do with gravity, they deal with gravitation.
Who said a gravitational field must be gravity?
If you look at it that way I could back up anything, even if its wrong.
Again,
AS USUAL, YOU FAILED TO COMPREHEND MY POST.
My post said you claimed you could back up any claims, no matter if it is old or recent. Hence, you have to back up that old claim. However, you put all these random backups (photons don't accelerate or they have no rest mass) and concluded with, "when did I say photons don't generate a gravitational field recently?" Which is why I said, "You call that a support?"
Thus, your statement "I could back up any claims" is false.
Once again, I could back it up. The back up would be wrong too, but I could. Not only that, but I keep saying recently because you keep acting like I still don't think photons have a gravitation.
My post said you claimed you could back up any claims, no matter if it is old or recent. Hence, you have to back up that old claim. However, you put all these random backups (photons don't accelerate or photons have no rest mass) and concluded with, "when did I say photons don't generate a gravitational field recently?" Which is why I said, "You call that a support?"
Thus, your statement "I could back up any claims" is false.
They don't invite nobodies to games.
So?
Is that even a real response?
Of course it is.
You are an idiot.
You are just full of fail. I guess I finally have my reason to not take you seriously.
It's not my fault you can't read.
It's not my fault your grammar is filled with fail.