You just accept it because
Because of the plentiful evidence supporting it and nothing to refute it.
Magical is for your global mindset.
No, as clearly highlighted in plenty of the threads you have been on, you are the one which requires so much magic, all to pretend your irrational hatred of the globe is justified.
The horizon doesn't compress light, the atmosphere obscures objects that light reflects back off.
Which means you end up with the region of darkness like I demonstrated and you rejected.
Again, this means your nonsense does not match reality.
I'm not using technology that is built on a spinning globe fantasy.
It is based upon a spinning globe Earth REALITY!
You not liking that wont magically make it fantasy, no matter how much you hate it.
If that's the case then the turbines you see that are three quarters obscured are not tilted, but they should be if that much was lost to a so called globe.
That is just your repeatedly lie that you are yet to justify which has been refuted countless times.
Repeating the same blatant lie to try to prop up your irrational hatred of the globe will not magically make it the truth.
Stop just repeating the same pathetic refuted lie and start trying to justify it.
Either you can't see that or you just don't get it.
We don't "get" your blatant lie, because it is a blatant lie that you cannot justify and instead just continually repeat to irrationally attack the globe.
You are right that it is the same argument with lots of blatant lies you spout against the globe which you are completely incapable of justifying.
Same type of nonsense.
It really is laughable.
The same nonsense you repeatedly spout is laughable.
Again, stop just spouting garbage and start trying to justify it.
Water level.
You mean the thing being discussed indirectly due to the picture above, where level water manages to obscure the base of the turbine, even though both the observer and the turbine are above water level, showing beyond any sane doubt that this level water is curved, clearly refuting the FE nonsense you spout.
I have.
No, you haven't. All you have done is continually spout pathetic lies and repeatedly refused to justify them.
All you can do is dismiss the RE as nonsense, with no justification as to why it is nonsense.
This shows your position is not based upon evidence or rational thought.
It is just irrational of the globe.
Basically it would have to be a tilt enough to lose 6 feet of the object. It cannot be anything else if the Earth was a globe.
And that tilt required is insignificant. You not liking that fact will not change it.
The amount of tilt required to cause a drop can be estimated as 360*sqrt(h*2*R)/(2*pi*R) degrees.
With R=6371 km, and h=2 m, that tilt works out to be 0.045 degrees, i.e. basically nothing.
Again, irrefutable math shows you are spouting BS.
Can't you see how stupid it all is?
We can see how stupid your BS is. Why can't you?
Logic goes out of the window when a globe is argued for.
No, logic goes out the window when you "argue" against it.
Nothing you have said even remotely resembles logic. It is just repeatedly blatant lies, refuted trivially by simple math.
You can't even answer these simple questions, which are enough to show your claims are pure BS:
Again, If you have a tube, 1 inch in a diameter and 10 inches long, with this tube level and you looking through the tube with your eye at the midpoint of the tube's height and directly against the end of the tube, how far below the tube can an object at 1 mile distance be, in order to still be visible through the tube?
Can you see the base of a tree at 1 mile distance, if the base of the tree is 6 ft below the level of the tube?
Again, what magic prevents us from seeing the RE through a level tube?