questions your Q&A inspired...

  • 61 Replies
  • 12932 Views
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #30 on: November 09, 2007, 11:15:16 AM »
did you not mean, melted. I think before the sun came into being, the entire earth would have been covered in ice, and then as the sun grew hotter, the ice under the sun melted, for the most part. Leaving the Ice wall.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #31 on: November 09, 2007, 02:22:52 PM »
did you not mean, melted. I think before the sun came into being, the entire earth would have been covered in ice, and then as the sun grew hotter, the ice under the sun melted, for the most part. Leaving the Ice wall.

That doesn't explain how the ice wall is 150,000 feet tall; unless, (as I previously asked) Earth began to sink inwards as the ice melted. This would explain the height of the wall but would pose a new question: what stopped Earth from sinking as the ice continued to melt? -OR- How can Earth sink if it is being shot upwards?
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #32 on: November 09, 2007, 02:34:57 PM »
It is not 150000 feet tall.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #33 on: November 09, 2007, 05:44:34 PM »
unless, (as I previously asked) Earth began to sink inwards as the ice melted.

What? The planet doesn't sink.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #34 on: November 09, 2007, 06:50:33 PM »
did you not mean, melted. I think before the sun came into being, the entire earth would have been covered in ice, and then as the sun grew hotter, the ice under the sun melted, for the most part. Leaving the Ice wall.

That doesn't explain how the ice wall is 150,000 feet tall; unless, (as I previously asked) Earth began to sink inwards as the ice melted. This would explain the height of the wall but would pose a new question: what stopped Earth from sinking as the ice continued to melt? -OR- How can Earth sink if it is being shot upwards?

wtf. how about you accelerate a block of cement from your floor to your ceiling, then see if it sinks. I never said it would sink, just that the ice would melt, uncovering the land. Have you ever heard of equilibrium? Check where the ice melts in a puddle...
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

AllHaveFallen

  • 31
  • +0/-0
  • The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #35 on: November 10, 2007, 09:20:02 AM »
Then, once the surface reaches a suitable temperature for life, bacteria begin to appear. The first anaerobic bacteria do not require oxygen to survive. Due to the evolution process, photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria) and plants also appear. Their photosynthesis generates oxygen from light (the Sun), water (the hydrologic cycle), and CO2 (from the melted ice).
How do bacteria "appear"? As far as I know, unless something creates it, creatures don't just spring up out of the ground. I mean, when we see a watch lying on the ground, we don't say, "Oh! Look how this just sprang out of the ground! And the squirrel hair and the bark and grass have made this watch!"
"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #36 on: November 10, 2007, 09:21:10 AM »
How do bacteria "appear"? As far as I know, unless something creates it, creatures don't just spring up out of the ground. I mean, when we see a watch lying on the ground, we don't say, "Oh! Look how this just sprang out of the ground! And the squirrel hair and the bark and grass have made this watch!"

...just...wow. High school science should help you out there.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

AllHaveFallen

  • 31
  • +0/-0
  • The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #37 on: November 10, 2007, 09:27:38 AM »
Please, tell me. I want to know how creatures can spring out of the ground. As far as I know, scientists have not been able to throw some chemicals into an area and leave it alone for a couple of years and come back and find an organism.
"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #38 on: November 10, 2007, 09:39:10 AM »
Please, tell me. I want to know how creatures can spring out of the ground. As far as I know, scientists have not been able to throw some chemicals into an area and leave it alone for a couple of years and come back and find an organism.

Who said creatures spring out of the ground? Again, high school science is quite useful.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

