1
Announcements / Re: I am back
« on: June 03, 2025, 10:15:19 PM »
Yeah we got it the first time, the dig is I'm a computer scientist and you think I'm a narcissist. The horse is dead, why do you keep beating it so much?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
try:
enable("SelfWorth")
disable("ExternalValidation")
upgrade("Boundaries")
except:
print("Compatibility with 'Wise' not implemented.")
apply("GracefulExit")
Its actually a description by a world famous scientific expert of round earthers. Paul Feyerabend iirc. If you are interested I'll dig up the book.Quote"They won't listen. Do you know why? Because they have certain fixed notions ... Any change would be blasphemy in their eyes, even if it were the truth. They don't want the truth; they want their traditions."
This was a perfect depiction (intentional or not?) of flat-earthers. Who appeal to ancient civilizations that regarded the Earth as flat. Who quote the Book of Enoch as a reliable source.
While, on the other side:
Who breaks with the traditional idea of an Earth at the center of the universe? Copernicus.
Who breaks with the traditional idea of planets' orbits being necessarily circular? Kepler.
Who breaks with the traditional (Aristotelian) idea of bodies of different weight falling at different rates? Galileo.
Who introduces the totally non-traditional idea of action at a distance? Newton.
Who introduces the totally non-traditional idea of light being an undulation? Huygens.
Who breaks with the traditional theory of phlogiston? Lavoisier.
Who breaks with the traditional idea of animal species being fixed and immutable? Darwin.
Who breaks with the traditional idea of spontaneous generation of life? Pasteur.
Who breaks with the traditional idea of an absolute time? Einstein.
Who breaks with the traditional idea of geometry of space being necessarily Euclidean? Einstein, again (but already a century before the great mathematician Gauss had posed the question and had set out to measure the angles defined by three mountaintops, to see whether their sum was indeed 180°).
Who breaks with the traditional idea of a universe being static and basically unchanging with time? Hubble and Lemaître.
Not to mention quantum mechanics, where the traditional, natural and apparently self-evident idea that a particle, at any given time, has a definite position in space must be totally abandoned.
So now, WHO is desperately clinging to their traditions?
Indeed, that's why science is hated by so many. It disrupts traditional, comfortable ideas and beliefs. Like that nature is still an “out there”, stronger than us, against which we can manly fight without the fear of “toppling the boat” - that is, polluting the environment, destroying ecosystems, exhausting natural resources, altering the very climate of the planet. No more dreaming of ever bigger cars? No, it MUST be a conspiracy, like the Covid hoax, like the vaccine scam, like the 15-minutes cities, to keep us caged and controlled!
As so many times in history. Famines were caused by hoarders, plagues by “untori” (plague spreaders) or Jews, other natural calamities by some inconsiderate member of the community who had somehow offended the gods. It's always been highly comfortable to think that it's enough to get rid of the offender or to topple the conspiracy to get everything all right again.
Interesting insight. Has anyone been to antichone?Eh, she wasn't my type; she was a bit too into death and defiance for my taste. Great at standing up to authority, terrible at dinner parties.
Weight is a force? It seems like its just the tendency of things to follow their natural trajectory.Force = mass * acceleration. Weight = mass * gravitational acceleration. Weight is a force.The force of my weight? What do you mean by that, because that sounds like inertia with extra steps.Let's say I'm in an elevator in the middle of space far away from any gravity. No windows. The elevator is accelerating upwards. What is holding me to the floor? My inertia countering the elevator rising.No. The normal force of elevator's floor counters the force of your weight due to the elevator's acceleration. Come now, you're supposed to be better than this.
Unfortunately, we don't have the technology to bioengineer animals. It would be fantastic, but we don't know enough about living things to do that. It would be completely unrealistic to think that humans have the technology to do this today. Realize that the ability to model living things like this would involve much more than just penguins.We have been bio-engineering animals since the beginning of time. Ever enjoy a steak? Or perhaps you are sitting next to your man's best friend.
I don't share Dubay's commitment to veganism (the Zizians, and Hitler himself were at least vegetarian, and veganism means animals get put down since farms raise animals as part of their business). Nor do I agree with his stance on Judaism. He should stick to flat Earth, and not push Nazism.Honestly, his FE work isn't very impressive either from what I've read. His Flat Earth Conspiracy book is just a mix of copy pastes from our library uncredited uncited mixed with his own beyond ridiculous nonsense.
The issue is they treat science like dogma.Meaning that it would not be considered reasonable to doubt it.Settled science gets doubted and challenged all the time
Never mind genetic engineered. We basically only ever see them in enclosures in zoos. How do we know that the land they supposedly exist in exists?I took the pictures early in the thread and can confirm they exist in South America. I was denied access to the Antarctic so could not verify that.
For that matter, how do we know they can survive in such a place? I mean, fur seems like it would work better than feathers for staying warm, and as best as I know, moving a polar bear south would likely kill it. Someone mentioned moving them to the Antarctic as response to the melting ice pictures (which it turns out is a hoax)The thing about penguins is they seem like they are almost engineered to survive the climate as portable food sources. Heavy in fat and protein, they are both well insulated and a walking army ration. They are dull witted, with records of early discoverers noting how they would just horde onto the boat to be slaughtered for meal. They also serve to harvest the natural fish and transform that to transferable energy that would otherwise be very problematic to do so in the climate.
https://newslog.cyberjournal.org/global-warming-fraud-iconic-polar-bear-on-melting-ice-cap-a-hoax/
and we got this article:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/would-polar-bears-thrive-antarcticaQuoteIan - Polar bears would do very well if transplanted into the Antarctic - well at least for a few years. From a food point of view it would be polar bear heaven. In the Arctic the seals and other potential prey species have evolved lifestyles that minimises their risk of being eaten by polar bears but, in contrast, larger Antarctic animals such as seals and penguins have evolved without the risk of being eaten. Because of this the penguins are typically quite bold and inquisitive and will often approach you to have a look, and seals in the Antarctic range in behaviour from total indifference to outright aggression.Which further points out the oddity of all this. A bird with no survival instinct about avoiding predators?
Forgot about this thread. Highlights Dubay is a con and douchebag.Yeah we all knew that here. Tfes.org tried to make him their president. Because Thork.
There is historical basis for flat earthers believing in it due to biblicism. Many do today, you might have seen them on youtube. We subscribe to science here. I'm the president of the society, and here's an article in which I talk to it a bit.
https://www.pastemagazine.com/tech/a-conversation-with-a-flat-earth-believer
How do gravity and space function in the context of a flat Earth model?