1

The Lounge / So I havent been here in quite some time

« on: January 23, 2007, 09:25:48 PM »

I have been quite busy, but yea, I was recently reminded of this awesome forum in physics today.  I was talking to my teacher, and we got on the subject of dark energy, and how it causes the world to expand, and we got on the idea that that could be a source of antimass.  Now, if that were the case, I was thinking, since reletivity makes it so that the more mass you have, the more impossible it is to get to the speed of light, the more amounts of energy you would need.

In a graph of energy vs speed per given mass, it seems as though the energy needed per unit mass to get to a specific speed increases exponentially, reaching an asymptote at the speed of light.

So I came to think, since there should be an antimass for any given mass, the rules should be reversed, since it is the opposite of mass...  

given the same kind of rules, it seems to me that antimass should reach a similar asymptote, but on the other side, so the mass would get exponentially either larger or smaller (I wouldnt know how to tell, because it could be convergent or divergent), but either way it comes to the conclusion that antimass would always have to be going at a greater speed than light to be maintained.


so someone (iirc its probably gonna be Eras or Engineer) please tell me if that made any sense

2

The Lounge / Citizenship.

« on: November 09, 2006, 04:50:03 PM »

How many can one person have?

please post country of residence and citizenship req's (if you know them)

3

Arts & Entertainment / Metal (music) Thread

« on: November 05, 2006, 06:33:25 PM »

To help out beast, who was aparently angered with us

Metal is wonderful

4

The Lounge / my avatar.

« on: September 06, 2006, 10:40:04 PM »

can anyone get a picture and make it capable of being an avatar for me.

I'm retarded and cannot.

5

The Lounge / Congrats to the new mods

« on: August 13, 2006, 11:23:20 PM »

Congratulations Dogplatter and 6strings!

I hope for a new age of less spam and more true ideas!

6

The Lounge / Cleaning up the slack

« on: July 19, 2006, 11:55:14 PM »

Dear Moderators, I was just looking through the memberlist, and it seems as though there are are a rediculous amount of people that do not/have not posted.  Would it be prudent to simply delete anyone who has not contributed  at all, in the first, oh lets say, 40 pages?

It just seems they are taking up space and doing nothing.

7

Flat Earth Q&A / Voliva's flat Earth map debate

« on: July 19, 2006, 11:43:18 PM »

That seems like a good, historicesque map.
In your opinion is that better or worse than the computer generated one?

8

Flat Earth Q&A / Can someone with a good background of Calculus come in here

« on: July 17, 2006, 05:02:41 PM »

Hello,

Could someone with good calculus skill calculate the instantaneous rate of change for the earth, basically the amound in which the earths curvature changes at any one spot, please?

I would do it, but sadly am not wellenough versed in the math

9

Flat Earth Q&A / Conspiracy?

« on: June 14, 2006, 10:14:20 PM »

I was reading in the FAQ that the collective governments do not shut this website down, because it would show they are hiding something.

doesnt this website in itself show that the government is trying to hide something, and therefore making this whole point invalid.

It seems to me that if the collective governments would want shut this website down, there would be more danger in allowing this website to operate and show allowing people to see the blasphemous views contained herein.  On a similar note, wouldnt the governments hire people to destroy the theory in every way possible, in order to make the thoery seem totally implausible?

10

Flat Earth Q&A / Prove me wrong please

« on: June 14, 2006, 10:02:32 PM »

I know this will eventually be moved to the angry section i would still like a response beforehand

It seems to me, that they have all these crazy theorys, with basically nothing to back them up, i can do the same


the world is in fact a dream, everyone who disagrees is part of a conspiracy set up by the nightmare people to keep us from knowing the truth, we dont know how they are doing it, we also dont know why, because they are gaining nothing... but i have proof, the bible is written about it, the armageddon is awakening, simple as that.  noone can disprove this theory, as if you are even going to start, i am going to say youre incorrect due to the fact that you have no proof this is not a dream, and anything you can think of is part of the conspiracy


^basically the exact same ideal behind the FE theory

11

Flat Earth Q&A / Sun/Moon

« on: June 14, 2006, 09:52:06 PM »

It seems to me that the Sun and Moon theory posed in the FE mode of thinking is flawed.  

The Faq states that both are merely spotlights, and ignoring earthshine and such things, there would be no percievable situation where the "hot light" and "cold light" would not miss a spot, because since there is intersection (there are many times in which the sun and moon are out in the same time) there must be a situiation in which neither are in a spot, leaving total darkness, which never happens, even during the new moon, there is always some light,  if the spotlights are not shining upon this spot, how could this be?