AllHaveFallen

  • 31
  • +0/-0
  • The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #39 on: November 10, 2007, 09:46:45 AM »
Then, once the surface reaches a suitable temperature for life, bacteria begin to appear. The first anaerobic bacteria do not require oxygen to survive. Due to the evolution process, photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria) and plants also appear. Their photosynthesis generates oxygen from light (the Sun), water (the hydrologic cycle), and CO2 (from the melted ice).
How do bacteria "appear"? As far as I know, unless something creates it, creatures don't just spring up out of the ground. I mean, when we see a watch lying on the ground, we don't say, "Oh! Look how this just sprang out of the ground! And the squirrel hair and the bark and grass have made this watch!"
I ask again, how do bacteria appear? Many people have done experiments in which they simulated what they thought it would be like at the beginning of the world. They used electricity (representing lightning) to start the reaction between the ingredients, and they came up with amino acids. Stanley Miller, the first to do this kind of experiment, actually tried this experiment twice, but with no amino acids. So, he jiggled the apparatus some, and then got the amino acids. Instead of trying to get amino acids to be created, scientists also tried to make RNA. However, it would be a miracle if RNA was produced. If a miracle did occur and RNA was produced, then a second miracle would have to be needed to get just the right chemically intact RNA.
"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 18074
  • +15/-12
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #40 on: November 10, 2007, 09:48:35 AM »
Then, once the surface reaches a suitable temperature for life, bacteria begin to appear. The first anaerobic bacteria do not require oxygen to survive. Due to the evolution process, photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria) and plants also appear. Their photosynthesis generates oxygen from light (the Sun), water (the hydrologic cycle), and CO2 (from the melted ice).
How do bacteria "appear"? As far as I know, unless something creates it, creatures don't just spring up out of the ground. I mean, when we see a watch lying on the ground, we don't say, "Oh! Look how this just sprang out of the ground! And the squirrel hair and the bark and grass have made this watch!"
I ask again, how do bacteria appear? Many people have done experiments in which they simulated what they thought it would be like at the beginning of the world. They used electricity (representing lightning) to start the reaction between the ingredients, and they came up with amino acids. Stanley Miller, the first to do this kind of experiment, actually tried this experiment twice, but with no amino acids. So, he jiggled the apparatus some, and then got the amino acids. Instead of trying to get amino acids to be created, scientists also tried to make RNA. However, it would be a miracle if RNA was produced. If a miracle did occur and RNA was produced, then a second miracle would have to be needed to get just the right chemically intact RNA.

So, in your opinion, how did life come about?
"Once again the apostles of science are found to lack the scientific credentials for their faith. This not an indictment of science; it only shows again that the choice of science over other forms of life is not a scientific choice."

?

AllHaveFallen

  • 31
  • +0/-0
  • The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #41 on: November 10, 2007, 09:55:42 AM »
God created it. It's pretty obvious with all the complexity of life around you.
"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #42 on: November 10, 2007, 10:07:53 AM »
This is not the place for this type of discussion.  Take it elsewhere.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

AllHaveFallen

  • 31
  • +0/-0
  • The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #43 on: November 10, 2007, 10:11:50 AM »
Sorry, my bad. Get on with your discussion, I just wanted to point that out.
"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #44 on: November 10, 2007, 03:05:57 PM »
did you not mean, melted. I think before the sun came into being, the entire earth would have been covered in ice, and then as the sun grew hotter, the ice under the sun melted, for the most part. Leaving the Ice wall.

That doesn't explain how the ice wall is 150,000 feet tall; unless, (as I previously asked) Earth began to sink inwards as the ice melted. This would explain the height of the wall but would pose a new question: what stopped Earth from sinking as the ice continued to melt? -OR- How can Earth sink if it is being shot upwards?

wtf. how about you accelerate a block of cement from your floor to your ceiling, then see if it sinks. I never said it would sink, just that the ice would melt, uncovering the land. Have you ever heard of equilibrium? Check where the ice melts in a puddle...

I'm simply asking HOW the ice wall got to be as tall as FEers claim that it is. (From what I've read on this site, many believe it to be 150,000 feet tall. If this is inaccurate, by all means, give me an accurate number with which to ask future questions.) :)

Resorting to vulgar language is not a proper way to converse. If you are having trouble with something I'm saying, just ask me to clarify, and I will. There's no need to act like a spoiled toddler with a full diaper. :)
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #45 on: November 11, 2007, 05:11:09 PM »
According to the FAQ (*the last time I read it*) the Ice Wall is 150ft tall.

