Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lorddave

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 523
1
Yes, businesses want profit.

You're the asshole who doesn't want to give it to them.
Or did you forget that even Mao eventually conceded "greed is good," and allowed a capitalist-like economic system even though the government is ostensibly communist. We went to China in 2005. We noticed the US was more economically socialist than China, which had little to no regulations against street corner businesses. US? To sell something, you often need to get a permit.
https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/329291
Yeah... they banned them.  Because they were so unregulated they were disgusting.  Now they're back (as of 2023) and regulated.
I'm guessing you're just making shit up because given how POOR you are what with having failed your family diner, I'm pretty sure you couldn't fly from Virgina to China, let alone vacation there.

Quote
But yes, you say it "didn't work." So I guess you're right.
Please see the definition of "Monopoly".
Or how about For Profit Prisons.  That's a good one and its recent.

Quote
Or maybe I remember things fondly growing up in the 80s and 90s, and my fond memories are correct. And maybe, just maybe, when businesses want profit, you ought to give it to them.
Ok.  So lets let Walmart own your street.  The street in front of your house.  To leave your driveway, you need a monthly subscription, which they will set at $500.
Since you NEED your car to get to work, you have no choice in paying, don't you?  And since Walmart owns the street and you have no choice in where shop for your driving needs, you MUST pay them.  Unless you wanna walk on the sidewalk that they also own.  That's only $100/month.
See: Internet providers for real world examples.

Quote
We've driven through New Jersey several times. We've seen some very sketchy businesses. There are also nice country roads where you can buy bread in Cape May. Or small food stands that sell corn or other produce. You don't seem to understand New Jersey.
At no point did I mention the quality of businesses in New Jersey.  I was referring to the NJ transit Authority, which handles roads like the Turnpike, and how the tolls are ... not enough to cover the total cost of the turnpike.  Its even worse in places where it snows alot.  But sure, keep thinking you're right when history has proven you wrong.

Quote
We went to a restaurant recently for Mother's Day. My dad (upper-middle class, not super wealthy but able to do nice things) went about a $30/person restaurant. With taxes and tip, he raised the total to about $50/person, he said. That's a little more than 30% combined tax and tip, no?
As for me, I usually avoid restaurants, as I know that I can't pay a fair tip.
And?  Isn't your dad a pastor at a big church, making close to or over $100,000/year?


Quote
You don't understand choice, because you think people have to be forced to do things. If you offer people something they already want, yes they will pay for it. The reason rich people might not like spending a 30% sales tax is that you foisted it on them. Compare these two sales taxes, and see if you get it.

Version 1: Luxury car tax at 30%. No say in how it is spent. Rich hate this tax (but let's face it, they hate all taxes) and might instead buy non-luxury cars.
Version 2: Many more cars are considered luxury. The ones that aren't are like used Pintos or 10+ year old cars. Those cars are tax free. Buying any decent new car has a 10% tax. But can pay a custom tax of 11% or more. Someone is super in favor of funding Ukraine's war. They buy the same car, but this time volunteer to pay 30%, provided they can write in 'Ukraine'.
Version 1: They literally buy luxury cars depsite the luxury tax.  The only reaon to buy it is status symbol and thus: they do.  So already you're wrong.
Version 2: If a rich person is in favor of funding Ukraine's war, they'll tell their representative to do that. 



Quote
You'd think that this is impossible. You'd be wrong. We can see you're wrong by looking at tip behavior. You can tip as little as nothing, yet the standard tip is usually 15%. Some pay alot more. After restaurants moved to a gratuity plus tip, some people just leave it at the gratuity and don't pay more. Interesting, isn't it? When people are told what is a social expectation, they tend to pay it and pay more in some cases. When people are made to pay a certain amount, they don't volunteer any more. Almost like people want to pay for things they want to pay for, and don't like being ordered to do so.
You can see it's wrong again when you find out about charity contributions.

Taxes are supposed to be a tip for government doing a good job. If people are trying to pay nothing, this ought to tell volumes about how little they like the service. Or how poor they are. And if you think people have to be forced to pay taxes, deep down, you also know that the services the government provides are horse shit.

