first... the horizen is always at eye level... period... go in a plane or on top of mount everest...
Maybe we're talking about different things. Presuming that you're just misspelling horiz
on, then how can you tell if it's below level or not?
From an airplane flying at 10,000 meters above sea level, the sea-level horizon will be about 3° below level. If you're using the horizon itself as the reference for level, then there's your mistake; if not, what
are you using to establish level? How careful is your measurement of the angle to the horizon?
second... the rectillinator expiriment is more reliable then the new ones cause <conspiracy theory>
Nope. The rectilineator (presuming another misspelling on your part) assumes, among other things, that four miles worth of bolted-together 12'-long wooden beams, assembled along a beach and over water, are perfectly straight. 'nuff said. No need to go into lizards, Nazis and Freemasons.
third... nazis believen this...
Citation, please.
even wach vsauce...
What?? Did you mean "Ever watch Vsauce?"
No. Why?
forth... they do... look up at the sky...
They do what?
As an avid amateur astronomer, I look up at the sky quite often.
fith... the refraction of light bends around from the sun like a curved light...
... due to continuously-changing density of air. So?
Are you trying to make flat-earth types look smart in comparison to you by intentionally making incoherent or barely-coherent posts offering a different model? It'll take more than that.