Humanity Star

Awesome.

Because here's three videos taken through telescopes.

This one is of an alleged satellite:



It looks very much like the videos of NEOs to me.

Here are two:






Yep - can't tell any difference at all.

Can anyone else?

If so explain what the difference is please.

Why is this request so hard for you?

One difference is the orbital period. 

The humanity star orbits every 92 minutes.

How often do those NEOs orbit the earth?

Irrelevant.

My question is: do these three videos appear to show the same phenomenon?

This one is of an alleged satellite:



It looks very much like the videos of NEOs to me.

Here are two:






Yep - can't tell any difference at all.

Can anyone else?

If so explain what the difference is please.

Why is this request so hard for you?

Irrelevant.

My question is: do these three videos appear to show the same phenomenon?

Yes.  At a casual glance they all appear to show light being reflected off an object high above the Earth.

Yep - can't tell any difference at all.

Can anyone else?

If so explain what the difference is please.

Why is this request so hard for you?

I also can't tell the difference between the objects.  They appear to be too far away to resolve any more clearly than a spot of light, for my eyesight anyway. 

What's the point?  Can you identify the make and model of a car driving at night on a hillside 5 miles away?  One of those objects was listed, at it's closest, at just under 6 Earth radii in distance.  If you can't identify more than the presence or absence of a car at 5 miles, why do you think we should be able to identify fine details on an object 24,000 miles away?  Even the closer satellites are several hundred miles away.  So what exactly is the point of your question?

Irrelevant.

My question is: do these three videos appear to show the same phenomenon?

This one is of an alleged satellite:



It looks very much like the videos of NEOs to me.

Here are two:






Yep - can't tell any difference at all.

Can anyone else?

If so explain what the difference is please.

Why is this request so hard for you?

There are significant differences visible in the videos, including telescope field of view, camera exposure, object brightness.

The significant difference for the purposes of NEO versus satellite is that the object in Video 1 increases in brightness over the frame, explicitly stated by the video poster as satellite coming out of shadow. The objects in Videos 2 and 3 do not.

Whether or not one "can't tell any difference at all" depends on how much attention and care one takes in one's observation.

Another indication of attention and care is the selection of three videos to make a point when the data space is much larger. But care and attention to detail ... not really a thing here.

I also can't tell the difference from between them.

Exactly.

And the object in video one does not increase in brightness over the frame.

It gets brighter then darker due to the nature of the camera.

Nothing to do with shadows.

Lying will do you no good.

But as the fake mods have warned me to stop posting in this thread I guess the bots win another fake victory.

https://spacecentre.co.uk - home of the world famous flat Earth society!

Quote from: ItsRoundIPromise on January 31, 2018, 09:00:07 AM

I also can't tell the difference from between them.

And the object in video one does not increase in brightness over the frame.

It gets brighter then darker due to the nature of the camera.

Nothing to do with shadows.

You asked if anyone can tell a difference and to explain what the difference is. I've done so.

Flimsy wibbly wobbly "nature of the camera" argument? Grasping at straws.

Sorry to see you leave.

Quote from: ItsRoundIPromise on January 31, 2018, 09:00:07 AM

I also can't tell the difference from between them.

Exactly.

Except you neglected to answer the follow up question.  What is the point?  I can't tell the difference between objects that are hundreds or thousands of miles away.  Do you think that is evidence of anything?

Why can you not answer me?

We have answered you.
You ignored it because it showed you to be full of shit.
The satellite in question is in a ~ 90 minute polar orbit with a known ground track. There is no known NEO that has that characteristic. In fact, the current classification of NEOs do not include objects directly orbitting Earth quite closely.
It is also meant to have a bright flash every so often which is visible with the naked eye.


Stop acting like your videos are the only possible way to tell, which requires you to outright ignore massive amounts of data on these objects.

Now why can't you rationally address these objections to your BS?

Some more videos.

Papa Botba can’t do anything but repeat himself. He doesn’t even realize that by admitting that there are NEOs, he’s conceded that there is a solar system with a variety of interesting objects orbiting the Sun. That’s all we’re saying!