I said it wasn't radioactive.
Can we be done talking about your lack of knowledge of nuclear fusion? What are these other bodies? Do they have life? Can we travel to them through the auroras?
i don't see how it couldn't be radioactive, but never mind.
if you want to move on, i'm happy to. talking in circles isn't any more fun for me.
we know other planets and bodies exist, and it seems reasonable to assume that other flat bodies have formed (and by extension similar planetary systems). i can't say anything about what happens there, though it's possible life exists there.
aurora travel is conceivable also, i suppose, though the aether is far less stable at those points, as it clearly fluctuates. it's only partly seen, after all. that being said, it might be possible that the auroras will 'line up' more at certain times, very rarely, allowing full travel. that might explain creatures which exist on earth, yet follow no clearly defined evolutionary path.
that is speculation, mind you.
First of all - you haven't explained how auroras work on your DFE model and repeating it infinitely doesn't make your idea true.
Second of all - every animal is defined by evolutionary paths, we just don't know exactly, but we know it CAN be defined by some probably true paths.
how have i not explained it? i suggest you go back to the first page of this thread, where i quite clearly explained what we observe as auroras come about, making no new assumptions about my model.
it is simply closed minded to say everything must have evolved here. there are many proposed creatures which do not quite seem to fit, often which have been observed enough to be sure they do exist, and yet don't exist in the quantities we would expect if they had truly evolve don earth.
You haven't explained it -
i suspect
What "creatures" you are talking about?
i have not personally been to the auroras, so i can say nothing for certain about their cause (or even if they exist), but they are easily explainable under dual earth theory. what part of that do you have a problem with?
i am not willing to discuss such creatures with you, as you've just been abrasive rather than open minded in other topics where they've come up.
What are the distant objects?
other worlds, perhaps. it's absurd to think the earth is all that exists. they're viewed unclearly as the transmission isn't perfect at those points, but they're there.
You're unclear. What other worlds? Other universes? Other planets? How are other planets or universes affecting our atmosphere that it makes auroras?
other planets. it's because of aetheric transmission, i suggest you actually read the posts. this was explained.
And how do other planets affect Earth?
what are you going on about now?
You've written that some distant planets affect our planet by affecting non-existing aetheric whirlpools and causing an aurora. And how do they affect?
what the hell are you talking about?! i've said the light from them is visible through thinner space. you're making this up as you go along.
don't even talk if you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Response is still the same - how the light visible through thinner space can affect our atmosphere to make auroras? If it was possible, then auroras would also be possible to observe near the equator.
what on earth are you talking about? i've never said that happens. please read the thread. the very title makes it clear, i do not accept the existence of a fantasy such as air, so there is no atmosphere. the visible light and thinner aether is the aurora.
If auroras are light mixed with thinner space, then why there are no auroras nearby equator? There is a thinner space also, according to you. And - if at poles there was a thinner space, why aren't we teleportated to another finish point of the place where the space is thin?
the aetheric whirlpools above the earth are centered at the poles, which are in the centers of the earth. if you look at a whirlpool, the center is smoother, pushed away: the center is the thinnest part, which is why auroras mainly occur at those points. it can occur elsewhere, but it is far rarer.
the auroras are not thin in the same was as the equator, it's constantly in motion there, which you can tell just from looking at an aurora. thinner space doesn't cause teleportation, it just means you can go further by crossing less distance. if an aurora is especially clear, it may be possible to travel further through it, but i don't know of anyone who routinely jumps into them, much less at the right times.