Within the last 5-6 years, more or less, our ever more advancing technologies, combined with the plethora of companies who compete against others in the same industries for our dollars, changed the entire world, and WILL continue to change the world, even though few people know it today, it will be known by the world, one day, as I see it as being inevitable.

There are many, many different videos, taken by different people, and different points on Earth, over the last few years.

Using a new instrument, which came out in 2015, the Nikon Coolpix P900, a highly advanced camera, that took images, AND videos, much like other cameras did, of course, but they couldn't magnify up close enough on stars, being small, and distant, until today.

We COULD see them up close, and have seen them up close, perhaps for 10-15 years or so, maybe longer than that, it doesn't matter, anyway. It's considered to be caused by improper technique or procedures for HOW TO MAGNIFY ON STARS WITH TELESCOPES, or ANY INSTRUMENT WHICH CAN MAGNIFY THE STARS, even those that have yet to be invented in future, because they didn't make up that 'unique procedure', to magnify the stars, because it makes any sense at all, when anyone should realize it is completely stupid, which will only result in garbage images and videos, of any object in the distance, based on our previous knowledge and experience of using such processes before.

That, and similar techniques, are very rarely used at all, because they are used for SPECIAL EFFECTS, or part of some effect, etc.

They have actually told the entire world, have taught in our schools, that all the stars above us, each and every night, are so very, very far away from us, they are all TRILLIONS of miles from the Earth, and that's why they appear to look like tiny points of light, from the Earth, and everyone said, 'ok, I believe you on all that', which means nobody can prove you wrong, OR prove you right, or doesn't care about it, and goes with whatever is said to be true.

Of course, when we're TOLD that we MUST use this procedure, which we have NEVER used to film any objects, either near to us, or at a distance away from us, and never would, because it doesn't work at all, unless for an effect of some type, mainly. 

That absurd claim, that we must always use this procedure to 'properly, accurately, realistically', see stars through magnification, no matter how much it is magnified, or what the instrument is,  that is the ONLY method used to see stars up close, as they 'really look like' from the Earth, through magnification.

If you really don't know it's complete BS, nobody lets in all external light, and slows down shutter speed to a crawl, you'll never see the object properly, as it actually looks like, in a close up view of it. Especially when the object has light, as do all the stars, have light, which is why they used it for this 'method', of how to 'correctly' view stars, through magnification!

That's obviously why stars always look like tiny points of light, and so would ANY OTHER object that appears as a point of light at a distance, when seen at night, with blackness around it.

I've already told you this before, many times, it's just a trick, they made up, and fooled us, at first, anyway.

I'm never going to convince you that stars are NOT trillions of miles away, which makes you ALSO believe what they claim about a special, unique method, that must be used, to properly, accurately view the stars, through magnification.

When I tell you that this 'method' is crap, any other light would look like a point of light, using that same method, and prove it is absolute BS, too.....you ignore it, and keep saying it is an effect of atmosphere, same as always.
 
There is simply NO reason we would ever use such a blatantly STUPID procedure, and we DON'T use it, ever, because it IS stupid to ever use.

If you don't understand WHAT HAPPENS when using this procedure, why we never use this procedure anywhere else at all, BUT for stars, then so be it.

All I can do is keep showing you close up videos of stars, that show details on them, and that these details change position, as the star moves around.

There ARE no such effects that exist, which could ever cause all this, or we'd have known and seen it countless times already, but not one, ever, proves your claim is all nonsense.

Such fine details, and depth of the star, and a vivid blue color, which is only on one part of the star, and when we see all of the details, the area of depth, and the specific area that is blue in color, all change their positions, while the star rotates, endlessly, constantly, at high speed, so we must look at each frame of the video, to see all of this.

Stars all look and move differently, some less distinct from other stars, some that look COMPLETELY different from other stars, which also proves it IS the star itself, which looks like that, and moves like that.

Why does this bother you so much, or why WOULD it bother you so much, to accept it IS the stars themselves, which move around, have details, and depth, and have a vivid color, on a specific part of the star, all which change position, matching up to the star's movements?

It's nothing to fear, it is absolutely remarkable, and stunning to see.