Churches do this model (offering is any value, not mandatory). They usually manage to stay in business, provide there are enough members. When there is a specific crisis (e.g. flood in New Orleans), they are told to write on the Pay to the Order of part of the check the church name, and the For part New Orleans Relief. If a church can do this, despite not having government resources and technology, why can't we make touchscreens that tell the government what we want our taxes spent on? You're making excuses.
Yeah... you don't seem to understand people.  Tipping and Churches are social pressure.  At least in America.  When in Church, its expected that you give them money because you've always done it.  Your parents did it.  Your grand parents did it.  Etc... Its pretty much how Churches work and that's why a plate goes around: You can see what others have put in and you feel obligated to put some in yourself.  Its  a way of guilting (even if they don't FEEL guilty) money. 

As for your story: Well ... yes and no.  It depends on the state.  The average is 15-20% of expected Tipping.  Gratuity payments are not tips and thus aren't counted as such for the purpose of your bill.  But they range from 15 - 20%.  More for larger parties.  Which the customer than see's as a tip for the waitstaff (it isn't) and thus doesn't pay thinking they'd just pay double.  Now tips and Automatic Gratiuty (or service charages) are treated differently.  Automatic Gratiutity, if given to the employee, is counted as non-tipped wages.  By doing this, the employee gets a more consistent paycheck and the restaurant has a more consistent income vs tips which vary wildly and since tips are often used to offset low wages to meet the minimum wage, it ends up being that the harder an employee works and the more tips they get, the less money the restaurant needs to pay them in a week.  Depends on the restaurant of course.  But you know ALL This, right?  Because you ran a restaurant?


Key point too:

The IRS has the PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN FUND which is funded by $3 payments from taxes.  This is totally voluntary.

So of the 271.5 million tax return in 2023 (https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-irs-data-book) they received $4,703,067.00 (https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/PECF_monthly_report_2023.pdf)
Divide that by $3 and you get 1,567,689 people.  That's how many people clicked that little box.
That's 0.5%.
So, a voluntary tax/funding generated a whooping 0.5% of people who wanted to pay it.  Now, obviously we can't put that to everything but it shows that, when given a choice to spend more money or not, most people won't.

So either put up your own data or go outside and actually talk to people.


2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 16, 2024, 11:47:59 AM »
People who are incontinent do not wear diapers because it's a fetish. Most of them, the ones who can still think, wish they didn't need them at all. They're not on your fetish spectrum.

I've never heard of anyone who loves wearing diapers because they are too lazy to use the toilet. Anyone who says such a thing is lying because they don't want people to know they are ABDL freaks.

Lorddave, stop pretending it's your wife who wants you to wear the diapers.

I have heard of such people.  Typically they have to drive alot.  Its certainly not common, but it exists.

Also: Astronauts wear diapers.
https://www.parentgiving.com/blogs/everything-incontinence/uncommon-knowledge-nasa-astronauts

When Buzz Alderan walked on the moon, he did it in a diaper.

You said - "I love em because I don't have to stop driving/working/spacewalking to pee even tho I'm young."

Did Buzz Alderan "love em" or did he have to wear them whilst pretending to walk on the moon? What would happen if a spaceman pooped in his spacesuit without a diaper?

People who "love em" are fetishists. You are conflating people who need to use a diaper, with people who play with their own feces.

No, I'm using "love them" in the context of convenience.

Like "I love my dishwasher" does not mean I wanna fuck it, it means I love having a dishwasher to use.


And the internet continues to (unfortunately) support my statements.

https://www.quora.com/Do-you-wear-diapers-on-long-trips-just-in-case

I regret reading as far in that thread as I did.

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 16, 2024, 07:12:33 AM »
People who are incontinent do not wear diapers because it's a fetish. Most of them, the ones who can still think, wish they didn't need them at all. They're not on your fetish spectrum.

I've never heard of anyone who loves wearing diapers because they are too lazy to use the toilet. Anyone who says such a thing is lying because they don't want people to know they are ABDL freaks.

Lorddave, stop pretending it's your wife who wants you to wear the diapers.

