You need two poles for magnetic fields to operate. According to FE, one of those poles is off towards the rim and the magnetic field lines would be completely scewed (not to mention impossible). I could also mention the fact that the magnetic fields are what protect us from solar winds and prevent our atmosphere being wiped out, yet the FE model places the sun INSIDE the atmosphere. Can you imagine the effect a 32 mile diameter perpetual atomic explosion would have on all life on Earth? And let's not go the shrimp argument, because no-one here is 4 years old.
Where have I stated there was only one pole? Where have I said the sun was inside the atmoplane? Where does a FE say the poles are "Off towards the rim"?
More semantics? Answer the question as to how the poles could be arranged as you're suggesting. I don't care if an FE says where the poles are, we KNOW where they are. Currently the south pole, and it is a single point, not the entire rim, is off the coast of Antarctica. The FE model puts that point just inside the rim no matter whether you consider Antarctica as a continent or a wall. The north pole is somewhere near the centre of the disc. So, how can that be explained, a completely skewed magnetic field?
And the FAQ states the sun is 9000 feet above the disc. The atmosphere ends at 3.2million feet (1000km). The Magnetosphere has a minimum shield of 70,000km. I think you'll find that the FE theory places the sun well within either. Which means that it should have destroyed the Earth's surface long ago.
Of course its a single point. Clearly its not a rim. A rudimentary knowledge of magnets should be the first hint to that...
As I've said countless times, the south pole is at the North Pole, and the north pole is directly below the south pole. Exactly like a re. When this shifts, the apparent north pole moves, as does the apparent south pole.
Of course, if you want to get into fractal geographic theorem, its even simpler than that. In infinite frames, the south pole is below the North Pole; below the south pole is the north pole; in infinite parallel frames, the opposite is true; the South Pole, in these frames at the center of the disk, is above the north pole which is above the south pole. The collapse of this is identical to the magnetic field seen in the observable world.
I'm not arguing semantics at all. You simple don't seem to be understanding the theory. If you could be more useful in helping me pinpoint your confusion, I'd be happy to try to help you understand. Or if you could voice your objections to the theory more pointedly concerning configurations I've mentioned that would also be of help.