You are always comparing NASA’s exploits with Hollywood productions. Over the last few years just think about all the really cool sci-fi stuff Hollywood has produced. ......and NASA.....photographs of Pluto and more recently a fuzzy rock! Why did they fake a dam fuzzy rock when they could have at least made it sharp and slightly interesting?
Because they have to be very carefull nowadays.
The Baron report, the death of Gus Grissom, the outrage of Gus' family till this very date, the research after the supposedly ''tragic accident'', the Nixon presidency, the abrupt ending of moon missions.......
Of course many politicians had serious doubts off the record, the whole Apollo episode is a mixed bag of outragious claims, suspicious deaths (long list) that it makes far more sense why the congress didn't want to continue this ...instead of what you learned about ''a lost of interrest'' and ''stupid congressmen that don't understand the benefits of space travel''.
Even recently NASA was questioned about their ''next step in space'' and it was extremely telling how the NASA spokesman responded in congress.
The congressman was punching holes in his defence ,but he simply couldn't tell what NASA's next step in space was.
If there was a moment of ''congress does not give a carte blanche to NASA for some wild guesses about what they are going to do with this money'' this was it.
I can present you the vids if you need them to convince yourself that congress is very critical about NASA's loose interpretetions of reality.
Bottom line, the playing field of NASA has been crippled severely, because many are aware that things NASA claims don't always allign with reality.
That aside why no good fakes, and why no more moon landing fakes? What’s stopping them? What’s stopping you explaining? You are the fake NASA expert, or so you claim!
All the stuff they fake, fake according to you that is, is pretty boring so much so that the public shows little interest.
Why is NASA so rubbish at fakery given the huge amount of money it has, according to Flat Earthers?
You underestimate how many people off the record dismiss many of NASA claims.
Recently even Joe Rogan (a former moon hoax believer who made the biggest U-turn in history) told he seriously doubted the Apollo footage and other claims.
Remember that Neil deGrasse Tyson was present in several of Joe's podcasts and so was Elon Musk in an hours lasting episode.
To me it seems we are indeed prepaired for the inevetable.......NASA did fake the moonlandings.
Joe Rogan was a moon hoax'er but made a U-turn and defended the moonlandings 100% for years with a vengeance.
Many scientific outlets consider him worthy of a in dept interviews rarely found elsewhere...very enlightening indeed !!
And now Joe has changed positions once more, but very different this time.
He, althaugh he and Neil deGrasse Tyson get along in a way i have not seen elsewhere on the www, openly ridicule's some of the Apollo footage as an outrage and clear fakery !
Time for NdGT to step in and tell his friend to stop being a total moron ?
No.....NASA's Apollo claims are truly numbered wether you like it or not.
So to answer your question,....because NASA has claimed every single photograph was taken on the moon, not a single picture was manipulated, no wires or other fakery was ever involved makes them vulnerable.
They cannot change their position now.....everything was 100% genuine moon stuff...,so they still claim.
They simply keep quiet and do those things that will not create a fuzz of any sorts.
The fact that the Orion crew still not has managed the hazards of the VAB's after years of modern research with far superiour computer simulations (more delicate equipment compared to 1969 ?
) is a sign on the wall.
Mark my words the Apollo moonlanding is NASA's millstone and therefore they cannot overdue their current claims, because several congressmen and millions of civilians understand we cannot really trust NASA and the money handed over to them.
So CGI and a few pixels of pluto is their current playing field.