When did he assert that FEers are solely driven by religious dogma? Who isn't reading posts?
You, apparently.
Their Ideology is likely purely religious based and faith based.
Care to try again? Maybe you should read what you post?
The likely is what made me post that. His lack of any concrete knowledge is sad.
If you define those terms, they are not stating that it's 100% applicable to everyone.
Please define "likely". When you say lack of concrete knowledge, FE is a prime example of that. The fact that you can't even cough up anything other than cartoon maps, or the fact you can't even cough up a circumference to your FE theory without backpedaling shows exactly how lacking of concrete knowledge FE theists are. And I say theists because this topic of FE is faith based assumption with nothing to give it any sort of validity. Concrete knowledge shows that the FE theory can't even pass a simple time, speed, and distance calculation. And I don't even have to go into the flawed and obvious mathematical problems within how the FE society calculated the distance to the moon. Manipulating information into pseudoscience around an ideological construct does not make the FE theory magically credible, factual, or have any sort of "concrete knowledge".. Thus this is why it's largely showing itself to be religious in nature.
When FE can actually make a map to the sq meter and have it be pinpoint accurate for navigation to which won't get people lost and killed, you let me know. Until you can do that, you have no means to be stating that I lack concrete knowledge.
Spherical calculations to achieve accurate navigation can not magically be undone to support a Flat Earth, or used to navigate a Flat Earth .. It's simple math, and that's really all I needed to establish that the Earth is spherical in shape. Circles and spheres are not mathematically compatible what-so-ever in this regard, and you ought to know that.
When it comes to religious dogma, this doesn't mean it deals with any particular religion, but rather that it behaves like a religious dogma. Thus, I can simply read and note how FE people talk and argue to establish that it's dogmatic. In fact it seems to rely on it vs actually providing real data to support it's position. For instance, telling people to lurk more into the Faq and then backpedaling on the FAQ when someone like me takes it and peer reviews it's obvious flaws. Thus you need to actually establish something before you start making up wild fantasies as magical truth's.
And this is why you can't magically turn a Sphere into a circle and have it ever mathematically add up.I will state this though, the FE ideal comes from not just the Bible, but also from the observations of averaging heights over land mass surface, or from other religions. The FE society seems to be it's own religious construct to which incorporates all those who believe it's flat. The problem with this isn't that it's a society of Flat Earther's, or even religious in nature. It's problem is that it has nothing to support it, it's inconsistent, relies on dogma, relies on conspiracy, it's assertive, it's assuming, and even tries to play the magical object games to give it credibility through what is one massive circular argument.. It will never be consistent, add up, or ever provide any sort of data that will substantiate and validate it with any sort of merit.
It's pretty sad when I can come here and use the spaghetti monster, and invisible dragon argument.
Here, you can even track the shape of the moons orbit according to spherical Earth.. Have fun doing this and having it come out mathematically correct according to FE:
http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/barnes/ASTR110L_F03/moonorbit.htmlhttp://www.zetatalk.com/index/orbits.htmhttp://library.thinkquest.org/29033/begin/earthsunmoon.htm