Firstly I would like to thank Dr Bill for finally putting this whole matter to rest once and for all. It's all there! A small section of the Ice Wall, looking resplendent (and certainly appearing to be made of ice), Bigfoot looking a little out of place (they don't normally venture that close to the edge) and an ostrich of unknown hue, probably turquoise. I don't think you would find National Geographic going to the trouble of setting up an Ice Wall Cam if there was no wall to point their cam at. The fact that the images are sponsored by two such reputable sponsors as The United Nations and NASA (who are clearly trying to put all of that messy Moon business behind them) pretty much clinches it.
Now that we've established the existence of the Ice Wall, we can get on to the more pressing matter of the non-existence of Tim the Enchanter.
So, why does he have to prove his existence, before you'll be willing to debate with him about the nature of the Ice Wall? Do you feel that the nature of the Ice Wall depends on whether or not Tim the Enchanter exists?
Well, in the light of Dr Bill's groundbreaking evidence, it is questionable if it even matters whether or not this thing called "Tim" exists. However, since you have raised the question intelligently and respectfully, along with the fact that you have proven your own existence by presenting a photo of yourself as your avatar, I will agree to continue this debate.
For the sake of the argument, I shall refer to him as "Timmy," and I would like you to think of him as being similar to a small child's imaginary friend. In fact, I believe that to some extent Timmy IS a small chilld's imaginary friend. So, this Timmy thinks he exists, because in his formless state, he hears the small child saying things like "Don't sit there Mom, Timmy's sitting there," or "Mom, Timmy wants some dinner too." After some time passes, Timmy starts to believe that he actually exists outside of the imagination of aforementioned small child. Of course, he cannot really think nor hear, so in fact, he is a non entity imagining that he is an imaginary friend. Even the small child is a figment of his imagination. Therefore he is imagining that he is an imaginary friend of an imaginary small child. Now, why the fuck would I want to argue with some-non-one like that?
Assuming he doesn't exist, how would that make his argument any less valid? (Maybe it's invalid for other reasons, but they're not interesting in this context.) I assert that you believe that at the very least his posts exist, since you quoted them in your reply.
You may well assert and assume, but the fact is, there is no Timmy. I believe that uncaused causes are rampant throughout the universe and that coherent, human-scale events (such as several paragraphs of readable text) regularly occur for no reason, i.e., completely at random. I call this the "Timmy Phenomenon" and I cite the case of Timmy as proof.
Do you also believe that uncaused causes are rampant throughout are universe? That is, do you believe that coherent, human-scale events (such as several paragraphs of readable text) regularly occur for no reason, i.e., completely at random? If you do believe this, then I suppose nobody can dissuade you of your belief in the Ice Wall, though I suppose we could have a separate line of discussion about this particular belief.
I believe I have already answered this....
I don't guarantee that Tim is a *person*
I think that would be wise.
To summarize:
1) Why is it important to you that Tim prove his existence?
2) You ought to argue against the claim "The Ice Wall does not exist," even if you do not believe that a person made that claim.
1)Honestly, its not important that Timmy proves his existence, except to himself. I just wanted to humour the non-entity who was imagining himself to be an imaginary small child's imaginary friend. Surely you can understand that this was in fact an act of compassion, sent out without discrimination against the non-existent. I'm just trying to do what I believe to be right here.
2)In light of the new evidence, there is no further need to argue against the imaginary ramblings of the non-existent. We should all just look at the photos, enjoy them, and have a little rest.
L.A.P.