Nuclear Power Exaggerated

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 08:10:16 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:03:38 PM

Here is the correct excerpt from the 1954 amendment. It seems essentially unchanged. (Sorry it took me a bit to find it)

68 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 703-AUG . 30, 1954 959

"SEC. 224. COMMUNICATION OF RESTRICTED DATA.—

Whoever, lawfully or unlawfully, having possession of, access to, control
over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, sketch, photograph,
plan, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information involving or
incorporating Restricted Data—
"a. communicates, transmits, or discloses the same to any individual
or person, or attempts or conspires to do any of the foregoing,
with intent to injure the United States or with intent to
secure an advantage to any foreign nation, upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished by death or imprisonment for life (but
the penalty of death or imprisonment for life may be imposed only
upon recommendation of the jury), or by a fine of not more than
$20,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both;
"b. communicates, transmits, or discloses the same to any individual
or person, or attempts or conspires to do any of the foregoing,
with reason to believe such data will be utilized to injure
the United States or to secure an advantage to any foreign nation
shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than
$10,000 or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both.


SEC. 225. RECEIPT OF RESTRICTED DATA.—

Whoever, with intent to injure the United States or with intent to secure an
advantage to any foreign nation, acquires, or attempts or conspires to
acquire any document, writing, sketch, photograph, plan, model,
instrument, appliance, note, or information involving or incorporating
Restricted Data shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by death or
imprisonment for life (but the penalty of death or imprisonment for life may be
imposed only upon recommendation of the jury), or by a fine of not
more than $20,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years,
or both.

It seems communicating restricted data about US a-bombs, which I do at my website, is still punished by death. Tough US laws!

Only if the data truly is truly restricted, and it was disclosed with the intent to injure the United States. And even if those criteria were met, it still does not mean you would be punished by death. That is just the maximum punishment they could inflict. My guess is they would sentence you to an old folks home with only supervised access to the internet.

BTW was your intent to injure the United States?

I will be confirming all this with a legal expert in the next week or two. I highly doubt you have any classified information.Your idea of what qualifies as classified is definitely wrong.

Thanks. The worst case scenario remains penalty by death and as I avoid any such risks, I stay away from USA. My intent remains the same - to inform that nuclear weapons are a hoax to scare people, which seems to be restricted data in the USA, I have been told. It was only much later that one of my visitors told me about the US law, etc, etc.

Actually it was my findings about Wismut AG that convinced me nuclear weapons is a stupid hoax. Wismut AG produced the uranium for the Stalin a-bomb 1949 but it was apparently just communist propaganda. A friend of mine worked for Wismut AG at the time and ended up in jail and was tortured by KGB 1958 in the process. Stalin was a friend of FDR and together they invented their a-bombs. Prove me wrong and collect €1M in one of my Challenges, as I use to say.

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Heiwa,

I would like to know if you disclosed your self-labeled "restricted data" with the intent to injure the United States?

Thanks.

Boots

Quote from: markjo on January 28, 2017, 06:06:13 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 05:57:32 PM

Hm, poor Bohr could not really explain how fission worked 1945/62; how a neutron splits an atom into other atoms, creating more neutrons and releasing energy and the time it takes.

Who said that fission creates neutrons?

OK - fission releases neutrons. Happy?

Gee, if you were wrong about something simple like that, then just imagine what else you could be wrong about.

Like, just about everything.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:54:18 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

But clearly not restricted, which was the point.

Heiwa,

I would like to know if you disclosed your self-labeled "restricted data" with the intent to injure the United States?

Thanks.

Boots

Well, when I made my a-bomb webpage, I had no idea about the US law making it illegal and punished by death to publish it. It was only later a visitor of my site alerted me and my legal council has later confirmed the risks/findings.

US laws and legal processes are what they are.

I have heard and read about people being kidnapped by USA and brought to Guantanamo and tortured to admit all sorts of crimes (terrorism) that they have never heard of. The POTUS GWB issued an executive order that permitted torture, so US armed forces had to find and train people to torture. Result?

