The Challenge has an international audience.
It is surprising Russian or Chinese individuals/groups have not logged in with an entry for it seems they have expertise capable of making an entry?
If it's not a machine providing the solution, it may take an international coordinated effort.
What type of awful statement is this? Number one they don't care what a crack pot says, offering to pay fake monopoly money. Number two they are busy actually "doing" and not fantasy theorizing over delusions.
Have you been living under a rock during this whole thread? What is your obsession with Anders?
Even if Anders did have a pot to piss in, do you really think they care about a "million" euro?? That is less than a fraction of a penny for a normal individual to a government.
What we don't know is if a person or group is going to announce they are working to solve the Challenge or how close they are to the solution?
It doesn't matter to me who is hosting the competition, it is rather that I don't personally know how to even begin solving it. I keep stressing other people and groups, perhaps, to motivate myself to seek out those that could solve it.
I understand there is chatter as to legitimacy but what a strange thing to present such a proposition and not have some semblance of earnestness to it?
Well one of his challenges, is ridiculous. Basically building an a bomb and set it off over his house. Even then as he is turned to mush he will deny it lol. Just the type person he is.
However, people want to see if the prize is actually there (which it has been proven 100 percent it is not) because there is alot of time involved with this challenge, who wants to waste their time? Especially most who would do this does not question the legitimacy of the official narrative on this subject. So it would strictly be for financial gain.
Also....when you are disagreeing with 99 percent of the populous, science community, and people who "do it for a living". Alleging a multi nation, mathematically close to impossible cover up, and not just cover up, but active measures to perpetuate the cover-up with "fake" actions, history ect. Along with all the other implications that assertions such as these arise......
I would say the burden of proof is on the accuser...not the accused. Just like when a group comes and wants to prove someone's innocence and get them released from jail. They don't just re open the case on a whim....it is your responsibility to provide the solid proof to justify reopening the case, without it they are still guilty.
Now the only thing I agree with Anders on is his 9/11 challenge. But that is different. People called bullshit the first week after...then just perpetuated after that. It isn't just dreamers who are saying not possible, it is thousands up on thousands of PhD engineers, pilots, military officials etc etc etc(even a first yeah engineering student will laugh at the official story). People who are involved in multiple relative fields for a living...including myself whom I have stated before I was part of a research group for the movement with hands on experimentation.
Not to mention the fact 65 percent of the populous in America wants to have a private funded and ran investigation for it.
So if you bring something like this to the table....such as a multitude of nuclear engineers and others in the field saying "this is bullshit" ...an entire narrative that has 1000s upon 1000s of holes in it etc etc. Then I might turn an eye.
However, a crack pot proven liar that can't even tell a difference between a curb and a street.....don't think I or anyone else of sound mind will be listening any time soon.