You know, if you're in a debate club, you should really know the difference between a question and a statement 
Okay, you got me! I made the mistake of using, "questions" when I should have used, "statements." I yield the point. It's a simple mistake, just because I made it doesn't mean I'm a weak senator.
No. Here's the deal. I'm not paid to come here, I do not have to answer your question. Neither does any other FE'er. I gave you answers, be glad I even took the time time to do that. If not, then bugger off. The day I give a random RE noob with one post a cohesive ten page paper, is the day I get a check with an angry noob signature at the bottom.
Whoa! Getting a little angry there, eh big boy? Pulling out the "new to internet" and low post count stuff, huh? Great. You've just confirmed exactly what I've said. If people don't want to (or, from what you've shown me, aren't able to) answer questions, they'll make any reason not to. Yea, that's it, keep telling yourself that. I'm beneath you because I have a lower post count. You didn't give me anything. You copied and pasted a link to an e-book that doesn't even have to do with what I asked. I seriously doubt you've even read what I originally wrote. I wasn't looking for answers. I was looking for someone to explain their theory/dogma to me, through the use of Q@A. I wasn't hostile, at all. YOU started this by dismissing what I wrote as a generic "tl;dr" and sticking to your guns that, "Earth, not Globe" was a sufficient answer.
-------------------------
Yes, you answered his last two questions, but what about his first two?
He didn't answer my point of
So, they made math under the assumption of a round earth. Do you have a point?
-------------------------
Okay? First off, you never addressed the fact that YOU didn't answer the points (nice try at a sidestep there, shift the blame) and furthermore, if you go tit for tat, you leave far more questions (lfine, you got me, STATEMENTS) unanswered. Again, while this isn't good, it isn't bad. This is a very common mistake. I was just calling attention to the fact. You said in your FAQ I believe that you encourage bringing up constructive criticism to make your website better. All I was saying was giving a more complete answer wouldn't hurt.
No, I didn't say that. You are assuming I did.
5. If NASA does use liquidation, (as some FE'er stated) it wouldn't be hard to liquidate a couple of people.
Your point?
By saying, "Your point" you are agreeing that NASA uses liquidation, and inquiring as to why he is bringing that up. At least, that's the way it came off to me. I could be incorrect, so, whatever, let's say, for arguments sake, that there was some combination of you inferring, and me implying (more of me implying than you inferring). The onus of clarity is still on you. Your initial statement could be taken either way; that's a knock on you, not me.
You take a really long time to say nothing.
Oh boy. Topping it off with an ad hominem attack. Thanks mate, I really appreciate it. Our conversation could have easily been you and I having a civil discussion about your controversial, but very interesting,theories, which most people would enjoy discussing. I'm giving you an open venue to tell me things, whereas most people just completely shut the theory off, and assume anyone who believes it is innately a little daft.
I'm not challenging you here. I actually want to hear what someone who believes in a flat earth has to say about what I inquired. I know you're probably used to people angrily storming onto your forums, but I actually want to hear what some of you people have to say about this.
No sarcasm, no hostility. In fact, I'm quite impressed with your prose/tone. If you ever change your mind about me, I'd still be happy to discuss your theories with you. You seem like an intelligent man, and I'd like to see what you have to say.