Poll

Should engy unlock this thread?

Yes
No

RE floating oceans.

  • 817 Replies
  • 161711 Views
?

Fallap

  • 15
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #660 on: November 06, 2007, 12:40:18 PM »
Omg, why is pancakes not round?  :o

?

RE.IS.TRUE

Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #661 on: November 06, 2007, 12:42:24 PM »
People belives all kinds of stuff these days :D

must be pretty boring to live in a lie

?

Fallap

  • 15
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #662 on: November 06, 2007, 12:43:43 PM »
Lol yeah, I mean, 1000 years ago when people was stupid and had miserable lifes.

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #663 on: November 06, 2007, 12:45:17 PM »

*

questions

  • 206
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #664 on: November 06, 2007, 12:47:34 PM »
I like waffles better than pancakes.

YAY FOR SQUARE WURLD!   :-*

?

RE.IS.TRUE

Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #665 on: November 06, 2007, 12:50:33 PM »
One question to the "FE sociaty"...

You keep saying that you have "proof" that your belifes are correct. I have seen none.
Christians say they have proof (bible)
Muslims say they have proof
Scientists say they have proof (real pictures)
You say you have proof (where?)

This is just another stupid sect, without proof, without brains

?

Fallap

  • 15
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #666 on: November 06, 2007, 12:51:40 PM »

*

questions

  • 206
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #667 on: November 06, 2007, 12:57:22 PM »
One question to the "FE sociaty"...

You keep saying that you have "proof" that your belifes are correct. I have seen none.
Christians say they have proof (bible)
Muslims say they have proof
Scientists say they have proof (real pictures)
You say you have proof (where?)

This is just another stupid sect, without proof, without brains

Aw, come on, they have their sacred texts, "Earth not a globe"!!!   See, just like every other religion.  8) 

j/k guys, I know most of you are atheists.  :P

?

RE.IS.TRUE

Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #668 on: November 06, 2007, 12:59:39 PM »
No you are right. This is a religion

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #669 on: November 06, 2007, 01:01:10 PM »
The Church of Physics.

~D-Draw

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9074
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #670 on: November 06, 2007, 01:09:59 PM »
Correction: Church of Flawed Physics.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

questions

  • 206
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #671 on: November 06, 2007, 01:11:19 PM »
Correction: Church of Flawed Physics.

That made me giggle.  :)

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #672 on: November 06, 2007, 01:31:03 PM »
A) I wasn't singling out the flat Earth theory, more satirizing to show how stupid his statement was.

B) Show me where physics are flawed in the flat Earth theory. I dare you.

~D-Draw

*

questions

  • 206
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #673 on: November 06, 2007, 01:35:01 PM »
A) I wasn't singling out the flat Earth theory, more satirizing to show how stupid his statement was.
~D-Draw

D-Draw: Are you referring to me?  I can't tell.   ???

?

eric bloedow

Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #674 on: November 07, 2007, 08:45:12 AM »
the FE model contradicts numerous actual observations about weather patterns.
it also fails to explain tides.

someone said, "water floats in water, therefore water has no weight".

weight and MASS are not the same thing.

also, air floats in air.
and air has mass: just feel wind!

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #675 on: November 07, 2007, 09:28:28 AM »
A) I wasn't singling out the flat Earth theory, more satirizing to show how stupid his statement was.

B) Show me where physics are flawed in the flat Earth theory. I dare you.

~D-Draw

*cough*orbits*cough*

*cough*the sun*cough*

*cough*all of it*cough*
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

semperround

  • 2903
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #676 on: November 07, 2007, 10:37:03 AM »
Okay all you smart RE'ers, how much does a pint of water weigh when in water.
i'm sure someone already answered this put it wieghs the same as a pint of water.
an vir

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #677 on: November 07, 2007, 01:34:22 PM »
Quote from: pancakebitch
B) Show me where physics are flawed in the flat Earth theory. I dare you.

Any math any time anywhere. The problem is no math has been cited to support FE. I can't point to a flaw in your physics if you don't show me where any physics is used.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #678 on: November 07, 2007, 01:36:21 PM »
A) I wasn't singling out the flat Earth theory, more satirizing to show how stupid his statement was.
~D-Draw

D-Draw: Are you referring to me?  I can't tell.   ???

whoa! a chick? no no no. probably a dude posing.  :'(
........
Good enough.  :-*
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #679 on: November 07, 2007, 11:17:44 PM »
Any math any time anywhere. The problem is no math has been cited to support FE. I can't point to a flaw in your physics if you don't show me where any physics is used.

Some simple ones:

a=2d/t^2 

where d is distance, t is time and a is acceleration.  Very useful when you want to find out the rate of acceleration of the FE.

x = V*cos(theta)*t
y = V*sin(theta)*t -.5at^2
 
where V is velocity, theta is the inclination angle, a is the same as before and t is time.  Neglecting air resistance, this nicely provides the trajectory of an object.

Oh, and let's not forget my personal favorite:

w = (u+v)/(1+u*v/c^2)

where u is the current velocity of the FE, v is 9.8m/s, c is the speed of light and w is the resulting velocity from the addition, to be used as u in the successive iterations.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

questions

  • 206
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #680 on: November 08, 2007, 12:13:27 AM »
A) I wasn't singling out the flat Earth theory, more satirizing to show how stupid his statement was.
~D-Draw

D-Draw: Are you referring to me?  I can't tell.   ???

whoa! a chick? no no no. probably a dude posing.  :'(
........
Good enough.  :-*

Actually, my name is Tiffany.  :-/

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #681 on: November 08, 2007, 05:21:54 AM »
35 pages??? When will the madness end? When, when?
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14993
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #682 on: November 08, 2007, 05:37:16 AM »
When you stop posting.

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #683 on: November 08, 2007, 05:40:10 AM »
when you stop posting.
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #684 on: November 08, 2007, 07:11:13 AM »
I will never stop posting
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

Jenova Cell

  • 236
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #685 on: November 08, 2007, 07:13:41 AM »
Then by logic, this thread will *NEVER* end.
Minds are like parachutes. They only function when they are open.

*cough* Tom *cough*

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #686 on: November 08, 2007, 07:15:02 AM »
clearly.

Unless TheEngineer locks it.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

greatmaju

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #687 on: November 08, 2007, 02:40:40 PM »
hold on, sorry if this is already mention but i havent had time read all the pages, but water floats? wait lets try that, hang on, ive got a wet foot now. hmmm...maybe you FEs should go back to school.
 and why doesnt anything float away anyway??? i call it gravity to be simplific.
OWNED LIKE A POTATO!!

i, for one, believe that the earth is round.

although, come up with good evidance against flat earth and you will be abused. hmmm....

Any evidance of a flat earth?? no,none hmmm...

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #688 on: November 08, 2007, 02:50:23 PM »
i call it gravity to be simplific.
Simplistic, indeed.  Gravity is a lie.

Quote
why doesnt anything float away anyway???
The earth is experiencing a continuous 9.8m/s^2 acceleration upwards.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #689 on: November 08, 2007, 02:56:43 PM »
Noobs are dumb.