Heiwas lack of understanding in everything and his obsession with poop

Quote from: Boots on June 27, 2017, 09:17:28 AM

Prove it and I'll pay you 1M €. So far you have been unable to do so.

?? I prove everything at my web site - http://heiwaco.com - and you don't pay as expected but I get a good laugh anyway. You suffer from cognitive dissonance and live in a fantasy world.

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:26:00 AM

Quote from: Boots on June 27, 2017, 09:17:28 AM

Prove it and I'll pay you 1M €. So far you have been unable to do so.

?? I prove everything at my web site - http://heiwaco.com - and you don't pay as expected but I get a good laugh anyway. You suffer from cognitive dissonance and live in a fantasy world.

Have your claims peer reviewed by an independent party and I'll pay you 10 dollars.

Quote from: Dog

Have your claims peer reviewed by an independent party and I'll pay you 10 dollars.

Of course! My site http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm is downloaded by >200 times/day and there are no complaints at all. Just positive mails from all over the world.

Do you believe that humans have travelled in space ... to the Moon, to the ISS? Why do you do it?

Quote from: Dog on June 27, 2017, 11:06:02 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:26:00 AM

Quote from: Boots on June 27, 2017, 09:17:28 AM

Prove it and I'll pay you 1M €. So far you have been unable to do so.

?? I prove everything at my web site - http://heiwaco.com - and you don't pay as expected but I get a good laugh anyway. You suffer from cognitive dissonance and live in a fantasy world.

Have your claims peer reviewed by an independent party and I'll pay you 10 dollars.

Of course! My site http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm is downloaded by >200 times/day and there are no complaints at all. Just positive mails from all over the world.
Human space travel is of course a joke since early 1960's. Just fun. It never happened. It didn't hurt anyone. I just laugh about it as a typical example of Fake News like my supporters. Only idiots believe in manned space travel. I just feel sorry for them.

Do you believe that humans have travelled in space ... to the Moon, to the ISS? Why do you do it? Does it make you happy?

Quote from: Dog on June 27, 2017, 11:06:02 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:26:00 AM

Quote from: Boots on June 27, 2017, 09:17:28 AM

Prove it and I'll pay you 1M €. So far you have been unable to do so.

?? I prove everything at my web site - http://heiwaco.com - and you don't pay as expected but I get a good laugh anyway. You suffer from cognitive dissonance and live in a fantasy world.

Have your claims peer reviewed by an independent party and I'll pay you 10 dollars.

Of course! My site http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm is downloaded by >200 times/day and there are no complaints at all. Just positive mails from all over the world.
Human space travel is of course a joke since early 1960's. Just fun. It never happened. It didn't hurt anyone. I just laugh about it as a typical example of Fake News like my supporters. Only idiots believe in manned space travel. I just feel sorry for them.

Do you believe that humans have travelled in space ... to the Moon, to the ISS? Why do you do it? Does it make you happy?

Do you believe that humans have travelled in space ... to the Moon, to the ISS? Why do you do it? Does it make you happy?

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 11:26:58 AM

Do you believe that humans have travelled in space ... to the Moon, to the ISS? Why do you do it? Does it make you happy?

Do you believe that Arianespace can put satellites into geostationary orbit even though they can't carry enough fuel or figure out when and in what direction to fire the rocket engine to transfer from low earth orbit to geostationary orbit?

If you can prove it I will pay you 1M€.

Quote from: Boots on June 27, 2017, 02:32:52 PM

If you can prove it I will pay you 1M€.

But I did, and you didn't pay.

Arianespace using their rockets only sends things one way up in the sky on behalf of outside clients. It is a good business.

Quote from: Boots on June 27, 2017, 02:32:52 PM

If you can prove it I will pay you 1M€.

But I did, and you didn't pay.

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 01:26:58 PM

Arianespace using their rockets only sends things one way up in the sky on behalf of outside clients. It is a good business.

But It's very bad for business if Arianespace can't get the satellite into the proper orbit because they can't carry enough propellant to transfer from low earth orbit to geostationary orbit.  Wouldn't you agree?

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 27, 2017, 11:26:14 PM

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

To be fair, and in my (very) limited understanding of orbits, if you "stopped" you would simply fall into the body you are orbiting. That's why we need such a large velocity to achieve orbit and a much higher escape velocity.

Stopping on another planet would just be like taking off from earth again.










Edit.

Inb4 re-entry is impossible.