I have heard of such people.  Typically they have to drive alot.  Its certainly not common, but it exists.

Also: Astronauts wear diapers.
https://www.parentgiving.com/blogs/everything-incontinence/uncommon-knowledge-nasa-astronauts

When Buzz Alderan walked on the moon, he did it in a diaper.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 16, 2024, 01:11:13 AM »
Adult baby diaper lovers is a spectrum!

It was totally a coincidence that this new study turned up on my timeline https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-024-02854-0, which I have not read, but apparently some people who pretend to be hermaphrodites also have paraphilic diaperism.

It is, actually. 

On one side you have it for pure sexual reasons.
On the other, because you're too old to crap in a toilet properly but love knowing you won't make a mess.

There are people who are inbetween.

"I love em because I don't have to stop driving/working/spacewalking to pee even tho I'm young.

"I love them because my wife is into it.  I'm not but its for her."

And so forth.

Everything can be a spectrum when humans are concerned.

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 15, 2024, 11:48:23 AM »
Person 1: Oh, someone left their cellphone here.  I'll just wait til they get back.

-they used in a singular sense when a person's gender is unknown.


but doesn't they in this context imply either he or she but not both?

Only if you think gender isn't a spectrum.

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 15, 2024, 10:21:02 AM »
Non binary isn't quite the same as unknown. At least I don't think it is. Maybe it is.

But I could be wrong. Maybe non binary means a kind of gender superposition where you don't know the gender until you check for yourself.

My understanding of non-binary is that they don't identify with one gender strong enough to present as that gender.  So they present somewhere between, sometimes a little of both.

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 15, 2024, 10:11:24 AM »
Person 1: Oh, someone left their cellphone here.  I'll just wait til they get back.

-they used in a singular sense when a person's gender is unknown.

8
*sigh*
Clearly you've never been to a Jersey shopping mall near the border.

Look, I can't tell if you're too old to remember the 80s or too young to have lived it but we tried the whole "privatize everything".  Didn't work out well.  Turns out, businesses want profit and they aren't gonna be nice about it.  Especially if they own an essential service, like roads, police, hospitals, schools, etc...

Also, you don't seem to know about luxury taxes and it shows.  Its an extra tax on that $233,000 porche.  Like a rich person's sales tax. 
They don't like it.  And you, who are trying to get out of paying any taxes think people are proud to pay 30% sales tax?!  Delusional.

I'm not against new ideas, I'm against bad ones. 

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 14, 2024, 10:18:39 PM »
Every language uses slang, don't they?

Using a double negative is sometimes meant to be kind of funny.

Y'all is a contraction of "you all", it is southern slang, but has now been adopted by the super woke nerds.

"Super woke nerds"?  What do you have against southern folk?

What do you have against reading comprehension? I said it was "adopted" by the super woke nerds. I should have said co-opted, though. I am a southerner. I am Florida Woman.

Super woke nerds also use "folk" a lot, but they usually spell it with an x.

It does not surprise me that Lorddave uses "y'all" but he probably only types it and doesn't speak it. I am the opposite, if you were both here, I would say "y'all are retarted".

Oh no, I speak it too.  I just lack that southern twang.

10

As I have said before: Groceries don't have tax except in a few states.  Like yours.

Also, most of your libraries, cops, and schools have state and federal funding, also.  If you didn't know.

Finally: you really want roads privatized?  How would they male a profit?  And why would you want untrained cops?  American cops are barely trained as it is and you want it worse?

And how about places other than a small town?

Privatized roads in the past were funded by certain roads being tolled. If you've been to New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, or even Virginia, you may have seen one of these (the only one I can think of in VA is Powhite Parkway).

Once again, you think the government should make a profit. The government is not a business. It is (depending on who you ask) either a service organization or a confidence game. In the former case, it should be running at the bare minimum for sustainability, and all involved are volunteers with a real job. Career politicians long since should have gotten said real job and stopped trying to make money off the public. Considering that some Senators and Congress actually work only a few months each year (about 165 days vs the average taxpayer having in some case no breaks in an entire year), it's time we treated this as what it actually is, not volunteers doing a good service, but con artists trying to weasel money from the public. FFS, they get paid vacation time funded by your taxes.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/heres-congress-works/story?id=24810354
You know how we could afford everyone to have tax breaks? Easy, we just cut the salary of these people.

