Another Link

Here is a link to a new report involving all of the space junk around the earth. If you click on the one link on the left on the page you can see an animation showing the stuff accumulate from 1954 with sputnik up to 2000. Does this prove anything? To RE's it proves the earth round to FE's it proves the conspiracy i guess.

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESOC/SEMN2VM5NDF_mg_1.html

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

Tom's allowing pictures as evidence? That's almost as good as admitting defeat altogether.

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 10:25:34 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Evidence is not proof

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:05:56 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 10:25:34 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Evidence is not proof

He can't prove what isn't there, thats not my fault. That would be his...

Pictures are now proof.

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 11:15:40 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:05:56 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 10:25:34 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Evidence is not proof

He can't prove what isn't there, thats not my fault. That would be his...

Pictures are now proof.

He did not put those pictures forward as proof.  Proof is not evidence and vise versa

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:19:31 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 11:15:40 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:05:56 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 10:25:34 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Evidence is not proof

He can't prove what isn't there, thats not my fault. That would be his...

Pictures are now proof.

He did not put those pictures forward as proof.  Proof is not evidence and vise versa

The main purpose of this thread was to conclusively demonstrate that NASA is deliberately tampering with the images

How do you consclusively demonstrate something without proving something?

I know he uses pictures, he has for ages despite his claims they are not evidence.

I submit this, prove it is a fake.

Taking a leaf out of Tommy Boy's book, that pic is obviously fake, and in order to cover up the poor quality of the pic, they put in all of those clouds. Am I close Tommy?

...............13 days.

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 11:45:55 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:19:31 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 11:15:40 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:05:56 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 10:25:34 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Evidence is not proof

He can't prove what isn't there, thats not my fault. That would be his...

Pictures are now proof.

He did not put those pictures forward as proof.  Proof is not evidence and vise versa

Quote from: Tom Bishop

The main purpose of this thread was to conclusively demonstrate that NASA is deliberately tampering with the images

How do you consclusively demonstrate something without proving something?

To me, it seems there is no proof in science, just evidence.

Proof is for alcohol.  And math.  And alcoholic math.

While I can certainly identify with your personal views, proof can be anything from circumstantial to absolutely undeniable. It depends on the wielder.

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:52:19 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 11:45:55 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:19:31 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 11:15:40 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 11:05:56 AM

Quote from: Username on April 11, 2008, 10:25:34 AM

Quote from: Kill-9 on April 11, 2008, 07:59:24 AM

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/20080409.html

Here's some more. Beautiful pictures of Phobos. And since pictures are proof now (according to Tom), RE FTW.

Where did he say that? I must have missed it.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20282.0
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=20319.0
He uses photos as evidence there.

Evidence is not proof

He can't prove what isn't there, thats not my fault. That would be his...

Pictures are now proof.

He did not put those pictures forward as proof.  Proof is not evidence and vise versa

Quote from: Tom Bishop

The main purpose of this thread was to conclusively demonstrate that NASA is deliberately tampering with the images

How do you consclusively demonstrate something without proving something?

To me, it seems there is no proof in science, just evidence.

Proof is for alcohol.  And math.  And alcoholic math.

You are quite right, in science (except mathematics) there is no complete proof of anything.

While I can certainly identify with your personal views, proof can be anything from circumstantial to absolutely undeniable. It depends on the wielder.

Proof cannot be circumstantial.  That's ridiculous.  Evidence can be circumstantial but evidence is not the same thing as proof.  And nothing is undeniable (except, as has been pointed out, in mathematics).