Hi there! Thanks for asking in such a respectful way. We, as Flat Earth believers, question the mainstream model based on a few key points:
Personal Observation: Everyday experience shows no curvature. Landscapes, lakes, and even long-distance photography often appear flat without the expected curve.
Lack of Verifiable Proof: We don’t believe NASA or other agencies have provided independently verifiable, non-CGI evidence of a spherical Earth (e.g., unedited photos/videos).
Historical Context: Ancient cultures (like the Babylonians or Egyptians) believed in a flat Earth, and we question why this perspective was universally dismissed post Copernicus.
Scientific Inconsistencies: Certain phenomena (like horizon lines always rising to eye level or the behavior of water seeking "level") are incompatible with a spinning ball.
For us, it’s about demanding empirical proof rather than accepting narratives blindly.
[Personal Note:] Beyond evidence, I stand against the globe model because it fuels a corrupt industry. Over $20 billion of taxpayer money is annually diverted to unaccountable projects, enriching contractors while our world suffers. A peaceful, just future requires rejecting this lie. Follow the money: NASA's annual budget could provide 7 billion meals for the hungry. Ask yourself: why are we buying fake space images instead of real food for real people? We are the people not buying it.