Show Posts
1
Flat Earth General / Neutral and Objective Evidence Supporting Flat Earth
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:11:01 AM »
Flat Earth Theory like many theories, e.g., evolution, is disputed. One of the primary complaints of Round Earth Theorists raise against FET is the supposed lack of firm physical evidence supporting FET. Despite the numerous reliable works regarding this topic (which our dissenters just cannot seem to locate, willful ignorance?), adding more evidence can never be detrimental to our cause.
As noted by polymath and FE theorist Thomas Fabian Bishop, your eyes are extremely effective tools at gathering information about the environment in a format which our brains can then rapidly convert to understanding. He has used this concept as the logical basis for many of his defense strategies, most notably for the now famous “look out your window” defense. Extending upon these grown breaking paradigm shifts in scientific understanding, I humbly bring my own independent support for FE.
Below I have several photographs of the horizon over the Pacific Ocean. Although I am of the belief that photographs are not a reputable medium for recoding information, they were particularly convenient for me to use; they can only grant further credence for FE.
To paint an adequately accurate picture of the scene, I must give some auxiliary environmental information. When these photographs were taken the cameras elevation ranged between 2.132452-3.215422 meters above sea level (it was a calm day). My eye level also was confined to a similar range. The air temperature ranged between the low of 289.323193 and 291.123048 K. The humidity was around 50.432762%. I did not notice any curvature of the horizon, that entire duration of the scientific voyage (approximately 12 hours).
I recorded several photos (as I mentioned earlier), which do depict curvature albeit slight. Now we have two seemingly contradictory pieces of evidence. However, applying Occam’s razor can sometimes yield unexpected results. In this case, it has granted us a fantastic tidbit of insight into the inner-working of our universe; affording us a precious token of understanding from which we can furbish our great FE knowledge tree.
It is extremely well documented that mans judgment is less than perfect. Thus most designs stemming from man will also inherit this imperfection. In contrast, devices designed by god, e.g., life, are perfect. If we were to accept this, then we would inevitably conclude that the cameras perception was more likely to be flawed than my eyes. After recording several photographs, the source of this error became readily apparent. My camera was not particularly expensive, thus its lens quality is substandard. As the evidence supporting that my camera had a flaw ammased, I simply had no choice but to investigate. After thorough investigation it became clear that my camera was subject to a manufacturing related defect, which warped the recorded image very slightly. It now became clear that my earlier suspicions were in fact true. Knowing this, I present you these photos; despite their slight warp you can really tell how flat the earth is!
Also, I have more photos and I will show them upon request.
As noted by polymath and FE theorist Thomas Fabian Bishop, your eyes are extremely effective tools at gathering information about the environment in a format which our brains can then rapidly convert to understanding. He has used this concept as the logical basis for many of his defense strategies, most notably for the now famous “look out your window” defense. Extending upon these grown breaking paradigm shifts in scientific understanding, I humbly bring my own independent support for FE.
Below I have several photographs of the horizon over the Pacific Ocean. Although I am of the belief that photographs are not a reputable medium for recoding information, they were particularly convenient for me to use; they can only grant further credence for FE.
To paint an adequately accurate picture of the scene, I must give some auxiliary environmental information. When these photographs were taken the cameras elevation ranged between 2.132452-3.215422 meters above sea level (it was a calm day). My eye level also was confined to a similar range. The air temperature ranged between the low of 289.323193 and 291.123048 K. The humidity was around 50.432762%. I did not notice any curvature of the horizon, that entire duration of the scientific voyage (approximately 12 hours).
I recorded several photos (as I mentioned earlier), which do depict curvature albeit slight. Now we have two seemingly contradictory pieces of evidence. However, applying Occam’s razor can sometimes yield unexpected results. In this case, it has granted us a fantastic tidbit of insight into the inner-working of our universe; affording us a precious token of understanding from which we can furbish our great FE knowledge tree.
It is extremely well documented that mans judgment is less than perfect. Thus most designs stemming from man will also inherit this imperfection. In contrast, devices designed by god, e.g., life, are perfect. If we were to accept this, then we would inevitably conclude that the cameras perception was more likely to be flawed than my eyes. After recording several photographs, the source of this error became readily apparent. My camera was not particularly expensive, thus its lens quality is substandard. As the evidence supporting that my camera had a flaw ammased, I simply had no choice but to investigate. After thorough investigation it became clear that my camera was subject to a manufacturing related defect, which warped the recorded image very slightly. It now became clear that my earlier suspicions were in fact true. Knowing this, I present you these photos; despite their slight warp you can really tell how flat the earth is!
Also, I have more photos and I will show them upon request.
