stop with the cute flaming thing. Destroying credibility is fallacious. Just because someone is shown not to be a reliable source, doesn't mean what the are saying is wrong. This is formally known as ad hominem. credibility=/=argument.
It's only an ad hominem if the person is being attacked and not the argument. Naturally credibility and argument are not the same thing, but surely you must recognize that the two are dependent on each other (if you don't I can't help you). If you tear a person's argument to pieces, you are doing the same thing to his credibility, if he claims to know what he's talking about (as nearly everybody who tries to debate against him, and fails, does).
James is a master at destroying credibility by destroying arguments.
I have not seen one instance this in my one year being here
Lurk moar.
Again you show us that post count does not say anything about post quality. Although I do not think James is capable of destroying anyones credibility, I think you however are very capable at destroying your own credebility as shown in this post of yours. If this is what we should consider a "normal" reaction from you in a serious debate forum then what does that say about your other posts......