When you start looking for it, it really is staggering how much round earthers rely on cheap manipulation and fallacies in place of any actual argument.
You mean FEers.
FET doesn't have cult leaders.
Sure they do.
Row Boat.
Eric Dubay
Daniel Shenton.
They even have martyrs like Mike Hughes.
Tell me, which of those sounds like a cult to you?
FE. Due to the wilful rejection of evidence that shows they are wrong, and the complete inability to defend their claims; especially with how they love their deflection.
You can even see this with you.
Notice how this thread was meant to be about the moon landing.
Yet instead of even attempt to discuss that, you just try to attack the RE as a cult.
You shouldn't even be asking which seems more like a cult.
Instead you should be asking which seems more like a rational, evidence based position?
When Neil Degrasse Tyson says something, you believe him because he said it.
No, we don't.
If he said the moon was made of cheese, we wouldn't accept it.
At least not most of us.
Instead we evaluate the claim based upon our current understanding of the world, including the available evidence.
who do you think 'Flat Earth Clues!' is aimed at, people that already think the world is flat, or people who disagree and want to debunk supposed clues?
Both, especially to allow those FEers to pretend their position is justified.
When a prominent flat earther says something, the response is massively divided
Almost as if FE is pure nonsense, and the division comes from all the contradictions needed to try to pretend the FE matches reality.
The same applies with loads of religions.
Go and ask Christians what they think of homosexuality or slavery or what a woman's place should be.
Some will try to use the Bible to justify outdated, archiac views, that homosexuality is an abomination worthy of death, that slavery is fine and a woman belongs to her husband and should obey her.
Others will try to use the Bible to claim that it is wrong to oppose homosexuality in any way, and to try claiming that slavery is evil and should not be permitted and that women should be treated as equals to men.
That is a big problem with cults. They are not based upon truth, so when they get large enough, they fracture and you end up with a bunch of different groups all with contradictory claims.
The same applies to the FE.
It is now large enough to have people in one FE group go directly against those in another FE group.
Round Earthers say "You won't understand, but believe it anyway." Flat Earthers say "Here is the evidence."
Again, it is far more often the other way around.
REers provide evidence and explanations, while the FEers just dodge any request to do so, instead claiming that the REers are brainwashed fools that wouldn't understand.
These fora are a wonderful example of that.
That's the claim, though of course it doesn't work out - all it tests is fat content. High fat, melts. Low fat, burns.
And notice how when it is false you can provide a counter argument, one which can actually make sense.
But not so for the FE.
The vast majority of evidence presented by REers is met with dismissal or is completely ignored.
Conversely, the evidence presented by FEers is shown to be faulty.
So which side matches your "life hacks" more?
e.g. Earth must be flat, just go look out your window and it is clearly flat.
Or take a look at this tiny body of water, see how the surface of water is flat? Earth must be flat.
Pure nonsense that is trivial to expose as nonsense.