Nobody has admitted anything and nobody has been found guilty of terrorism at Guantanamo or anywhere else in USA, except a Frenchman that is accused of having been the 20th Arab to hijack planes on 911 but was so stupid that he missed the plane.

But this is OT. If you think that nuclear weapons exist and function as stated - the famous FLASHES - that vaporize any persons in the vicinity, please provide some evidence for it ... and not puerile nonsense.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:02:46 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:54:18 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

But clearly not restricted, which was the point.

Don't you understand? US a-bombs are propaganda. They do not work since 1945! It is a big hoax. To make it appear that they work, US produces a lot of propaganda, which is made restricted info and then they threaten people to be punished by death to discuss it.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 08:10:16 PM

It seems communicating restricted data about US a-bombs, which I do at my website, is still punished by death. Tough US laws!

you'd have to first have restricted data.  You don't.
 
IF you did, then why is your site hosted on a server in the US?

No, all of this is a fantasy made up by you to make you feel more important.  You really took it hard when your hull design was rejected, didn't you?

The restricted data are defined by US laws and it appears I publish it at my website as explained above. It is correct that one of my ISPs is located in the USA. It was one that offered free web services 20 years ago, if it could put adverts on the pages. Today I pay $4.95 per month without ads. It works fine.

Re my hull (tanker) design I describe it at http://heiwaco.com/ce_coulombiegg.htm .

1988 a US flag tanker T/T Exxon Valdez went accidentally aground in US waters and spilt plenty oil. The American Master was arrested - it was all his fault as usual. He was many years later declared not guilty - it was an accident. Anyway, being in the oil tanker business since late 1960's, we discussed the matter at United Nations International Maritime Organization, IMO, in London, and it was decided to encourage better oil tanker designs! Everyone, incl. USA was for better oil tanker designs than the single hulls used until then. The work for better designs started around 1990.

I had a great idea of better oil tanker design based on a probabilistic approach - put the protection where the risk of spills are the greatest - and September 1997, my design was approved by the IMO according all international rules/laws. The next day USA informed the IMO that they didn't agree, my design was not allowed in US waters, and USA withdrew from the international rules/laws and created its own (OPA90).

Everyone was surprised! Here USA had worked hard at the IMO for better and safer oil tanker designs since 1988 and when finally one design (the only one, in fact - mine) was approved, USA decided to abandon the whole work and go alone.
 
Why was that? I was not alone. I had investors and supporters paying me. And we were approached by US interestes that wanted to buy the design concept before it was approved. We didn't sell! The buyers got upset and threatened us.
 
And the result was that the design was made illegal in the USA. US law OPA90 does not allow it. It has been discussed in Congress. I have testified there.

It seems that the POTUS GWB encouraged by Ms. Condoleezza Rice issued an executive order to this effect. Condi never liked me and I never liked her. Condi loved starting wars, while my companye Heiwa prefers peace. And here we are 20 years later. Me happy in sunny southern France, Condi unhappy in the San Francisco fog.

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 11:07:03 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:02:46 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:54:18 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

But clearly not restricted, which was the point.

Don't you understand? US a-bombs are propaganda. They do not work since 1945! It is a big hoax. To make it appear that they work, US produces a lot of propaganda, which is made restricted info and then they threaten people to be punished by death to discuss it.

Yeah, that makes sense. Make propaganda restricted. This is exactly what propaganda is for.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:22:25 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 11:07:03 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:02:46 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:54:18 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

But clearly not restricted, which was the point.

Don't you understand? US a-bombs are propaganda. They do not work since 1945! It is a big hoax. To make it appear that they work, US produces a lot of propaganda, which is made restricted info and then they threaten people to be punished by death to discuss it.

Yeah, that makes sense. Make propaganda restricted. This is exactly what propaganda is for.

In this case extra tough! Death sentence if you argue.

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:59:29 PM

Heiwa,

I would like to know if you disclosed your self-labeled "restricted data" with the intent to injure the United States?

Thanks.

