1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Polaris Constellation Never Be Seen 90° Height
« on: May 16, 2024, 06:14:57 AM »
Tidak ada bukti foto
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Danang, I would have voted, but your poll is wrong. π ≈ 3.1415 , not = 3.1415
More so, when I found out later about an experiment of peer pressure where plants all gave the wrong answer to a which line is bigger question.And have you bothered reading that?
https://www.simplypsychology.org/asch-conformity.html
Firstly, it was only 32% of the time that it actually worked.
Later experiments showed that going beyond 5 people has no significant effect, but having a single dissenter does dramatically reduce conformity.If we are to trust our actual visionOur vision is quite often mislead with lots of optical illusions based upon that.
And this has nothing at all to do with if the line terminates or not.
That is just a bad drawing.
This is just Danang spouting insane crap to claim pi is wrong.
Despite the terminus line, the red cone is still bigger in terms of volume.
Today, I finally get my revenge.
.
Next Round Based Cone.
Compared to a circle line, radian equals straight line.
So the two diameters of round 1.58579 each to be changed to become two diagonals on Flat Surface. Side equals Diagonal times 0.5√2. Then area = (0.5√2 x 1.58579)^2 = 1.25736. And dont forget to round the height of 1 by 0.79289. Thrn you got 0.79289 × 1 × 1.25736 = 0.99695.
Both cones have the same 0.99695.
I spent a solid 20 minutes creating an Excel spreadsheet with depictions, detailing the question, the context of the question, a breakdown of the visual provided as an aid to answer the question, and the assumptions I made due to not being given any units whatsoever.
Then I read Danang's post that I am not to use the formulae I learned in elementary / middle school regarding geometry. This rules out... pretty much everything.
Danang, what system of mathematics are you using to arrive at your conclusions? Why am I not allowed to use standard 'mainstream' mathematics?
Both cones (with and without dome) have the same volume.By this do you mean the blue cone, including the spherical cap, has the same volume as the red cone?
If so, that would happen at some angle.School's formulas cannot be applied.Yes it can, as you are yet to show fault with it, and spouting baseless BS wont change that.Explanation with calculation pleaseWhy? Why don't you cut the crap and get to the point?
The flat one, or the round?
are you talking about just "cone" or "spherical cone" because if we're talking about just cone, then JB jas covered it. but for spherical cone, if the distance between two blue dots is taken as 'h' then the volume of the red cone is equal to the volume of blue spherical cone when h = r/2 . if h < r/2 then blue volume is greater and vice versa. if your drawing is to scale, then the blue volume is indeed smaller.
but first, answer this : why is sin(3.1715/4) ≈ 0.7123 when sin(45°) = 1/√2 ≈ 0.707 ?