LD prefers his beast to be slow and heavy of foot.
If you have to run, you're not powerful.
Bears are powerful and can run speed a human
However
The better analogy should be hvac hunting swings:
The reaction time between the thermostat and the furnace should be slow.
Because theres a slug of air that is still in transport.
A sustem that reacts too fast will have wild swings and never maintain stabilty.
That said, an inherent flaw will resilt in a maintained discomfort temperature that requires review and analysis - not turn off the system wih no overhaul plan.
Because then people end up dying.
You cant run a country like a business.
Because people die when you stop services.
There are no "stock buy backs" and you cant layoff whole cities.
It doesnt exist.
Govt exists to service the majority and rights exist to protect the minority.
Libertarian morons.
Omg, you SUPPORT the lumbering hulking bureaucracy that cost many Americans their freedom and massively inflated the economy.
Inflation is not a good thing. It doesn't mean you make more money, idiot. When you are paid $15 an hour but crap bread costs $4, this means for an hour of your life, you can buy a loaf of bad bread, processed cheese, some milk, and processed meat. When hotel prices inflate, $35 to stay at a hotel for a night becomes $105, and even working 8 hrs, you're struggling not to be homeless or having to decide between shelter and food.
This is the reality for people living in small towns. The people in the cities have jobs like these.
Now, I like Finnster, but he (I'm not misgendering him, he goes by male pronouns) makes sometimes hundreds or thousands a minute, while people down the block from me probably work two jobs.
So when it takes six weeks for them to process my passport, and this is with each government employee they have hired being paid to drag their feet, this is a bad thing. When there is an entire department focused on ensuring "equity" this is a bad thing (for another thing, we need EQUALITY not equity).
I draw your attention to the upper right, and lower left pictures. Equity in reality doesn't help anyone any better than just doing nothing (upper left). It would far easier and cheaper to just abolish the laws creating a barrier. For example, if you asked Supreme Court if dress codes were constitutional, and found out that poor people and minorities tend to get the shaft,
and that the right to free expression is covered under the 1st Amendment, suddenly, they can set a loose uniform, but cannot enforce penalties. This means, if the uniform was long navy slacks and a white button-up shirt for males and female have a white blouse and navy plaid skirt with white knee-highs and penny loafers, people too poor to afford the uniform can wear the Wal-Mart vert (white tee shirt and black sweatpants or jeans or whatever), crossdressers or LGBT ppl can decide the women's uniform is quite snazzy but the men's is drab. People who are too tall or fat can't be penalized if their uniform doesn't quite work. Could you still claim certain styles of dress are disruptive or dangerous? Maybe. If someone came in looking like a pimp, had a green outfit and a sword tied to their back and answered questions with "Haaaah! Yah!" or if someone showed waaaay too much skin. But you've removed the barrier, meaning you've upheld their right WITHOUT creating an inefficient department to do it. This means tax savings that go back into the public's pocket. They in turn can maybe spend on better food and clothes on their kids.
All this bureaucracy made people poor and in some towns homeless. They try to send their kids to better schools, hoping for a better life, but in fact, the all of the system screwed everyone over.
Here's a politician that I stand behind. And she happens to be one of our Senate members in my state. Danica Roem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danica_RoemA heavy metal musician, openly transgender, and she doesn't do identity politics but insists "identity shouldn't be a big deal." If I have a dungeon in my basement, or I'm bisexual and polygamous, or like to wear animal costumes... in what way do we need laws for or against this?
I was told at a Pridefest that "no such thing" for me to be trans and Republican.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_ScottLauren Scott won the Republican nomination for Nevada in June 2014. Althea Garrison won for Massachusetts House (though she was not openly trans at the time). In New Jersey, Jennifer Williams serves as councilwoman. Jordan Evans serves as Board of Trustees of the Public Library. None of these identify as Democrats. There are more Democrats than Republicans as such, but this is because Democrats have convinced them they have to be. "Stay on the plantation. We're the only ones that can take care of you," says the abuser. No thanks, I'll look after myself.
Government rules best when it ISN'T a massive beast, a Leviathan that runs people's lives. You are defending tyranny, not freedom.
Freedom requires that someone actually do some pruning of all the tangled vines of government. And if you think they are a tyrant because of that, this says more about you than them. I support Trump (Republican) and Roem (Democrat). What I don't support is statism. Mencius, an ancient Chinese philosopher was once called upon to look upon a park that a ruler built. He quickly realized it was an attractive nuisance, for meant that the forests where the homeless slept and hunted were gone, replaced by an attractive nuisance, where the poor were punished if they stayed too long.
Less laws, not more. Less taxes, not more.
Poll