As far as I'm concerned, if you want to live in a big city, your taxes can probably be run by a mayor. Your mayor can use these voluntary offerings to place those green trash cans I see all over cities. His bureaucrats figure out who is and isn't paying for certain services, and act accordingly. Meanwhile, in my small town, we don't have those things. I drive to the dump, or I go and toss trash in a bin, and run before someone sees me like normal people.  ;D You stop paying for trash pickup, they simply take you off the route and repossess your green bins. Yes, I know those are for recycling but you get the idea. It's a very very simple matter to connect payment with addresses.

Voluntaryism works.

The income tax hasn't worked, and you know it by the sheer amount of effort you put into complaining about rich businessmen. Fact: there is not a single person who loopholes their way out of sales tax. You could even set up an incentive system where people can pay more taxes if they want more perks.

But here you are, locked into a one solution (yours, of course) mindset, even though the solution doesn't work and even mass media like VOX know it.
https://www.vox.com/money/2024/3/13/24086102/billionaires-wealthy-tax-avoidance-loopholes
That probably only scratches the surface at how many ways rich people avoid income taxes. Yet you're stuck on this "solution". Think of something else!

And you have no grasp of reality.
You want every road in America to be a toll road? How much would it cost you to drive from home to work if you had to pay for every road you drove on?  Every street?

The government isn't a business and unless you've been avoiding it: they are not making a profit.  Haven't for a long time.

Senators and such work 365.  They may not be in DC all those days but that's a legal requirement.  Senators and representatives must spent a certain amount of time in the area they represent.  I think its 6 months of the year.  Working there, you know, with the people who elect them.  But sure, have it all volunteer.  I'm sure having no income will save the government a hundred million dollars a year and certainly not cause any issues... >_>. Seriously, I did the numners and if you cut all their salaries to 0, every taxpayer would get like a dollar tax saving. 



How many people would pay taxes volunterily?  Would you?  And how much?
And guess what?  Mayors DO handle taxes for cities and they do stop pickup of garbage for non-payers.  So that already happens. 
But hey, go toss it in the dump.  Or a taxpayer's bin you leech!  I'm sure the people who work at the dump are happy volunteers that don't need to be paid. 

As for sales tax loopholes: boy are you an idiot. 
Alot of people have done it.  Hell, I've done it.  I've used a loophole to pay 0 sales tax.  Wanna know how?  I lived in New York, which has sales tax.  I drove to New Jersey, which doesn't have sales tax.  Bought stuff there, tax free, then ... And here's the loophole... Brought it back to New York!  Same thing happens with international shopping.  I've done it between Norway and Sweden.  People do it between USA and Mexico.

Also, plenty of people try to create a tax exempt company, which exempts them from sales tax.  Mostly political action companies (501c i think) or religious exemptions.  So yeah, people do cheat on sales tax. 

11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 14, 2024, 01:11:24 PM »
Every language uses slang, don't they?

Using a double negative is sometimes meant to be kind of funny.

Y'all is a contraction of "you all", it is southern slang, but has now been adopted by the super woke nerds.
I am a super woke nerd from New York and I use Y'all.

12

Then corporate tax is eliminated and replaced with Sales Tax!

How is that working out?

I wouldn't know. Since about 1919 or so, we have paid income taxes.

Whenever a sales tax-only plan is proposed, the raving lunatics in power always scream "Think of the poor! Sales tax cuts their earnings."

Okay, I thought of the poor. Abolish sales taxes on groceries. Since the poor predominantly spend their money buying food, they can save money. Especially since every year, they can choose to save (or not) instead of filling out time-wasting paperwork to get a "refund" on something that was borrowed from them to begin with!

Meanwhile, the millionaires and billionaires you hate so much for avoiding paying their fair share now pay their fair share. Why are you still opposing this?

