So I take it by your continued avoidance of the topic that you fully accept that star atlases prove that Earth is round, that you know Earth is not flat, and you are here lying to everyone with each post you make where you pretend it is?
So why don’t the sun and moon fully eclipse with one smaller in size than the other, if they’re both different in size and distance from Earth?
Because of the fact that Earth's orbit around the sun and the Moon's orbit around Earth is elliptical, sometimes the angular size of the moon is smaller than the sun and some times it is bigger.
Instead of just trying to turn the question back on me, how about you explain how we have annular eclipses?
These prove beyond any doubt that the moon is closer and smaller than the sun.
Every time they eclipse, each one eclipses the other at the exact same size.
They don't.
That is a blatant lie from you.
Firstly, again, the moon is not eclipsed by the sun, it is the sun being eclipsed by Earth blocking the light on the moon.
And that is nothing like the same size.
But potentially more importantly, during a solar eclipse THEY ARE NOT EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE!!!
If they were, totality would last an instant, the region of totality would be infinitely thin.
The fact that during a total solar eclipse the region of totality last a finite period of time, and the path of totality is 10s of km wide shows that the moon is appearing LARGER than the sun.
How is that possible if they’re so radically different in size and distance from Earth?
A child can understand this:
The moon should look like a tiny black speck in front of the huge moon for when the moon is on front of the Sun, which it always WOULD be in front of based on your distances.
Why?
While the moon is smaller, it is also much closer. Much like how you can bring your hands to your eyes to block your view of a much larger mountain in the distance, the closer moon can block out the much larger sun.
A Sun that is 93 million miles away from Earth would NEVER eclipse soon only 250000 miles away, it is physically impossible
Care to demonstrate that physical impossibility, because basic geometry says you are wrong.
The fact you can go inside and have the sun blocked out shows you are wrong.
The Sun is slightly further away from Earth than the moon, at least when the moon eclipses the Sun. Everyone knows they don’t collide
Which demonstrates your claim is pure BS.
They are NOT exactly the same distance away.
So if you want to claim they are the exact same angular size, you need to appeal to that same "magical" coincidence, just with different distances.
Guess I need to spell it out like I’m speaking to children next time
Or you could just try being honest for once in your life, rather than blatantly lying to pretend the RE model needs magic.
There is only one eclipse
Blatantly rejecting reality wont save you, especially when you are now just directly contradicting yourself as well.
There are quite clearly 2 types of eclipses, a solar eclipse and a lunar eclipse.
That would have three objects of different sizes and distances from one another magically appearing to all be the same size at the same time.
Again, if they "magically appeared" to be the exact same size, the duration of totality would be an instant.
Instead a total lunar eclipse typically lasts for more than an hour.
That shows the umbra part of Earth's shadow is much larger than the moon.
Oh well it fits the rest of this fairy tale nicely, too bad it has nothing to do with reality
You mean all your delusional BS? Certainly.
Meanwhile, the mainstream model of an eclipse certainly fits into reality and explains it quite well, with you unable to show a single fault.