Boots

Well, when I made my a-bomb webpage, I had no idea about the US law making it illegal and punished by death to publish it. It was only later a visitor of my site alerted me and my legal council has later confirmed the risks/findings.

US laws and legal processes are what they are.

Quit lying.  Nobody believes you have restricted info.  Nobody believes you have been sentenced to anything.  And you DEFINITELY have not consulted legal council.

Quote from: frenat on January 28, 2017, 08:27:38 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 08:10:16 PM

It seems communicating restricted data about US a-bombs, which I do at my website, is still punished by death. Tough US laws!

you'd have to first have restricted data.  You don't.
 
IF you did, then why is your site hosted on a server in the US?

No, all of this is a fantasy made up by you to make you feel more important.  You really took it hard when your hull design was rejected, didn't you?

The restricted data are defined by US laws

The only correct thing you've posted.

 

and it appears I publish it at my website as explained above.

Still a LIE from you.  NONE of what you post is restrcted data.

It is correct that one of my ISPs is located in the USA. It was one that offered free web services 20 years ago, if it could put adverts on the pages. Today I pay $4.95 per month without ads. It works fine.

Either you deliberately missed the point or you are too thick to get it.  IF you were worried about the penalties of publishing restricted data (which you haven't done) then it would completely stupid to post it on a site hosted in the US that could be easily and legally shut down.  But it is just further proof you do NOT have any restricted data as nobody cares about the content of your site (beside you and your obsession over your paltry hit counts).

Re my hull (tanker) design I describe it 

snip shameless self-promotion and obvious fantasy and nonsense

It is clear this event was important in your life and even more clear that you don't describe it accurately because it broke you mentally when you were rejected.  More lies from Heiwa.

Quote from: Kami on January 29, 2017, 04:21:24 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:22:25 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 11:07:03 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:02:46 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:54:18 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

But clearly not restricted, which was the point.

Don't you understand? US a-bombs are propaganda. They do not work since 1945! It is a big hoax. To make it appear that they work, US produces a lot of propaganda, which is made restricted info and then they threaten people to be punished by death to discuss it.

Yeah, that makes sense. Make propaganda restricted. This is exactly what propaganda is for.

In this case extra tough! Death sentence if you argue.

Deliberate misinterpretation of the law AGAIN.  More lies from Heiwa.

Nobody believes you have restricted info and nobody believes you have consulted legal council.

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 28, 2017, 08:04:47 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 06:52:34 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 06:27:49 PM

So to be clear, this is the specific law to which you are referring? :


60 STAT .]  79TH CONG., 2D SESS .-CH. 724-AUG. 1, 1946

SEC. 10. (b) RESTRICTIONS-


(2) Whoever, lawfully or unlawfully, having possession of, access
to, control over, or being entrusted with, any document, writing,
sketch, photograph, plan, model, instrument, appliance, note or information
involving or incorporating restricted data-
(A) communicates, transmits, or discloses the same to any
individual or person, or attempts or conspires to do any of the
foregoing, with intent to injure the United States or with intent
to secure an advantage to any foreign nation, upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished by death or imprisonment for life
(but the penalty of death or imprisonment for life may be
imposed only upon recommendation of the jury and only in cases
where the offense was committed with intent to injure the United
States) ; or by a fine of not more than $20,000 or imprisonment for
not more than twenty years, or both ;
(B) communicates, transmits, or discloses the same to any
individual or person, or attempts or conspires to do any of the
foregoing, with reason to believe such data will be utilized to
injure the United States or to secure an advantage to any foreign
nation, shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more
than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or
both .
(3) Whoever, with intent to injure the United States or with intent
to secure an advantage to any foreign nation, acquires or attempts or
conspires to acquire any document, writing, sketch, photograph, plan,
model, instrument, appliance, note or information involving or incorporating
restricted data shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by death or imprisonment for life (but the penalty of death or imprisonment
for life may be imposed only upon recommendation of the
jury and only in cases where the offense was committed with intent to
injure the United States) ; or by a fine of not more than $20,000 or
imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both .