Quote from: disputeone on June 27, 2017, 11:31:56 PM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 27, 2017, 11:26:14 PM

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

To be fair, and in my (very) limited understanding of orbits, if you "stopped" you would simply fall into the body you are orbiting. That's why we need such a large velocity to achieve orbit and a much higher escape velocity.

Stopping on another planet would just be like taking off from earth again.










Edit.

Inb4 re-entry is impossible.

Yeah, but what does that have to do with stopping and starting again? The only time you have to stop is when you land on the moon. After that it's a lot easier to take off from the moon because of its substantially weaker gravity and lack of atmosphere.

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 28, 2017, 12:48:31 AM

Quote from: disputeone on June 27, 2017, 11:31:56 PM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 27, 2017, 11:26:14 PM

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

To be fair, and in my (very) limited understanding of orbits, if you "stopped" you would simply fall into the body you are orbiting. That's why we need such a large velocity to achieve orbit and a much higher escape velocity.

Stopping on another planet would just be like taking off from earth again.










Edit.

Inb4 re-entry is impossible.

Yeah, but what does that have to do with stopping and starting again? The only time you have to stop is when you land on the moon. After that it's a lot easier to take off from the moon because of its substantially weaker gravity and lack of atmosphere.

Space travel is complicated. First you have to get into high speed orbit around Earth and from there into another higher speed orbit or variable speed/direction trajectory to reach the Moon or Mars that you probably orbit before slowing down to land on. Earth gravity really slows you down getting away. The return trip is similar. You take off into orbit Moon or Mars and from there you speed off into another orbit or trajectory to return to Earth. As soon as you are subject to Earth gravity, you go faster and faster towards the center of Earth and then you have to re-enter and land. It seems nobody knows how to calculate the fuel required for all these maneuvers for any trip and that one or the big problem is to take off with all the fuel aboard at the beginning. Actually it is not possible at all.

Quote from: Heiwa on June 28, 2017, 03:29:01 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 28, 2017, 12:48:31 AM

Quote from: disputeone on June 27, 2017, 11:31:56 PM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 27, 2017, 11:26:14 PM

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

To be fair, and in my (very) limited understanding of orbits, if you "stopped" you would simply fall into the body you are orbiting. That's why we need such a large velocity to achieve orbit and a much higher escape velocity.

Stopping on another planet would just be like taking off from earth again.










Edit.

Inb4 re-entry is impossible.

Yeah, but what does that have to do with stopping and starting again? The only time you have to stop is when you land on the moon. After that it's a lot easier to take off from the moon because of its substantially weaker gravity and lack of atmosphere.

Space travel is complicated. First you have to get into high speed orbit around Earth and from there into another higher speed orbit or variable speed/direction trajectory to reach the Moon or Mars that you probably orbit before slowing down to land on. Earth gravity really slows you down getting away. The return trip is similar. You take off into orbit Moon or Mars and from there you speed off into another orbit or trajectory to return to Earth. As soon as you are subject to Earth gravity, you go faster and faster towards the center of Earth and then you have to re-enter and land. It seems nobody knows how to calculate the fuel required for all these maneuvers for any trip and that one or the big problem is to take off with all the fuel aboard at the beginning. Actually it is not possible at all.

It seems that you completely ignore all hints that are given to you. If you know the required delta-v then you can simply use this equation. Do you debate that or do you simply not know how to calculate the necessary delta-v?

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 28, 2017, 12:48:31 AM

Quote from: disputeone on June 27, 2017, 11:31:56 PM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 27, 2017, 11:26:14 PM

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

To be fair, and in my (very) limited understanding of orbits, if you "stopped" you would simply fall into the body you are orbiting. That's why we need such a large velocity to achieve orbit and a much higher escape velocity.

Stopping on another planet would just be like taking off from earth again.










Edit.

Inb4 re-entry is impossible.

Yeah, but what does that have to do with stopping and starting again? The only time you have to stop is when you land on the moon. After that it's a lot easier to take off from the moon because of its substantially weaker gravity and lack of atmosphere.

Space travel is complicated. First you have to get into high speed orbit around Earth and from there into another higher speed orbit or variable speed/direction trajectory to reach the Moon or Mars that you probably orbit before slowing down to land on. Earth gravity really slows you down getting away. The return trip is similar. You take off into orbit Moon or Mars and from there you speed off into another orbit or trajectory to return to Earth. As soon as you are subject to Earth gravity, you go faster and faster towards the center of Earth and then you have to re-enter and land. It seems nobody knows how to calculate the fuel required for all these maneuvers for any trip and that one or the big problem is to take off with all the fuel aboard at the beginning. Actually it is not possible at all.

