61

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Experiment

« on: September 17, 2007, 09:34:31 AM »

No, dumb because you and I both know thats not how the RE compass works. I'm sure your going to argue otherwise, but the point remains, that you dont know what your talking about

62

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Experiment

« on: September 17, 2007, 09:32:08 AM »

Thats is probably the stupidest experiment I've ever heard (though not quite because you've had dumber ones, like the falling rock)

63

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Polaris

« on: September 17, 2007, 09:30:22 AM »

Actually yes. I would get mad at you (like others are about to), but I was in your position not too long ago. stick around and you will see that the FEers have alot of answers. they may not be right, but do try to go through and check out for the answers you just asked. many can be found on the first page if you actually look

64

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Evidence of a conspiracy

« on: September 16, 2007, 11:36:57 AM »

"we dont have a mountain of hard evidence, but we do have some...."

Where is this evidence? and I dont mean things disproving an RE, I mean things that prve a FE

65

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Ice wall

« on: September 16, 2007, 10:41:18 AM »

hmm.. theres a difference in digging through an ice wall (or even the flat earth) as compared to digging though the huge RE. I havent been rude to you, and I dunno why you think I'm a tard. maybe I'm reading it wrong or simply not understanding, but thats my opinion

66

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Ice wall

« on: September 15, 2007, 07:05:19 PM »

you calling me a tard or theengineer? and before you answer that, thing about what he asked. k thanks

67

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Ice wall

« on: September 15, 2007, 08:55:33 AM »

"provided the earth is round, why has nobody dug through it?" - TheEngineer

Do you know how thick the round earth is? we simply dont have the technology to go that far into it.. I mean, as smart as you seem to be, you should atleast know the basics.

68

Flat Earth Debate / Re: If the Earth is flat...

« on: September 12, 2007, 09:36:42 PM »

I dunno about you, but when I look out at the ocean, I cant see the end. by this logic, it is obviously an INFINITE ocean! duh..

69

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Woudln't this totally debunk everything?

« on: September 11, 2007, 08:16:49 AM »

Um..Tom... where is Australia in your map that you provided? I've been there, so I'm pretty sure it exist 

70

Flat Earth Debate / Northern Lights

« on: September 07, 2007, 02:32:08 PM »

From my understanding, the lights appear pretty dang high in our skies. Yet, only the far nothern areas can see them. I dont think this would be the case in a said flat earth. any takers?

71

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Gravity changes.

« on: August 30, 2007, 03:26:17 PM »

Narc, did you know that someones weight can change anywhere from 10 lbs a day?! so maybe you measured your weight and it had changed from when you measured earlier to the time of the actual eclipse or whatever! man..its crazy I know, but your theory doesnt prove jack.

72

Flat Earth Debate / Re: youtube video.. pretty convincing :]

« on: August 24, 2007, 08:21:58 AM »

I will give $100 to anyone who can recreate this video and make it look even close to convincing. good luck.. 

73

Flat Earth Debate / youtube video.. pretty convincing :]

« on: August 22, 2007, 02:35:55 PM »

I dunno, maybe special effects, ut it looks pretty real

74

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Northen lights

« on: August 06, 2007, 08:46:13 PM »

I was refering to where TE said that it was semetric in his model. if thats true, then how do magnets work beyond the ice wall?

75

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Where did all the clouds go?

« on: August 06, 2007, 08:20:16 PM »

Which are nothing compared to the mistakes of FEers. There are enough idiots who are on FEs side, and we dont need any other people just pretending for the sake of argument. you can correct REers for mistakes, but taking a side you dont believe is just annoying and ignorant

76

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Where did all the clouds go?

« on: August 06, 2007, 08:15:26 PM »

Divito. you claim to be an REer, so could you not just stay with that, rather than arguing with the people on your side? Its kinda annoying, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks so

77

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Northen lights

« on: August 06, 2007, 08:14:03 PM »

Could you show me one of your* models? I dont have a grasp of it yet

78

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Where did all the clouds go?

« on: August 06, 2007, 08:10:35 PM »

He was saying that since the Ice wall wouldnt protect all of the clouds, then the clouds would eventually go out beyond the wall.

79

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Northen lights

« on: August 06, 2007, 08:09:17 PM »

so if you go beyond the "ice wall", then magnets no longer work? show me the symetric one so I know I've got it figured out

80

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Universal Elevator?

« on: August 06, 2007, 07:40:26 PM »

He just likes to play the devils advocate to annoy people or simply to hear an argument.

81

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Where did all the clouds go?

« on: August 06, 2007, 07:37:50 PM »

wow.. FE has only been around for 150 years? or are you saying the Ice wall has only been there for 150 years? now I'm really confused, Tom

82

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Northen lights

« on: August 06, 2007, 03:10:28 PM »

your asking TomB to actually give proof? you might be waiting.. I dunno.. forever 

83

Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Northen lights

« on: August 06, 2007, 11:35:18 AM »

I believe we can see much further than 12 miles. and how do you explain the fact that if your further up, you can see further? on ground level, you can see only certain distance-- that is correct. however, If I were to go to the top of the empire state building, I will be able to see MUCH further. if the "atmolayer" is a constant, then how do you explain this? and to take it further, if your in an airplane, you can see a whole lot further than you would at the top of the empire state building. There is no way your theory can stand true if everything is at a constant like you say.

84

Flat Earth Debate / The Northen lights

« on: August 06, 2007, 09:52:19 AM »

Assuming the Earth is flat, how is it that people around the world cant witness the northern lights? The lights occur incredibly high in our atmosphere, and if the Earth is indeed flat, everone on the planet should be able to see atleast SOME of the lights. any ideas?

85

Flat Earth Debate / Google Earth

« on: July 08, 2007, 03:58:46 PM »

Ok, so on FE satelites dont exist for some reason. so how do you explain how google earth took the pictures in the first place? and you can say they are a hoax, because you can see your house from those pictures, assuming you look hard enough. just a random thought I had

86

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Anything besides Gravity wrong with RE?

« on: July 07, 2007, 09:39:29 PM »

I was going to say something along those lines. The FEers keep bringing up problems with dark matter and stuff which have NOTHING to do with the Earth being round. Just an evasion tactic I suppose

87

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity

« on: June 30, 2007, 07:12:03 PM »

As much as I may dissagree with him, I'm liking TheEngineer more and more withe very post 

88

Flat Earth Debate / Re: the flat earth sun

« on: June 27, 2007, 03:38:41 PM »

So I think we ran DanielPZC off  took long enough..

89

Flat Earth Debate / Re: the flat earth sun

« on: June 27, 2007, 03:33:29 PM »

sorry, I just thought you were being a smartass. not that I have much room to talk about smartasses . oops 

90

Flat Earth Debate / Re: the flat earth sun

« on: June 27, 2007, 03:30:25 PM »

And men have gone to space. explain how a man can survive in the STOMACH of a whale for days and somehow live. your so full of it and you know it. theres a name for people like you. troll. now leave