Solar Size

  • 471 Replies
  • 74433 Views
*

Gabe

  • 485
Solar Size
« on: February 25, 2008, 11:27:50 AM »
The other thread I posted this in was ignored and others cluttered it so I am dedicating it to its own thread.
Quote from: Gabe



Looking at the sun at all stages in the sky (through the glass) it always appears to be the same size.

The FE explanation for the sun not changing in size is glare and projection on light onto the atmosphere. These pictures disprove such a notion. Is this a flaw in FET?
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

Re: Solar Size
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2008, 11:38:25 AM »

*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2008, 11:57:38 AM »
This was actually in response to that. ;)

Let me elaborate: Since the FE sun has to cover a lot of distance and is very close to the Earth in order to function, it also would have to change in size drastically as it  got very far away.

"Glare is causing the size of the sun to stay steady even though it should shrink." explains the size, but you can filter out enough glare to see the actual size, and see it doesn't really change. Because the sun's size doesn't perceptibly change, the distance to the sun must be changing by an insignificant percentage.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Jimmy911

  • 89
  • FES: Human Intelligence Reversal
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2008, 02:46:08 PM »
This was actually in response to that. ;)

Let me elaborate: Since the FE sun has to cover a lot of distance and is very close to the Earth in order to function, it also would have to change in size drastically as it  got very far away.

"Glare is causing the size of the sun to stay steady even though it should shrink." explains the size, but you can filter out enough glare to see the actual size, and see it doesn't really change. Because the sun's size doesn't perceptibly change, the distance to the sun must be changing by an insignificant percentage.
Shouldn't someone bump this? It's a very good point...BUMP!
2÷2=Round Earth
2÷0=Flat Earth

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 9074
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2008, 10:52:32 AM »
A thread will only be answered by a FEer, if an FE answer exists.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2008, 10:03:46 AM »
Bump. This is not rhetorical.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17934
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2008, 10:31:22 AM »
How would a dark glass eliminate the sun's projection if the projection of the sun's light is upon the semi-transparent strata of the atmosphere?

?

fshy94

  • 1560
  • ^^^ This is the Earth ...die alien invaders!!
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2008, 10:50:29 AM »
Exactly. Yet it did! Amazing, huh?
Proof the Earth is round!
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=19341.0

Quote from: Althalus
The conspiracy has made it impossible to adequately explain FE theory in English.
^^LOL!

*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2008, 10:52:19 AM »
Projection is not still nor is it distinct, espesically on an almost invisible medium. FE sun theory only works if glare masks it. The sun cannot be distinct without glare unless it is not being projected.

It doesn't eliminate projection from the equation,
it shows it isn't a significant part in this equation at all.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17934
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2008, 11:36:53 AM »
Exactly. Yet it did! Amazing, huh?

No, actually the dark glass did not eliminate the projection upon the atmosphere, which is why the sun is not a tiny dot in the second image.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2008, 12:21:50 PM »
Exactly. Yet it did! Amazing, huh?

No, actually the dark glass did not eliminate the projection upon the atmosphere, which is why the sun is not a tiny dot in the second image.
The atmosphere will only distort the sun once.  Will in a consistent medium the object will not change.  And for the most part the atmosphere is consistent.  The fe sun should get smaller but it never does.   
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17934
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2008, 10:04:52 PM »
Quote
And for the most part the atmosphere is consistent.  The fe sun should get smaller but it never does.

No it's not. There is more atmosphere in the way the farther the sun recedes from the observer. Therefore there is a greater area for the sun's light to shine upon as the sun moves away.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2008, 09:14:47 AM by Tom Bishop »

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2008, 12:29:42 AM »
Quote
And for the most part the atmosphere is consistent.  The fe sun should get smaller but it never does.

No it's not. There is more atmosphere in the way the farther the sun recedes from the observer.therefore there is a greater area for the sun's light to shine upon as the sun moves away.

You don't understand optics. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Jimmy911

  • 89
  • FES: Human Intelligence Reversal
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2008, 03:51:28 PM »
I have a solar filter from my telescope. Maybe I'll take a picture through it and show the true size of the sun...the same size it is all day.
2÷2=Round Earth
2÷0=Flat Earth

*

Dead Kangaroo

  • FES' Anchor Roo
  • The Elder Ones
  • 4551
  • K800 Model 101.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2008, 04:17:59 PM »
The fe sun should get smaller but it never does.   
Therefore your perception of the FE model fails.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2008, 06:07:59 PM »
The fe sun should get smaller but it never does.   
Therefore your perception of the FE model fails.
Its called reading. 

Quote from: sokarul
You don't understand optics.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2008, 06:39:42 PM »
And for the most part the atmosphere is consistent.     
Since when?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

fshy94

  • 1560
  • ^^^ This is the Earth ...die alien invaders!!
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2008, 06:43:08 PM »


Straight as a razor, eh Engy?
Proof the Earth is round!
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=19341.0

Quote from: Althalus
The conspiracy has made it impossible to adequately explain FE theory in English.
^^LOL!

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2008, 06:46:26 PM »
And for the most part the atmosphere is consistent.     
Since when?
Since never, but you don't have the gradient like you do between water and air. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2008, 06:51:51 PM »
And for the most part the atmosphere is consistent.     
Since when?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2008, 06:52:48 PM »


Straight as a razor, eh Engy?
It must be a new soka-rule.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #21 on: March 05, 2008, 06:57:21 PM »
Since never, but you don't have the gradient like you do between water and air. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #22 on: March 05, 2008, 06:58:00 PM »
So it is not consistent, then?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #23 on: March 05, 2008, 07:00:44 PM »
So it is not consistent, then?
No, but it is still consistent enough to null tom's argument.  That is why I quoted his argument.  That is also why I said for the most part. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #24 on: March 05, 2008, 07:37:46 PM »


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #25 on: March 05, 2008, 08:19:01 PM »

What part of that is mostly?
The part where you didn't know optics.  Waters density is 1 g/cm^3 to airs .000000009g/cm^3.  What is bigger, the difference between 1 and 1E-9 or 1E-9 and 1E-6?
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

fshy94

  • 1560
  • ^^^ This is the Earth ...die alien invaders!!
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #26 on: March 05, 2008, 09:08:27 PM »
Fair point, but what are we talking about? It would tend to curve the light very slightly, I suppose, but I'm not sure whether the magnitude we're dealing with is significant to do what Tom claims in the least.
Proof the Earth is round!
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=19341.0

Quote from: Althalus
The conspiracy has made it impossible to adequately explain FE theory in English.
^^LOL!

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #27 on: March 05, 2008, 09:10:45 PM »
Fair point, but what are we talking about? It would tend to curve the light very slightly, I suppose, but I'm not sure whether the magnitude we're dealing with is significant to do what Tom claims in the least.
Tom is claiming something way out in left field. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #28 on: March 06, 2008, 07:11:19 AM »
The part where you didn't know optics.  Waters density is 1 g/cm^3 to airs .000000009g/cm^3.  What is bigger, the difference between 1 and 1E-9 or 1E-9 and 1E-6?
When did I say anything about optics?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #29 on: March 06, 2008, 12:29:38 PM »
The part where you didn't know optics.  Waters density is 1 g/cm^3 to airs .000000009g/cm^3.  What is bigger, the difference between 1 and 1E-9 or 1E-9 and 1E-6?
When did I say anything about optics?
This argument started becasue of optics. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.