Don't worry, I found a better version:
Well that's clearly digitally edited, unlike mine.
You don't need much of an indication of height when it's viewed from far enough away to see all that.
Yes you do.
It could still be quite small.
There is also no indication of length, so how much is "all that" and "far enough away"?
I mean, yeah, that's kinda the whole point. What photo of an ice wall do you want that you couldn't pass off as an ice shelf?
One which is extremely tall, like a few km tall, as clearly visible by a scale on it (such as a person or a large ship), with it still going up and up and up.
Even better, get photos which can be unambiguously stitched together to produce a long continuous wall.
You are right, because all claims of the big fleat and the ice wall are pointless because expeditions have proven them wrong.
So close, and yet so far. You almost drew a logical conclusion, but instead you had to snap back to assuring everyone that "RET, RET, RET! Did I mention RET?"
We all know you're a REer, we all know you accept RET, so do I, but not every argument made for RET is a good one and not every post you make has to insist that RET is true.
Nope. No RET there (at least not explicitly)
REALITY! REALITY! REALITY!!!
Stop acting like appealing to reality it just appealing to RET.