1
Flat Earth General / Re: An Obvious Lie.
« on: May 06, 2017, 09:33:42 AM »
It was taken by a orbiting satellite
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Thanks for the video; I missed this launch
Events like these will continue to happen with more and more frequency and no matter how many camera angles there are, photographs taken by amateurs and/or professionals or eyewitness testimonies, it will never be good enough for the cretins who deny this is a reality.Those machines are awesome!Yeah, that thing had some serious gas. I was wondering why it farted so much during fall back.
That venting just before launch make it look like they're alive.
Serious question: do you talk about any of the bullshit you believe in with people in real life and do they do the same thing most on this site do when you post your drivel ie. laugh at you?
Secondly, how does it feel to not have any evidence for any of the nonsense you buy into? I'd imagine it must feel pretty sad or maybe being delusional moron has a fun side I can't quite grasp.
Lastly and on a related note, do you have any evidence to say that what we saw didn't actually happen? Yea, didn't think so.
Next FE retard, please!
You do have a means to brake: the engine.
Yes, yes! But you do not have the fuel to brake with the engine.
So you have been over there then?Of course. It was shit!
Lol spoken like a true coward. Why won't you? What have you got to lose. This know how popular you will be when you prove them all wrong.
To be frank - the whole Fly a Rocket Back to Earth in Broad Daylight is just a stupid, magic show.
You cannot fly a rocket back to Earth after it has departed. The Boost-back burn is impossible; you cannot position the rocket, so it flies back horizontally. And then the free fall drop slowed down by an Entry burn. Equally impossible! You have to position the rocket vertically, etc, etc. And then you drop again towards the landing zone and - at the right time - you fire a Landing burn during 30 seconds - also vertically. And 10 seconds before touch down the landing legs are put out. LOL.
And all this is fully automatic with no pilot aboard. Only plenty people watching screens at control stations in CA, FL and TX. It is hilarious. All this clowns watching screens ... doing nothing. And when asked about fuel consumed and forces applied ... they have no ideas. Sad!
Where do they find these people? In the gutters?
So you won't come and talk to any of them? Lol what a joke you are.😂
Yes, you have finally understood what I say. Congratulations!
But a link to the software used to replace the pilot aboard and a description of the hardware on the rocket with sensors, etc, so you could steer the rocket back from space and land in five minutes would be nice. After I study that info, we could discuss further.
You know seagoing ships today do not need any crew. All can be done remotely. But we take it slowly and only in the interface water/air of the ocan. No magic at all.
Lol spoken like a true coward. Why won't you? What have you got to lose. This know how popular you will be when you prove them all wrong.
To be frank - the whole Fly a Rocket Back to Earth in Broad Daylight is just a stupid, magic show.
You cannot fly a rocket back to Earth after it has departed. The Boost-back burn is impossible; you cannot position the rocket, so it flies back horizontally. And then the free fall drop slowed down by an Entry burn. Equally impossible! You have to position the rocket vertically, etc, etc. And then you drop again towards the landing zone and - at the right time - you fire a Landing burn during 30 seconds - also vertically. And 10 seconds before touch down the landing legs are put out. LOL.
And all this is fully automatic with no pilot aboard. Only plenty people watching screens at control stations in CA, FL and TX. It is hilarious. All this clowns watching screens ... doing nothing. And when asked about fuel consumed and forces applied ... they have no ideas. Sad!
Where do they find these people? In the gutters?
Not hard to figure out its a autocorect mistake and was ment to say booster. So please answer the question
Anyway - I look forward to an explanation of the last 30 seconds of the thing landing. We have seen on a drone video (owner ?? Space X ??) the thing dropping down from the sky - that four landing legs are put out in position in the last moment - and that the thing lands on ground within seconds - engine is then stopped. Smoke of something is ejected and bounces up. Success! But less than 30+ seconds earlier the thing was dropping vertially down at hypersonic speed. How could it slow down so fast?
It looks CGI to me.
inthusiasts
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Quite simple. The booster was not traveling at hypersonic speed 30 seconds before landing. Here is a visualization of the booster launch and recovery showing its altitude and speed at any given time.Not hard to figure out its a autocorect mistake and was ment to say booster. So please answer the questionWhat question?
Anyway - I look forward to an explanation of the last 30 seconds of the thing landing. We have seen on a drone video (owner ?? Space X ??) the thing dropping down from the sky - that four landing legs are put out in position in the last moment - and that the thing lands on ground within seconds - engine is then stopped. Smoke of something is ejected and bounces up. Success! But less than 30+ seconds earlier the thing was dropping vertially down at hypersonic speed. How could it slow down so fast?Please prove to me that the SpaceX rocket recovery vertical touch-down is real.The best way to prove to you that it's real is for you to go to Florida and watch a launch and recovery for yourself. If you aren't a radical Islamist terrorist, then you shouldn't have any trouble getting a tourist visa.
Thanks for the show. Of course no details of fuel consumed and forces applied during the booster stage saltomortal back on Earth = the standard No Le K$um nonsense.
I thus need more details to discuss, e.g. duration and fuel consumed of each burn, forces applied at each burn, positions/altitudes/speeds at beginning/start each burn, etc.