In that demented brain of your Heiwa, what do you suppose was the motive for blowing it up?
The criminals operating the ship didn't want to share the profits. Blackmail/extortion as usual.
Share the profits from what?
You have to visit my website where I describe the Estonia crime 1992/4 ending in the sinking by sabotage of the ship killing >a 1000 people.
I have, unfortunately, visited your dumpster fire of a site and you don't have any evidence of sabotage.
In 2021, investigators from the Estonian Safety Investigation Bureau thought the damage on the starboard side of the MS Estonia’s wreck was 22 metres long, but now they see it extends to more than 40 metres.
I have heard about the alleged 22-40 metres damage on the starboard side (deck house) but it is below the mud of the sea floor and cannot be seen at all. The Estonians are lying as usual. The damages that sank the ship due to sabotage is at deck #0 level of the hull above the mud.
Not true.
No, it is true. The Estonians haven't shown any pictures of the deck house starboard side as it is in the mud. Anyway ships do not float on deck houses full of windows. When the ship sank upside down it was the deck house that touched bottom first. The complete hull is above the bottom mud. Thanks for your interest in this sabotage that I have followed since 1994. Visit my popular website about it - heiwaco
Why do you care so much about this particular tragedy? Did you know anyone on board? And how many people believe as you do?
I just happened to know the chief investigator, BS, of the incident/tragedy 1994. I knew him since 1990. We met regularly and discussed the matter. I found immediately that he knew what had happened, sabotage, and was lying about everything. My mother suggested that I write an article about it, which was published in the biggest Swedish daily DN August 1996. It was scandal and poor BS didn't want to see me again in spite of the fact that we worked together in an UN committee about oil spills at sea since 1990. The problem was solved! BS was declared dead in February 1997. He disappeared! And I got to know survivors of the incident. They said they believed me.
This is your "evidence":
I suggested to Stenström to check the intact stability of the Estonia with water in the superstructure - the ship would have capsized and floated upside down. Stenström went pale and told me that I didn't know what it was all about. Then Stenström never wanted to discuss the accident. I found it disturbing. We worked at the IMO checking oil tanker incidents and how to improve oil tanker safety and reduce oil spills and how to improve safety by better design but Stenström didn't want to discuss a recent ferry accident.
Hilarious. Were you a part of the investigation? No. He didn't want to discuss it because he couldn't discuss it. Way too much liability, $$$, politics, etc., to be disclosing the inner sanctum of the investigation to a lackey like you. He also told you he didn't want to speak to you again about the matter. Probably because he knew you were a little "touched", as they say.
You're "evidence" is that he went "pale".
Again, hilarious.
No, we also discussed other incidents, i.e. oil spills due to tanker groundings and collisions since 1990 and then Stenström was appointed also to investigate Estonia 1994, etc. Stenström established that the bow visor had dropped off ripping open a bow ramp, so the ship sank, while the crew saw a closed ramp all the time, etc, etc. Interesting case. It is still being discussed. Stenström suddenly died during the investigation and a Mrs Eksborg took over the investigation. She had never investigated a ship incident in her life, etc, etc.