Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You've yet to provide any evidence that has not priorly been debunked.
right.
The creation of God, should he exist, is much like the creation of existence (as in, the stuff that made the Big Bang). The need for a creator arises from the assumption that it was created, when in reality it was likely always there.
Also, since God is an 8th dimensional being he may well have created himself.
Alright. I'll use small words. Things would look very, very different if plate tectonics were real.
The ice wall is just Antarctica.
Now, ignoring any argument that relies on god, Why is the earth flat?
In what way does this question make any sense whatsoever if we aren't using an argument that relies on a Creator?
Why does the answer rely on a creator?
Because asking "why" implies intention. A purpose.
At the edge of the atmosphere in FET you are looking down at a circle.
At the edge of the atmosphere in RET you are looking down at a Sphere.
It looks like we're at an impasse then, doesn't it?
Better luck next time Round Earthers.
At the edge of the atmosphere in FET you are looking down at a circle.
Now, ignoring any argument that relies on god, Why is the earth flat?
In what way does this question make any sense whatsoever if we aren't using an argument that relies on a Creator?
Actually rational thought would avoid making unfounded assumptions regarding a creator and its properties.
Unless of course you have incredible, previously unknown knowledge to share with man-kind.
It seems you are impossible to discuss a topic with. I would liken it to attempting to force a calculator to divide by zero. I can press enter all day but it will never process such an equation. Likewise, I could post over and over again that your questions have been answered and you would never know. You cannot comprehend what is going on and you never will. I do not pity you.
What do you mean by who made him? How does that question make sense and how is that a relevant question?
It's an utterly ridiculous question. If indeed there is a Creator, and He indeed had some reason in mind for making the Earth flat, how are we as mere mortals to divine His infinite intentions?
Tausami has already answered both of your original questions. The earth has always been more or less in the same continental state it is in right now. You seem to have trouble seeing how that answers your questions. Are you even aware of what you're asking?
I'm not seeing any curvature. All I see is flatness on the first picture and a circle on the second picture. As FET predicts, being that high up you would indeed see a circular light pattern due to the sun's light. This is not the first time this has been posted, which is why I laughed. You round earthers try the same things over and over again. Its pathetic, really.
Tausami has already answered both of those questions.
Oh, look, the fool completely ran out of arguments.
A highly accurate source of information with much research behind it.
I take it you're a Baptist?
I'm not Christian, but I take many different bibles into account. Your "science" is as incoherent as it is silly and implausible.
Actually, the lack of existence of plate tectonics is completely relevant. The Earth was formed as it is, more or less. There are other threads about this.
Not to my question, which is hypothetical and assumes it exists, regardless of whether it is real or not.
But presuming Plate Tectonics didn't exist, how would Volcanoes and Earthquakes be explained? What about continental Drift? What about Fossil Records?
Volcanoes have nothing to do with tectonics. They're just holes into the Earth from which magma can spew. Earthquakes come when the aforementioned magma creates a massive cavern, much like a caldera, which then collapses. Continental drift doesn't exist, and what about the fossil records?
I believe that subterranean dragons are the source of terrestrial volcanoes, and submarine dragons (i.e. sea serpents) are the source of underwater volcanoes. Very few species of dinosaurs were ever recorded to be on multiple continents. These are thought to be cattle for some larger, dominant, intelligent dinosaur which traded them between continents.
That's actually a pretty interesting Belief. How did you come to it?
Various biblical references.
I believe that subterranean dragons are the source of terrestrial volcanoes, and submarine dragons (i.e. sea serpents) are the source of underwater volcanoes. Very few species of dinosaurs were ever recorded to be on multiple continents. These are thought to be cattle for some larger, dominant, intelligent dinosaur which traded them between continents.
Actually, the lack of existence of plate tectonics is completely relevant. The Earth was formed as it is, more or less. There are other threads about this.
Plate tectonics does not exist.
Or there's mine, which assumes that gravity exists but has less of an effect than the UA.
And the Death Star blew up Alderaan. Your point?
A fake picture of a fake death star=a real picture taken on the moon?
A fake picture of a fake Death Star= a fake picture taken on a fake moon.
Oh how my eyes deceive me, I see the moon in the sky every night.
And that's not where that picture was taken.
Where was that picture taken then? I expect evidence to backup your claims as well.
Maybe Arizona, Nevada, etc. You get the point.
And the Death Star blew up Alderaan. Your point?
A fake picture of a fake death star=a real picture taken on the moon?
A fake picture of a fake Death Star= a fake picture taken on a fake moon.
When heat treating items, we are subjected to temperatures nearing 2000 degrees F.
Yeah...right. Even if this is true, what you are describing is not even remotely comparable.
There are more issues than just the question, "Is it possible?" If we assume that it is possible to design such suits, surely we can agree that they must have tested the suits extensively to determine that they would protect the "astronauts" from the 250 degrees of radiation heat. Or would the astronauts just say, "What the heck, these suits will probably work."? A person would have to be crazy to walk into 250 degrees without being certain that the suits would protect them. But there is hardly ever any mention of the issue. In fact, most people are oblivious to the fact that the alleged astronauts were subjected to 250 degrees of radiation heat on the moon. I bet most people probably think it was cold on the moon where the astronauts were.
If they were really surviving in such extreme temperatures, it would be talked about by NASA a lot more. It would be considered a much bigger part of the story than it is. As things are, it is not really part of the story at all. It's one of those things that NASA doesn't want people to think about.