You think government is necessary. Living in a small town, I can tell you that only the barest form is necessary. You have cops, libraries, schools, and a post office. Some stuff can be left to private businesses (roads for instance), some stuff can be left to charities, and some can be done by individuals. For that matter, cops can be replaced by people pooling wealth toward a bounty to catch known criminals.

As I have said before: Groceries don't have tax except in a few states.  Like yours.

Also, most of your libraries, cops, and schools have state and federal funding, also.  If you didn't know.

Finally: you really want roads privatized?  How would they male a profit?  And why would you want untrained cops?  American cops are barely trained as it is and you want it worse?

And how about places other than a small town?

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 13, 2024, 09:05:35 PM »
I have used two negative words in the same sentence many times here. and then one of the well-known globalist here who has English as native language said that was wrong. I corrected this mistake. Now, when I warn the person who made this mistake, some globalists say that this is not actually wrong, while another group associates my attitude with being a flat earther. lol. another example thou shalt never trust a globalist.

English is weird.

Typically, yes, a double negative is wrong.  But American English often creates wrong things.

Y'all, for example, is part of American English despite not being a real word otherwise.

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 13, 2024, 10:46:29 AM »
It is complete nonsense that after the United Nations general assembly approves a country's membership, the decision goes to the security council. In general, it is correct and logical for the majority to approve joining the community.

Members of the United Nations security council supervise all decisions like a big brother above other members. It's like preventing it from turning into a disaster if the other members make a decision for the world's evil. The decision made by the majority must be valid, whether right or wrong.
In our example, even if 80 percent of the members accept, only one member will veto the decision because he is a member of the Security Council and Palestine will not succeed in becoming a member in its rightful cause.

This situation brings into question the role and reliability of the United Nations in general.

I do not disagree.
Wut?

Here, only I can use two negative suffixes or words in the same sentence.

It means that I find no reason to disagree with you but I have not decided if I fully agree.
I know what it means. But this meaning is used in Turkish. We use such an expression when we don't have a reason to disagree with something, when we actually need to participate, when we don't want to do it, or when we want to postpone it for now. But this is valid for Turkish.

I'm sure you're aware that this is complete nonsense for English. So much so that even I don't use it anymore from for a while.

While it is not gramatically correct, it is valid and in the general American english lexicon.  It is not nonsense as you understood it find.

15
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 13, 2024, 01:52:13 AM »
It is complete nonsense that after the United Nations general assembly approves a country's membership, the decision goes to the security council. In general, it is correct and logical for the majority to approve joining the community.

Members of the United Nations security council supervise all decisions like a big brother above other members. It's like preventing it from turning into a disaster if the other members make a decision for the world's evil. The decision made by the majority must be valid, whether right or wrong.
In our example, even if 80 percent of the members accept, only one member will veto the decision because he is a member of the Security Council and Palestine will not succeed in becoming a member in its rightful cause.

This situation brings into question the role and reliability of the United Nations in general.

I do not disagree.
Wut?

Here, only I can use two negative suffixes or words in the same sentence.

It means that I find no reason to disagree with you but I have not decided if I fully agree.

16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 11, 2024, 11:15:55 AM »
It is complete nonsense that after the United Nations general assembly approves a country's membership, the decision goes to the security council. In general, it is correct and logical for the majority to approve joining the community.

Members of the United Nations security council supervise all decisions like a big brother above other members. It's like preventing it from turning into a disaster if the other members make a decision for the world's evil. The decision made by the majority must be valid, whether right or wrong.
In our example, even if 80 percent of the members accept, only one member will veto the decision because he is a member of the Security Council and Palestine will not succeed in becoming a member in its rightful cause.

This situation brings into question the role and reliability of the United Nations in general.

I do not disagree.

17
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 07, 2024, 09:42:48 AM »
UK gives Ukraine green light to use British weapons inside Russia.

This gives Russia the right to allow Russian weapons to be used against Britain by Britain's enemies.

For example, Russia could donate some of its Russian nuclear submarines to the Houthis, and these ships could easily send London to the other side of the doomsday calendar. I condemn David Cameron for risking Jura's life and the whole people living in entire NATO.

