and no, bulmba brought it up.
while it's not an epidemic of scnearios, a favourite to use was hair to get black girls booted from sports teams.
now some official gets to check their genitals.
the girl who was raped at school was before the radical (in this case yes, real crazy leftards) left nonsense kicked in.
throughly debunked.
and same with kitty litter for identiying as a cat.
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/family-of-loudoun-co-student-sexually-assaulted-ineptitude-of-all-involved-is-staggering/3231725/and if protecting women was a goal, then guns!
guns are always the answer:
harden those washrooms.
don't ban transwashrooms, because criminals willalways find a way.
no penis zones do nothing. girls should be strapped so they can fuck back. nothing stops a raper like a good raper with a BBDong.
oh and let's stop the rapers.
trump got a pass.
brock turner
tate
etcetcetc.
mmm it's almost as if the outrage is specifc...oddly specific.
and then lets take the extremes.
1. cut off all the tits!
vs
2. you don't exist, go have fun.
1 can be legislated easily as already previously mentioned.
2 perpetuates suicide and limits individual freedom to do their own weirdo things.
so back to guns and flipityflip it:
people are getting [shot/ raped] at school, let's ban all the [guns/ trans].
the school is going to [create a safe space for your kid to talk to a teacher/ may or may not be armed] without the parents knowledge.
we should ban [talks/ bring back training] of [sex/ guns] so our kids can understand [guns/sex] and not shoot their friend in the ass [no double needed hahaaa].
so who's putting the most legislative power behind the least <1% problem?
libtards banning guns when mass shootings are 1% of the killings.
magahats banning washrooms when there's not a single trans-caused toilet rape?
yes both.
but also, seriously?
bothsidiessies are not equal.
we can judge them by their own merit of double standard.
show me the leftard's double standard.
all you got is they go crazy with the cuttings.
and i agree.
the cuttings are crazy.
we are not indisagreement.
but my only point is - making policy that only serves the 1% doesn't make policy.
if the "left" does it, it's because they are doing identiy politics and they are don't actually want to pass lasting policy that would benefit the middle-lower class as a whole.
it's a distraction.
and if the right does it, it's because htey're cruel and want people to die and also creates infighting at the bottom and it's a distraction.
not quite bothsidieieses.
that's my point.