Some people have speculated that it is higher and must be to keep the atmolayer in, but I'm a firm believer in TheEngineers DEF theory.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #46 on: November 11, 2007, 05:35:44 PM »
 :D


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #47 on: November 11, 2007, 08:13:52 PM »
Ok, whether the ice wall is 150 or 150,000 feet tall, the earth must have sunk inwards if it was originally covered in ice. Unless of course you are saying that the 150 foot ice wall has always been 150 feet taller than the rest of the earth... which nobody has said, thus far.

Also, since water expands when frozen and contracts when thawed, the effect of the water "shrinking" and revealing land would look a little like the earth sinking inwards as the ice wall raised upwards. :)

So, which is it: the earth sunk inwards as the ice melted OR the ice wall has always been taller than the rest of the earth?
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #48 on: November 11, 2007, 08:29:32 PM »
I've put forward that the ice wall mountain range is a direct consequence of the subduction of outgoing tectonic plates at the outer ring.  Thus forming them, as well as maintaining them.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #49 on: November 11, 2007, 09:28:28 PM »
Ok, whether the ice wall is 150 or 150,000 feet tall, the earth must have sunk inwards if it was originally covered in ice. Unless of course you are saying that the 150 foot ice wall has always been 150 feet taller than the rest of the earth... which nobody has said, thus far.
The Earth does not sink inward. How many times do I have to say it?

Also, since water expands when frozen and contracts when thawed, the effect of the water "shrinking" and revealing land would look a little like the earth sinking inwards as the ice wall raised upwards. :)
The water does not "shrink" as land is revealed. The water fills the gap of the rocky continents underneath the icy layer. When ice melts, the water is added to the overall volume of the ocean. The ice wall does not rise upward.

Refer to my previous post about the Ice Wall theory.

So, which is it: the earth sunk inwards as the ice melted OR the ice wall has always been taller than the rest of the earth?
I would choose C: none of the above.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2007, 10:46:51 PM by Jack- »

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #50 on: November 12, 2007, 01:10:19 PM »
I've put forward that the ice wall mountain range is a direct consequence of the subduction of outgoing tectonic plates at the outer ring.  Thus forming them, as well as maintaining them.

Fair enough. At least that would explain the water/ice "problem" I've been having. (Unlike some other posts...) :)

So, if the ice wall is only 150 feet tall, how exactly does it keep the "atmoplane" or "atmolayer" in place? Why doesn't the atmo---whatever, leak out like smoke from a cauldron?
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #51 on: November 12, 2007, 04:15:41 PM »
Fair enough. At least that would explain the water/ice "problem" I've been having. (Unlike some other posts...) :)
Took you long enough to understand it.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2007, 05:49:17 PM by Jack- »

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #52 on: November 12, 2007, 05:16:13 PM »
So, if the ice wall is only 150 feet tall, how exactly does it keep the "atmoplane" or "atmolayer" in place? Why doesn't the atmo---whatever, leak out like smoke from a cauldron?
The DEF provides atmospheric containment.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #53 on: November 12, 2007, 07:26:05 PM »
Fair enough. At least that would explain the water/ice "problem" I've been having. (Unlike some other posts...) :)
Took you long enough to understand it.

You didn't explain it at all like he did, and he didn't explain it until that last post so... yeah.

And, for the record, water expands when it freezes and ice contracts when it melts. You NEVER explained how that created a 150 foot tall ice wall. Don't take credit for somebody else's work, it just makes you look lazy. :)
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #54 on: November 12, 2007, 07:42:03 PM »
You didn't explain it at all like he did, and he didn't explain it until that last post so... yeah.
Eh,

In the end, the ice stops melting because the edge is farther away from heat source, leaving an "ice wall" (rocky layers are underneath the ice). Thus, the melting process ceases. Lithospheric activity controls its mountain ranges.

