« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Creationist Cosmology

  • 7 Replies
  • 2787 Views
*

Euclid

  • 943
  • +0/-0
Creationist Cosmology
« on: April 29, 2009, 05:21:33 PM »
Logged
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)
*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • +0/-0
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2009, 09:23:49 PM »
That's pretty interesting.  I'm not smrt enough to understand where he got that huge line element for an expanding universe, though, so I can't comment on that.  Even if the Earth is "young" that does not mean creationism is correct, though...
Logged
?

Proleg

Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2009, 09:34:51 PM »
Seems fairly water-tight to me.
Logged
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2009, 03:47:12 PM »
Yet even the vatican doesn't believe in this. Odd.
Logged
*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11857
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2009, 06:20:53 PM »
Quote from: EvilToothpaste on April 30, 2009, 09:23:49 PM
That's pretty interesting.  I'm not smrt enough to understand where he got that huge line element for an expanding universe, though, so I can't comment on that.  Even if the Earth is "young" that does not mean creationism is correct, though...
[/b]

Why not?  You don't have the proper time needed for evolution of man, in young earth theory.
Logged
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2009, 06:33:46 PM »
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE on May 02, 2009, 06:20:53 PM
Quote from: EvilToothpaste on April 30, 2009, 09:23:49 PM
That's pretty interesting.  I'm not smrt enough to understand where he got that huge line element for an expanding universe, though, so I can't comment on that.  Even if the Earth is "young" that does not mean creationism is correct, though...
[/b]

Why not?  You don't have the proper time needed for evolution of man, in young earth theory.

The fact is, you don't even have enough time for the amount of evolution creationists claim if the Earth is young.
Logged
*

Euclid

  • 943
  • +0/-0
Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2009, 06:52:36 PM »
Quote from: Raist on May 02, 2009, 03:47:12 PM
Yet even the vatican doesn't believe in this. Odd.

Well, I was hoping for some legitimate criticism.

The theory claims to answer all of the modern unknowns in cosmology, which is why it is interesting.  How it does so is very poorly explained, which makes it suspicious.
Logged
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Creationist Cosmology
« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2009, 07:05:19 PM »
Quote from: Euclid on May 02, 2009, 06:52:36 PM
Quote from: Raist on May 02, 2009, 03:47:12 PM
Yet even the vatican doesn't believe in this. Odd.

Well, I was hoping for some legitimate criticism.

The theory claims to answer all of the modern unknowns in cosmology, which is why it is interesting.  How it does so is very poorly explained, which makes it suspicious.

I'm thinking it is a little reviewed idea that gets espoused on wikipedia by its followers. The fact than a completely comprehensive theory of the universe is not mainstream says something about its legitimacy. I don't understand it well enough to criticize it, but I'll bet it has some obvious flaw or inconsistency in it.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »