My brother in law is a pilot and so is one of my longtime friends, among others I know as well.
I’ve had debates with pilots online, who defend the ball Earth lie and ‘curvature’. They’ve left the debate and didn’t return.
But theyve told me it’s flat, or else they’d be toast by now! Or way higher than they should’ve been anyway
Level flight is crucial to know and fly at, more so when flying over longer distances
Because you’re fucking loony.
Now.
Planes fly a level surface as defined by surveying when they stay at specific altitude.
If it takes more power to gain altitude, and an air plane is trimmed to fly at a certain altitude and doesn’t change power setting to create more lift. Why would it not stay at that altitude other than winds, turbulence, changes in air density from temperature?
You understand the internationally and professional acceptance of level surface for surveying, along with its use in construction, kills your delusion.
I’ve seen others who blow their stack about something I’ve said which rings true to them, yet fire off their internal conflict outward at me for saying it!
I’m certainly not a psychologist or psychiatrist, but I’ve always found the subject fascinating, had 98% grade for Psych 101, but didn’t continue for a degree or masters in the field for several reasons, but we all make choices we regret or wish didn’t have to happen.
The one, perhaps most important thing that I know, from years and years of personal experience, which couldn’t be known, or experienced by any professional of the field, nor could I or anyone else in their position.
That is all I’ll say about the topic, but I had to make it clear to you, and everyone else, to respect others, just because they disagree with what you believe or accept as true, just as I don’t agree with you, or many others on this and other issues, but do not hate or get angry or hurl out personal attacks, as you’ve done here.
As for those who are professional surveyors, who work every day with Earths surface, because - if you don’t really know at all, being it is never mentioned at all, for one reason, which I’ll explain.
Do you know the main purpose, the main reason we survey the Earths surface?
Surveying over Earths surface, anywhere on Earths surface, no matter HOW LARGE the area is, which they claim is only a ‘smaller’ area, all of which are real projects, of course.
Surveying of Earths surface would not even EXIST as it does today, if the entire surface of Earth was perfectly flat and level over it.
Why?
Because those who are surveying Earths surface, are looking and measuring for its FLATNESS and being level over those areas, which is what all surveyors want, and if it is NOT perfectly flat and level over those areas, being every bump or dip or curve or slant of a surface over Earth, makes it NOT flat and level
I’m very aware that if our surveyors believed Earths surface was actually curved, and it was curved at a measured rate over any distance over the surface..,.
It would most certainly be accounted for, measured over the entire area of projects, if it DID curve over the surface.
They measure the surface for how flat and level and horizontal it is, not ‘curvature’ of the surface!!
They measure for imperfections that are MUCH LESS than this supposed rate of ‘curvature’, so they obviously WOULD measure for it, if it really existed at all!
Why don’t you tell me exactly how they measure for curvature? They don’t, they know it doesn’t exist