Yes. I think it is clearly indicated at my website, where I present restricted data about a-bombs.  Note 'shall be punished by death', bla, bla, bla . The law is part of the US hoax, of course.

No.  there is no restricted information on your website.  You are a liar.  No, you don't provide any evidence on your website nukes don't work.  You're a liar.  No, you are under threat of the death penalty in the us.  You are a liar.
In short, you sir, are liar.

You are wrong. My website contains restricted data. USA is not happy about the fact that its nuclear arsenal is useless and does everything to hide the fact, incl. the threat of death penalty.
Why do you get so upset about it?

No, there is no restricted data there only the ramblings of a lunatic, that's not illegal.  You are a liar.
Restricted data comes from specific classified documents, not from someone making wild unsupported claims such as yourself.  No, you do not support your claims on your website, when you claim you do you are lying.
I'm not upset at all, I'm simply making the observation that you are a proven liar.

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed. Reason is that all was fake from the start = a big hoax. Poor Niels Bohr could not explain anything when returning from USA/New Mexico and was ridiculed as a mass murder selling his knowledge to some crazy soldiers.

Evidently various info has then leaked out as part of the propaganda campaign, but it does not change the situation. Even the leaked info is restricted.

Why do you get so upset about the fact that a-bombs do not work?

You sound like the POTUS Donald Trump. He has just twittered about TORTURE! Donald thinks it works and is a good thing in the hands of the US military to question enemy soldiers, terrorists, civilians, anyone looking suspect. But there is no evidence that torture really works, e.g. when the suspect has no idea what the torturers talk about. Remember Guantanamo and GWB - 100's of detainees tortured for months = nobody being found guilty of anything. Only some female US soldiers seem to have enyoyed it. They were all queing to attend the torture sessions at Guantanamo.

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed.

That is not what the law says.  More LIES from Heiwa.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2017, 06:51:57 AM

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed.

That is not what the law says.  More LIES from Heiwa.

I think you have not understood the law. Suggest you ask your legal council before accusing people of lying.

Anyway, have you any evidence (non-restricted info) that a nuclear bomb actually works? I know there are plenty articles of a-bombs being dropped in Japan but having visited the country I didn't find any real evidence. Of course plenty towns in Japan were burnt down by napalm carpet bombings and I assume also Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed that way. I describe it at my website.
I have not found any evidence (non-restricted info) how to set off an a-bomb! Leaked info talks about sub-critical masses of fissible material that are suddenly joined or compressed together with some free neutrons in between to become one critical mass that then just FLASHES!
It doesn't sound scientific!
Same with the Stalin bomb built 1945/9. Stalin apparently used uranium mined by Wismut AG of Saxony, DDR, but it appears that Wismut AG never mined any uranium that could become fissible and used in an a-bomb. The company used old abandoned silver mines and whatever they dug up there ... it wasn't uranium.
Wismut AG (a limited company) was owned by USSR and never produced any accounts and balance sheets. The employées were in the beginning not paid anything but later got some money from somewhere. It couldn't have been from Wismut AG because Stalin/USSR never paid anything for the uranium received. Or not received. It was just a propaganda show! I describe at my website.

Actually Stalin and FDR/Truman just invented the hoax together. To scare the shit out of us. I remember it clearly.

Quote from: frenat on January 29, 2017, 06:54:43 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2017, 06:51:57 AM

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed.

That is not what the law says.  More LIES from Heiwa.

I think you have not understood the law. Suggest you ask your legal council before accusing people of lying.

Take your own advice.  It is clear you have NOT consulted legal council. I have talked to a lawyer about this and he LAUGHED at you.  I can also read.  You have not had access to restricted info.

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed. Reason is that all was fake from the start = a big hoax. Poor Niels Bohr could not explain anything when returning from USA/New Mexico and was ridiculed as a mass murder selling his knowledge to some crazy soldiers.

Evidently various info has then leaked out as part of the propaganda campaign, but it does not change the situation. Even the leaked info is restricted.