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

?? What has delta-v to do with fuel consumption for space trips?

Quote from: Heiwa on June 28, 2017, 03:29:01 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 28, 2017, 12:48:31 AM

Quote from: disputeone on June 27, 2017, 11:31:56 PM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on June 27, 2017, 11:26:14 PM

Why do you think you have to "stop and start again"?

To be fair, and in my (very) limited understanding of orbits, if you "stopped" you would simply fall into the body you are orbiting. That's why we need such a large velocity to achieve orbit and a much higher escape velocity.

Stopping on another planet would just be like taking off from earth again.










Edit.

Inb4 re-entry is impossible.

Yeah, but what does that have to do with stopping and starting again? The only time you have to stop is when you land on the moon. After that it's a lot easier to take off from the moon because of its substantially weaker gravity and lack of atmosphere.

Space travel is complicated. First you have to get into high speed orbit around Earth and from there into another higher speed orbit or variable speed/direction trajectory to reach the Moon or Mars that you probably orbit before slowing down to land on. Earth gravity really slows you down getting away. The return trip is similar. You take off into orbit Moon or Mars and from there you speed off into another orbit or trajectory to return to Earth. As soon as you are subject to Earth gravity, you go faster and faster towards the center of Earth and then you have to re-enter and land. It seems nobody knows how to calculate the fuel required for all these maneuvers for any trip and that one or the big problem is to take off with all the fuel aboard at the beginning. Actually it is not possible at all.

You make some interesting claims in this post.  Similar to claims you make on your website.  However, it’s well established that we can and do send vehicle into space.  Even so far as to impact a comet on the Deep Impact project. 

There is more than a century of peer reviewed papers, journals, college text books, and actual launches/missions.  Since you make the extraordinary claim that none of this is possible I have to ask.  What is your technical basis?  What calculations or experiments support you opinion?

Here, I’ll help you out.  Your website states, in part, that the Juno mission would be impossible due to quasars and black holes.  Your site provides plenty of disparate facts and conclusions but provide no direct or sources for an analytical basis to show why the Juno mission would be impossible.  Here are a couple of papers on black holes and quasars.  Please review them and provide a technical basis for your claims.

https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/4233096
https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/4259251
http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2017/pub/fermilab-pub-17-038-ae.pdf
http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2015/pub/fermilab-pub-15-341-ae.pdf
http://courses.ncssm.edu/math/NCSSM%20Student%20Materials/InvestigationsTrimester%203/Moon.pdf

Why do you have to be so arrogant and obnoxious in your post? Does it make you happy?

Thanks - for your nonsense. You sound like Stephen Hawking, the biggest fraud in cosmology that I describe at my website http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm . Stephen, a Cambridge physics professor, discovered Black Holes in space, even if they are so small and dense that they cannot be seen. He fooled anyone at Cambridge, which is quite easy. Then Stephen announced that he was ill  - ALS - and would die after a year ... but that was >30 years ago. Stephen is still around and media thinks he is a hero. But he is just a snake oil vendor. I always have a good laugh at Stephen.

Quote from: MicroBeta on June 28, 2017, 05:17:30 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on June 28, 2017, 03:29:01 AM

Space travel is complicated. First you have to get into high speed orbit around Earth and from there into another higher speed orbit or variable speed/direction trajectory to reach the Moon or Mars that you probably orbit before slowing down to land on. Earth gravity really slows you down getting away. The return trip is similar. You take off into orbit Moon or Mars and from there you speed off into another orbit or trajectory to return to Earth. As soon as you are subject to Earth gravity, you go faster and faster towards the center of Earth and then you have to re-enter and land. It seems nobody knows how to calculate the fuel required for all these maneuvers for any trip and that one or the big problem is to take off with all the fuel aboard at the beginning. Actually it is not possible at all.

You make some interesting claims in this post.  Similar to claims you make on your website.  However, it’s well established that we can and do send vehicle into space.  Even so far as to impact a comet on the Deep Impact project. 

There is more than a century of peer reviewed papers, journals, college text books, and actual launches/missions.  Since you make the extraordinary claim that none of this is possible I have to ask.  What is your technical basis?  What calculations or experiments support you opinion?