1. Russia could have done that already.  Nothing is actually stopping them.
2. The Thames isn't that deep.  You aren't getting a nuclear sub in there to blow up London.
3. Doesn't Jura live in Austrailia?


Thank you Wise for your concern, if the Houthis come King Arthur will rise with his knights from Glastonbury and defeat them.

Dave this just shows your mind is slipping, the fuck I am an Aussie!
Do I sound like Jacky? A brain baked twisted incell, I may not be a flag waving monarchist harping back to the days of Gloriana, building palisades on the white cliffs of dover, but the blood that courses (albeit a bit sluggishly these days) is blue, infused with tea, alcohol and a sense of mild superiority despite the sun having set long since on an empire built on blood, steam and afternoon tiffin.

My appologies.  I thought you were from Austrailia.

18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 06, 2024, 04:07:19 AM »
UK gives Ukraine green light to use British weapons inside Russia.

This gives Russia the right to allow Russian weapons to be used against Britain by Britain's enemies.

For example, Russia could donate some of its Russian nuclear submarines to the Houthis, and these ships could easily send London to the other side of the doomsday calendar. I condemn David Cameron for risking Jura's life and the whole people living in entire NATO.

1. Russia could have done that already.  Nothing is actually stopping them.
2. The Thames isn't that deep.  You aren't getting a nuclear sub in there to blow up London.
3. Doesn't Jura live in Austrailia?

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 02, 2024, 06:57:35 AM »
https://x.com/DanaBashCNN/status/1785725450527842512

Quote
Today: Destruction, violence and hate overtake college campuses across the country with Jewish students feeling unsafe at their own schools. It is unacceptable, and harkening back to the 1930s in Europe. Our @InsidePolitics show open, here.

When I read the tweet I thought it was Fox News, but this is CNN. I do not think it helps anyone to be this hyperbolic. Yes, there has been some antisemitism from the pro Palestine side, but no one is rounding up the Jews.

The House just passed the "Antisemitism Awareness Act" with only 21 Republicans voting nay, and 70 Democrats voting nay. We are on the verge of Congress passing hate speech laws, which will take an act of the Supreme Court to strike down.

So just like Europe.

20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: May 02, 2024, 02:36:57 AM »
18% ?

It is too ridiculous to be funny.

All places that appear east of the Dnieper River on the map and are light colored (except yellow) are Russian military operations areas. The fact that Russians allow Ukrainian people to live in this region does not indicate that these places are under Ukraine's control.

There is talk in the Middle Eastern media whether the Russians will be able to finish off Ukraine this summer. You westerners still think there is a balanced war with Russia. This is similar to the attitude of the German people, who thought they had won the war until they saw Russian tanks in Berlin. I pity for you westerners.

But those areas aren't 50% of Ukraine.  They're 18%.  Please go do your own math on area.

Also, its been a long war.  If Russia could finish it off by summer, they would have finished it long ago.

Also, German people knew they were losing for a while.

But hey, lets see where this is in the fall.

21
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/04/corporations-dont-pay-corporate-taxes-people-do/

Interesting. It's almost like something I've been saying before.

Quote
First, corporations do not pay any corporate tax — individuals do. That is because companies pass on their costs. Some of the tax is paid by consumers, who pay higher prices. Company employees pay some of the tax through lower wages. And investors’ retirement accounts pay some of the tax through lower returns.

So, while it might be good politics to stick it to big corporations — or at least to posture that way in front of voters and television cameras — a corporate tax-rate hike would not accomplish its intended goal. Instead, taxes are paid by individuals who then get less for their money, receive smaller paychecks, and have a harder time saving for retirement.
Quote
The Tax Foundation’s Stephen J. Entin estimated in 2017 that labor pays 70 percent or more of the corporate tax. Differences aside, these studies share a common conclusion: Ultimately, corporations themselves pay no corporate tax.

No matter how much you might want to, you simply can't tax corporations. You wind up taxing yourself.

Then corporate tax is eliminated and replaced with Sales Tax!

How is that working out?