Why do you get so upset about the fact that a-bombs do not work?

You sound like the POTUS Donald Trump. He has just twittered about TORTURE! Donald thinks it works and is a good thing in the hands of the US military to question enemy soldiers, terrorists, civilians, anyone looking suspect. But there is no evidence that torture really works, e.g. when the suspect has no idea what the torturers talk about. Remember Guantanamo and GWB - 100's of detainees tortured for months = nobody being found guilty of anything. Only some female US soldiers seem to have enyoyed it. They were all queing to attend the torture sessions at Guantanamo.

No, that is not what the law says.  You are a liar.  I'm not upset about anything, but specifically you have never shown any evidence at all that nukes don't work.  Again you are simply lying.
I have asked you many many times to show your evidence, you have refused every single time.  You have been asked by many others and you have refused.  There is no evidence on your website, that's also a lie.  We can only conclude that in fact, you have no evidence and you are either a bit crazy, or a liar.

We can only conclude that in fact, you have no evidence and you are either a bit crazy, or a liar.

I'm puzzled by your use of the word 'or' there.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2017, 06:51:57 AM

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed. Reason is that all was fake from the start = a big hoax. Poor Niels Bohr could not explain anything when returning from USA/New Mexico and was ridiculed as a mass murder selling his knowledge to some crazy soldiers.

Evidently various info has then leaked out as part of the propaganda campaign, but it does not change the situation. Even the leaked info is restricted.

Why do you get so upset about the fact that a-bombs do not work?

You sound like the POTUS Donald Trump. He has just twittered about TORTURE! Donald thinks it works and is a good thing in the hands of the US military to question enemy soldiers, terrorists, civilians, anyone looking suspect. But there is no evidence that torture really works, e.g. when the suspect has no idea what the torturers talk about. Remember Guantanamo and GWB - 100's of detainees tortured for months = nobody being found guilty of anything. Only some female US soldiers seem to have enyoyed it. They were all queing to attend the torture sessions at Guantanamo.

No, that is not what the law says.  You are a liar.  I'm not upset about anything, but specifically you have never shown any evidence at all that nukes don't work.  Again you are simply lying.
I have asked you many many times to show your evidence, you have refused every single time.  You have been asked by many others and you have refused.  There is no evidence on your website, that's also a lie.  We can only conclude that in fact, you have no evidence and you are either a bit crazy, or a liar.

It seems we have different opinions about US laws. If you are right I don't have to worry about being sentenced to death for publishing restricted information. Thanks. But what about all detainées at Guantanamo not being tried for anything after years of torture, etc.

Re my website I present plenty info to the effect that nuclear weapons (US, Russian, French, UK, etc, etc) are fake. People belive the opposite because Main Stream Media, MSM, regularly trumpets that there are plenty a-bombs around, that they work and are ready to be used. Evidently there is no evidence for it. MSM just publishes Fake News or what you call it.

So I invite anyone to copy/paste what she/he considers wrong at my website and the result is zero!

To encourage people to show that I am wrong, I offer a Challenge with a €1M prize. The result is again zero!

Noone wants to collect my prize.

Explain that! Don't call me a liar, crazy and a fraud. Try to grow up! Prove your beliefs. If a-bombs work, you must possess evidence for it. Where are they? 

I assume you have none.

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed.

Can you please cite the specific law which states this?

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2017, 06:51:57 AM

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed.

Can you please cite the specific law which states this?

See post #2292 and http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm#USA .

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 29, 2017, 08:03:32 AM

We can only conclude that in fact, you have no evidence and you are either a bit crazy, or a liar.

I'm puzzled by your use of the word 'or' there.

While they are not mutually exclusive I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 29, 2017, 08:03:32 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2017, 06:51:57 AM

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed. Reason is that all was fake from the start = a big hoax. Poor Niels Bohr could not explain anything when returning from USA/New Mexico and was ridiculed as a mass murder selling his knowledge to some crazy soldiers.

Evidently various info has then leaked out as part of the propaganda campaign, but it does not change the situation. Even the leaked info is restricted.