Here, I’ll help you out.  Your website states, in part, that the Juno mission would be impossible due to quasars and black holes.  Your site provides plenty of disparate facts and conclusions but provide no direct or sources for an analytical basis to show why the Juno mission would be impossible.  Here are a couple of papers on black holes and quasars.  Please review them and provide a technical basis for your claims.

https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/4233096
https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/4259251
http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2017/pub/fermilab-pub-17-038-ae.pdf
http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2015/pub/fermilab-pub-15-341-ae.pdf
http://courses.ncssm.edu/math/NCSSM%20Student%20Materials/InvestigationsTrimester%203/Moon.pdf

Thanks - for your nonsense. You sound like Stephen Hawking, the biggest fraud in cosmology that I describe at my website http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm . Stephen, a Cambridge physics professor, discovered Black Holes in space, even if they are so small and dense that they cannot be seen. He fooled anyone at Cambridge, which is quite easy. Then Stephen announced that he was ill  - ALS - and would die after a year ... but that was >30 years ago. Stephen is still around and media thinks he is a hero. But he is just a snake oil vendor. I always have a good laugh at Stephen.

As I always say. All space craft trips are one-way only. You can only carry fuel to reach the target, e.g. a certain orbit ... and that's it. You cannot stop, start again in space and come back and land on Earth.

Arianespace only sends very light spacecrafts (satellites) into orbits using plenty fuel and that is all. I explain it at http://heiwaco.com .

You on the other hand indicate that space travel with humans aboars is very easy jumping from orbits to orbits with stops and starts in betweeen and that fuel is no problem.

But you cannot even explain how to stop and start in space and the fuel required for it. Reason is that you cannot carry the fuel required to stop and start again in space. It is impossible.

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

As I always say. All space craft trips are one-way only. You can only carry fuel to reach the target, e.g. a certain orbit ... and that's it. You cannot stop, start again in space and come back and land on Earth.

Why would anyone want to stop and start in space? 

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

Arianespace only sends very light spacecrafts (satellites) into orbits using plenty fuel and that is all. I explain it at http://heiwaco.com .

But you aren't explaining how Ariane 5 ECA can carry enough fuel to put a 10.5 tonne satellite (not very light in my opinion) into low earth orbit and then transfer it into a much higher geostationary orbit.

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

You on the other hand indicate that space travel with humans aboars is very easy jumping from orbits to orbits with stops and starts in betweeen and that fuel is no problem.

When did I ever say any of that? 

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

But you cannot even explain how to stop and start in space and the fuel required for it. Reason is that you cannot carry the fuel required to stop and start again in space. It is impossible.

The reason that I never explain how to stop and start in space is because no one in their right mind would ever try such a stupid thing.  Slowing down and speeding up in space is a different story.

Quote from: markjo on June 28, 2017, 06:32:09 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

As I always say. All space craft trips are one-way only. You can only carry fuel to reach the target, e.g. a certain orbit ... and that's it. You cannot stop, start again in space and come back and land on Earth.

Why would anyone want to stop and start in space? 

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

Arianespace only sends very light spacecrafts (satellites) into orbits using plenty fuel and that is all. I explain it at http://heiwaco.com .

But you aren't explaining how Ariane 5 ECA can carry enough fuel to put a 10.5 tonne satellite (not very light in my opinion) into low earth orbit and then transfer it into a much higher geostationary orbit.

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

You on the other hand indicate that space travel with humans aboars is very easy jumping from orbits to orbits with stops and starts in betweeen and that fuel is no problem.

When did I ever say any of that? 

Quote from: Heiwa on June 27, 2017, 09:59:26 PM

But you cannot even explain how to stop and start in space and the fuel required for it. Reason is that you cannot carry the fuel required to stop and start again in space. It is impossible.

The reason that I never explain how to stop and start in space is because no one in their right mind would ever try such a stupid thing.  Slowing down and speeding up in space is a different story.

LOL - a space trip starts a 0 speed on Earth and ends at 0 speed on Earth and in the meantime you must stop and start at the target of the trip, e.g. the Moon. I clearly show at my web site that you cannot carry the fuel with you for such a trip and I offer anyone €1M to show I am wrong. You have failed my generous offer. Why do you instead just produce stupid, garbage posts?

LOL - a space trip starts a 0 speed on Earth and ends at 0 speed on Earth and in the meantime you must stop and start at the target of the trip, e.g. the Moon. I clearly show at my web site that you cannot carry the fuel with you for such a trip...