22
Alert: An Admission of Epic Proportions’: Health Canada Confirms DNA Plasmid Contamination of COVID Vaccines

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of DNA contamination in Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines and also confirmed that Pfizer did not disclose the contamination to the public health authority.

The DNA contamination includes the Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoter and enhancer Pfizer did not previously disclose and that some experts say is a cancer risk due to potential integration with the human genome.

Health Canada, the country’s public health authority, told The Epoch Times that while Pfizer provided the full DNA sequences of the plasmid in its vaccine at the time of the initial submission, the vaccine maker “did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence.”

“Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission,” it said.

Health Canada’s admission came after two scientists, Kevin McKernan and Phillip J. Buckhaults, Ph.D., discovered the presence of bacterial plasmid DNA in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines at levels potentially 18-70 times higher than the limits set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency.

They tested four expired Pfizer and Moderna vaccine vials “thought to only contain mRNA” and found to contain “double-stranded DNA plasmids.”

Health Canada said, “We have concluded that the risk/benefit profile continues to support the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine,” and that it does rely on manufacturer claims but “conducts an in-depth independent review” to make sure the vaccines meet “our high standards for safety, efficacy and quality.”

Janci Lindsay, Ph.D., director of toxicology and molecular biology for Toxicology Support Services, told The Defender this statement is “silly, not believable and not defendable,” adding that “We should not have to do the research that they should have done.”

“Why are the FDA, CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and the mainstream media still silent about this?” asked Steve Kirsch, founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, adding that “the mainstream medical community is silent as well.”

Viral immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle of the University of Guelph in Canada, commenting on Health Canada’s admission wrote on his Substack, “This is an admission of epic proportions.”
#Canada #Pfizer

https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1784161745503752522

You're 6 months too late.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/patricia-tish-conlin-rhn-a16a8a225_exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-activity-7122929372843409409-DNs2


Also, this happened in the polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963. 

23
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: April 27, 2024, 02:26:27 AM »
Its the same between Europe and US.

Tho foxnews.com now has a free article limit.  Welp...

24
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: April 27, 2024, 02:19:20 AM »
From foxnews.com 11:16 CET april 27, 2024.



25
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: April 27, 2024, 02:12:52 AM »
On Fox News the headline is "Top cop sounds off against 'entitled hateful students' as antisemitism roils colleges".  So lumping anything critical of the IDF into antisemitism.

Perhaps you are not aware that the "headlines" they show you are not the same as what they show others.  It is at least partly based on your history of what you click on.

That would be true for feeds that are based on an algorithm but I'm looking at the front page of WAPO, NYT and Fox News.  I believe those are the same between all viewers.

They may not be.  International viewers mah get a different page.  Would have to look at the code.

26
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: April 24, 2024, 10:15:37 PM »
This is so bizarre.  The universities suspend protesters for unspecified reasons then have arrested for trespassing.  Now the same people going on and on about free speech and cancel culture are demanding the national guard to break up these protests.  The MSM on the left and the right are sliming it as antisemitic but I can't find any evidence of this.

Criticizing Israel is automatically antisemitic, for some reason.  So if you're pro-palastine, you're anti-Israel and thus... Antisemitic.  Which makes no sense but that's America.

Maybe the Jews DO own all Media?

27
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: War
« on: April 24, 2024, 01:30:47 AM »
https://x.com/thedailybeast/status/1782169236657357193
Quote
When Isra Hirsi, the daughter of U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, joined several of her classmates in a pro-Palestinian campus protest known as the Gaza encampment, she had no idea she would end up suspended, homeless, and left without food within a matter of days.

Homeless and starving!
The Palistinisn experience.

28
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Why do you support donald trump
« on: April 22, 2024, 03:11:31 PM »


We're starting to get unconfirmed reports that Donald Trump has trained his body to release some kind of bioweapon in the courts.

Uncalled for. Everyone farts, no need to shame him for it.

29
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Fallout
« on: April 20, 2024, 01:11:34 PM »
I've been watching too.
I'm on like episode 7?  Don't recall.
I've played fallout 3 and thats it so not totally new.

I've been loving it.  Didn't think I would, but I do!

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 523