Quote from: markjo on November 21, 2014, 08:26:14 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 21, 2014, 01:10:32 PMWe would need 2 objects with the same buoyancy of different densities and the same volumes.Taken out of context. You're a dipshit.
Quote from: rottingroom on November 21, 2014, 01:10:32 PMWe would need 2 objects with the same buoyancy of different densities and the same volumes.
We would need 2 objects with the same buoyancy of different densities and the same volumes.
Quote from: rottingroom on November 21, 2014, 08:32:47 PMQuote from: markjo on November 21, 2014, 08:26:14 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 21, 2014, 01:10:32 PMWe would need 2 objects with the same buoyancy of different densities and the same volumes.Taken out of context. You're a dipshit.
Tappett, just go in a highrise hotel or condo at the beach. Go up 10 or 20 floors, you cannot miss the curve to the left and right. I am a flatearther, but the curve is unmistakable.
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
Quote from: rottingroom on November 21, 2014, 08:32:47 PMQuote from: markjo on November 21, 2014, 08:26:14 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 21, 2014, 01:10:32 PMWe would need 2 objects with the same buoyancy of different densities and the same volumes.Taken out of context. You're a dipshit.In what context is buoyancy not directly related to density?
Quote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 04:25:24 PMQuote from: sceptimatic on November 29, 2014, 03:55:27 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 03:43:22 PMPot boiling with lid on ____ Pot boiling with lid off <Let's look again.Yep, I do believe that's pointing to the lid on. What's the problem?
Quote from: sceptimatic on November 29, 2014, 03:55:27 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 03:43:22 PMPot boiling with lid on ____ Pot boiling with lid off <Let's look again.
Quote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 03:43:22 PMPot boiling with lid on ____ Pot boiling with lid off <
Pot boiling with lid on ____ Pot boiling with lid off
It's no slur if it's fact.
Quote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 04:32:46 PMQuote from: sceptimatic on November 29, 2014, 04:28:46 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 04:25:24 PMQuote from: sceptimatic on November 29, 2014, 03:55:27 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 03:43:22 PMPot boiling with lid on ____ Pot boiling with lid off <Let's look again.Yep, I do believe that's pointing to the lid on. What's the problem?Is this real? You don't know what a less than symbol is?Of course I do. I was using it as a simple pointer rather than playing less than, more than silliness. I know your game and you're wasting your time.
Quote from: sceptimatic on November 29, 2014, 04:28:46 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 04:25:24 PMQuote from: sceptimatic on November 29, 2014, 03:55:27 PMQuote from: rottingroom on November 29, 2014, 03:43:22 PMPot boiling with lid on ____ Pot boiling with lid off <Let's look again.Yep, I do believe that's pointing to the lid on. What's the problem?Is this real? You don't know what a less than symbol is?
Do you think that foil was ever made of tin? lol, you are more misinformed than I thought.
Some flat earthers have also disputed the speed of light and/or the speed of radio waves.
Aether is the characteristic of action or inaction of charged & noncharged particals.
Quote from: kman on January 29, 2015, 09:31:41 AMSo you're saying that iWitness genuinely wants to name the forum "Forum for Round-Earth Shills who spend every waking hour Desperately Trying to Convince Flat Earthers that their 500 year old Psuedo-Science is True when it's clearly Not".Are you saying he is not allowed to give us his thoughts?
So you're saying that iWitness genuinely wants to name the forum "Forum for Round-Earth Shills who spend every waking hour Desperately Trying to Convince Flat Earthers that their 500 year old Psuedo-Science is True when it's clearly Not".
[USA TODAY and NPR] are probaley just a bunch of flippin wite sapremist websites you RASCIST
i don't understand what you are saying=therfore you are liar
...Please can you tell me what you will do with the money when it doesn't reach $4m? I'm asking nicely, not demanding.Because I'll tell you now - I am seriously considering contacting the cops if this information is not forthcoming, because it is my genuine belief that this is fraud.