And, for the record, water expands when it freezes and ice contracts when it melts. You NEVER explained how that created a 150 foot tall ice wall.
Sure I did, you just don't seem to grasp, that's all.  It's ok if you don't understand anything. The icy layer is above the rocky layer, so when it melts, it contracts. However, as it contracts, water volume increases because ice is melting, thus filling the opening gaps of the rocky layer and the spaces left by the contraction of ice. The ice stops melting at the edge, leaving a thick layer of ice covering the underneath layer of rocks. Hence, the ice wall. Lithospheric activity forms mountains underneath the ice. It doesn't have to be exactly 150 feet tall; it's an average value. In a puddle of ice, if the ice melts, what happens? The ice contracts, leaving spaces for water. There the water fills up the space. In the end, it becomes a puddle of water rather than ice. That's equilibrium. However, as Agent Z pointed out, you don't understand equilibrium. Therefore...  :-X

When the ice above Greenland melts, does Greenland sink inward? Nope.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2007, 12:48:35 AM by Jack- »

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #55 on: November 12, 2007, 08:39:04 PM »
Ok, then the water sinks inwards. My point is still there, irregardless of how malformed my previous posts were.

Also, it's kind of ironic for an FEer to imply that somebody else doesn't understand anything. :)
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #56 on: November 12, 2007, 09:18:34 PM »
Ok, then the water sinks inwards.
Water doesn't sink inwards.

Also, it's kind of ironic for an FEer to imply that somebody else doesn't understand anything. :)
Looks like you never read my posts.

?

Jikan

  • 58
  • +0/-0
  • Supernova pic... taken from space.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #57 on: November 12, 2007, 09:32:46 PM »
You caught me, I never read any of your posts. So, you're saying that you are NOT an FEer? Then why do you subscribe to this whole ice wall theory?

Also, how can the earth have started out covered in ice and, as the ice melted into water, land was revealed where the ice once was? If the water didn't sink, where did it go? How can land exist above water if it was beneath ice just before the ice melted?

Clearly, I'm having a hard time understanding your posts as they seem to contradict the ideas that FET put forth.
"Bring down the curtain, the farce is played out." --Francois Rabelais--

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #58 on: November 12, 2007, 09:50:14 PM »
You caught me, I never read any of your posts. So, you're saying that you are NOT an FEer? Then why do you subscribe to this whole ice wall theory?

It's a lot of fun, really.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: questions your Q&A inspired...
« Reply #59 on: November 12, 2007, 09:58:09 PM »
You caught me, I never read any of your posts. So, you're saying that you are NOT an FEer? Then why do you subscribe to this whole ice wall theory?
Nope, I'm not an FE'er.

Also, how can the earth have started out covered in ice and, as the ice melted into water, land was revealed where the ice once was?
We never know why the Earth was covered with ice. You might as well ask, "why is there have to be a Big Bang in the beginning of the universe?". Trust me, you will never get a full, well-explained answer. It is just how theories use theoretical explanations to make concepts more sensible, like how the Big Bang is consistent with General Relativity and explains why the universe continues to expand. Yet, there are doubts of its existence. Hence, it is a theory.

If global warming melts all the ice of Greenland, the rocky layer that was under the icy surface will be revealed, right? Now, where does the water go? Into the open spaces such as oceans or gaps (forming lakes and rivers). This is same as the flat Earth model.

If the water didn't sink, where did it go? How can land exist above water if it was beneath ice just before the ice melted?
You said water sinks inwards. Therefore, I corrected you. Water doesn't sink inwards; the water left by the ice fills up the spaces left by the contraction of ice and gaps of the rocky layer.

When the icy layer melts, the water fills the opening gaps and spaces. Hence, land is revealed. This is like the RE model: why are there oceans? Because there are large gaps for them to fill. The rocky layer of the flat Earth has large gaps. Remember, the melting starts at the center. Heat from the sun converts some of the ice into water vapor directly. Some liquid water are also converted into water vapor. The hydrologic cycle dominates this.

Here is the side-view of the process (with the hydrologic cycle):

1. The icy flat Earth.


2. The ice at the center melts into liquid water. The water spreads by a force known as the Hydrolical Force (Fwater).


3. Ice continues to melt and water continues to spread. At the same time, sublimation occurs.


4. Ice continues to melt and water continues to spread further. Sublimation continues.


5. Ice melts and water spreads. Evaporation makes progress.


6. The melting process stops near the edge. Condensation occurs.


And the cycle continues...

Now, do you understand?

Clearly, I'm having a hard time understanding your posts as they seem to contradict the ideas that FET put forth.
It's just my theory of how the flat Earth forms.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2007, 06:10:40 PM by Jack- »