Again, he's offered to go through the SOURCE - which would contain formulae. Which Anders has repeatedly and conveniently 'forgotten' and never explored.
He's also said that simulators exist so you don't have to waste expensive materials and possible loss of actual life just to find out say if their trajectory is proper. That's why they call it a simulator. The math is real, the objects are not. However being a simulator, those objects are modelled after real life. You know, to simulate.
So we're going back to the "deliver capsule to doorstep to win"?
It seems the alleged winner of Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge planned to go to the Moon and back. It is not easy as the Moon orbits the Earth that orbits the Sun at high speeds. He is using un unknown simulator. OK.
So at a certain time he departs Earth in a certain direction at a certain speed in 3-D space. The speed is immediately reduced due to Earth gravity and the direction is affected by the positions of the Moon and the Sun. It is assumed that the Moon is arriving in front of the space ship at the right time, so that Moon gravity attracts the space ship, which thus is going faster and faster towards the Moon, say >2 500 m/s = quite fast direction CoG of the Moon. The simulator takes care of everything. OK?
Now it is time to slow down. The simulator takes care of that too, I am told. I am mainly interested in the fuel used to brake. And that you brake in exactly the right direction. So far nobody has been able to explain how you do it. Not even NASA.
I like Tintin 1953. He just slowed down and landed on the Moon and reported it in a Belgian cartoon magazin. No videos, no CGI, no NASA. If Tintin says he is a winner of Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge, I will review the application.