This one made me lol... a lot.Quote from: Dinosaur Neil on January 29, 2015, 11:11:48 AM...Please can you tell me what you will do with the money when it doesn't reach $4m? I'm asking nicely, not demanding.Because I'll tell you now - I am seriously considering contacting the cops if this information is not forthcoming, because it is my genuine belief that this is fraud.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.
Quote from: Pongo on January 29, 2015, 11:38:09 AMThis one made me lol... a lot.Quote from: Dinosaur Neil on January 29, 2015, 11:11:48 AM...Please can you tell me what you will do with the money when it doesn't reach $4m? I'm asking nicely, not demanding.Because I'll tell you now - I am seriously considering contacting the cops if this information is not forthcoming, because it is my genuine belief that this is fraud.DN gonna call the cops on Fflat Earth Society, of which he is member. They're gonna lock you up bro....but not as much as your admission that the claim that you had attracted $1300 in funding was complete bullshit made everyone else lol... a lot.
We can all learn a lot from Hoppy on the correct way to quote a post.
You do assume curvature[;] and curvature cannot be proved by trigonometry.I don't care if universities show it. All universities are in the case of Earth shape and space, etc, are just parroting the gibberish that is protocol.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a liar. Either is fine.
By, by heliocentricity!!!
It doesn't matter how old the Earth is. The Earth could not have existed before humans.
Quote from: Life Is Easy on January 31, 2015, 08:55:24 AMIt doesn't matter how old the Earth is. The Earth could not have existed before humans.
Because time is existence. And there can be no existence without love. Earth exists because of love.
Either a) several meteorites hit the Earth throughout history or b) advanced ETs periodically nuked the Earth for whatever reason. Either theory is perfectly valid
This is a serious forum. Lets all try and keep it as such.
Quote from: Pongo on February 10, 2015, 12:28:11 PMThis is a serious forum. Lets all try and keep it as such.I laughed so hard that blood leaked from my eyes.
how hard would it seriously be to get a plane to fly in a circle? fake stars ahoy.
i said that stars could be faked. any time they show the truth, that the earth is not round, it is a simple task to charter a plane to fly the route.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!
If the earth was a sphere there would be no mountains in Colorado. Mountains can't exist sideways. But mountains make perfect sense on a flat surface. The OP is correct, have you ever seen any observable spherical object that somehow feels and looks flat? The answer is no, The argument that a large enough sphere will look flat is ridiculous and was never tested.
Quote from: dephelis on February 19, 2015, 01:04:10 PMQuote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 19, 2015, 07:45:51 AMthe sun cannot shine on the moon at night. for round earthers, it's on the wrong side of the world. the moon is visible because it gives its own light, but it is similar to the sun: it is a spotlight, light coming from only one side. i have seen the aether spoken of here, and i believe that fills in the gaps in what i know, as it explains how the moon rotates so that only the illuminated side may face the earth. Then why is that we only see the same side of the moon with different quantities of illumination?if they look like the same face to you, you're blind.
Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 19, 2015, 07:45:51 AMthe sun cannot shine on the moon at night. for round earthers, it's on the wrong side of the world. the moon is visible because it gives its own light, but it is similar to the sun: it is a spotlight, light coming from only one side. i have seen the aether spoken of here, and i believe that fills in the gaps in what i know, as it explains how the moon rotates so that only the illuminated side may face the earth. Then why is that we only see the same side of the moon with different quantities of illumination?
the sun cannot shine on the moon at night. for round earthers, it's on the wrong side of the world. the moon is visible because it gives its own light, but it is similar to the sun: it is a spotlight, light coming from only one side. i have seen the aether spoken of here, and i believe that fills in the gaps in what i know, as it explains how the moon rotates so that only the illuminated side may face the earth.
I don't give that much of a shit about the Q&A forum.
Quote from: Dinosaur Neil on March 03, 2015, 10:32:31 AMI don't give that much of a shit about the Q&A forum.
The shadow of a sun dial does not move at a constant rate though. In the evenings it's longer than at noon. For this to happen the top of the shadow must move faster than the bottom of the shadow.