I have mixed feelings about Tito
I have a question for you as well. What is your stance towards Turkey in the EU?
First, the European Union should be dissolved because as an anti-Christian organization which attacks legitmate sovereignty, it is a tool of jewish zionists.
Second, to the extent that Turkish membership would give more power to the Turklish government, then I obviously oppose Turkish membership in the EU. The Turkish government has for a long time been composed of two factors:
1) A Jewish clique known as the Donmeh
2) The Turkish Military
http://www.grecoreport.com/the_young_turks_who_were_they.htmhttp://www.dr-jurjevic.org/clanci/turkey_china.htmhttp://www.jrbooksonline.com/HTML-docs/The%20Real%20Jew%20-%20Turkey.htmJosip Broz Tito was a jew. He worked for Bela Kun's jewish bolshevik government in Hungary until it was dislodged circa 1920 by Orthodox Romania. When Kun's government fell, most of the jewish Bolshevik refugees from Hungary found refuge in Masonic and jewish lodges in Zagreb, Croatia. Tito was one of these. During the interwar years, these lodges connected him with William Stephenson of the British Secret Service. Yugoslavia was a joint creation of the British Secret Service and the jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith (the ADL which has always been associated with the mafia, in Meyer Lansky's and Tito's era and today in Brezovsky's era - Berezovsky's real name is Boris Abramovich, the richest man in Russia). Yugoslavia was ultimately a Jewish creation. The fact that Tito was a British agent explains his split with Stalin. It also explains why he was unwilling to give help to the communists in the Greek Civil War in their fight against the Nazis as well as the British. Tito did not fight the Nazis initially. He ONLY turned aginst them once it became politically convenient. This is in sharp contrast to Draza Mihailovic who always opposed the Nazis and yet ended his days by being murdered ("executed") by Tito for allegedly (and demonstrably false) pro-Nazi activity.
I endorse the concept of a unified greater SERBIA. The only thing that would entitle a reconsideration is if the papists and mohammedans of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Skopje, and Albania became genuine Orthodox Christians (along with their governments).
Yes, Skopje is the name - not Macedonia. Skopje is historically Slavic and belongs to Serbia. And with the name of its capitol city, Skopje. The name 'Macedonia' was given to Skopje for the first time ever by Tito in 1945.