Why do you get so upset about the fact that a-bombs do not work?

You sound like the POTUS Donald Trump. He has just twittered about TORTURE! Donald thinks it works and is a good thing in the hands of the US military to question enemy soldiers, terrorists, civilians, anyone looking suspect. But there is no evidence that torture really works, e.g. when the suspect has no idea what the torturers talk about. Remember Guantanamo and GWB - 100's of detainees tortured for months = nobody being found guilty of anything. Only some female US soldiers seem to have enyoyed it. They were all queing to attend the torture sessions at Guantanamo.

No, that is not what the law says.  You are a liar.  I'm not upset about anything, but specifically you have never shown any evidence at all that nukes don't work.  Again you are simply lying.
I have asked you many many times to show your evidence, you have refused every single time.  You have been asked by many others and you have refused.  There is no evidence on your website, that's also a lie.  We can only conclude that in fact, you have no evidence and you are either a bit crazy, or a liar.

It seems we have different opinions about US laws. If you are right I don't have to worry about being sentenced to death for publishing restricted information. Thanks. But what about all detainées at Guantanamo not being tried for anything after years of torture, etc.

Re my website I present plenty info to the effect that nuclear weapons (US, Russian, French, UK, etc, etc) are fake. People belive the opposite because Main Stream Media, MSM, regularly trumpets that there are plenty a-bombs around, that they work and are ready to be used. Evidently there is no evidence for it. MSM just publishes Fake News or what you call it.

So I invite anyone to copy/paste what she/he considers wrong at my website and the result is zero!

To encourage people to show that I am wrong, I offer a Challenge with a €1M prize. The result is again zero!

Noone wants to collect my prize.

Explain that! Don't call me a liar, crazy and a fraud. Try to grow up! Prove your beliefs. If a-bombs work, you must possess evidence for it. Where are they? 

I assume you have none.

Not sure what gitmo has to do with anything.  I called you a liar because you claim to be under a death sentence, that's a lie.  I called you a liar because you claim to have restricted material on your website, that's a lie.  I called you a liar because you claim to show evidence on your website that nukes don't work and it's all propaganda.  There is no such evidence, that's a lie.
Now if you would care to support any of these claims you make with actual facts and evidence I will gladly apologize.
All you have to do is copy and paste the actual evidence from your website to this thread.  Should be easy for you.  Just any section at all with actual proof of any of the things you claimed that I called a lie.
Or accept the fact that you are indeed a liar.  Or, you know delusional, or both.

Quote from: Boots on January 29, 2017, 08:59:30 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2017, 06:51:57 AM

You must read the law. All info about US nuclear weapons is restricted from the beginning 1945. Nothing could be discussed.

Can you please cite the specific law which states this?

See post #2292 and http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm#USA .

Nothing but links to your website again. I have already posted the referenced laws right in this thread. Those laws prohibit disclosure of restricted information.

I want to see where restricted information is defined as "All info about US nuclear weapons."

You're the one making that claim. You must be basing it on something. Can you please provide the law defining restricted information as  "All info about US nuclear weapons?"

I want to see where restricted information is defined as "All info about US nuclear weapons."

You're the one making that claim. You must be basing it on something. Can you please provide the law defining restricted information as  "All info about US nuclear weapons?"

You really should consult your legal council. IMO the law is clear. Everything about US nuclear weapons became restricted information 1946 and, if anything has become non-restricted later is beyond me. Reason is of course that everything was just pseudoscience nonsense invented by Oppenheimer, Bohr & Co 1942/5.

Quote from: Boots on January 29, 2017, 09:39:57 AM

I want to see where restricted information is defined as "All info about US nuclear weapons."

You're the one making that claim. You must be basing it on something. Can you please provide the law defining restricted information as  "All info about US nuclear weapons?"

You really should consult your legal council. IMO the law is clear. Everything about US nuclear weapons became restricted information 1946 and, if anything has become non-restricted later is beyond me. Reason is of course that everything was just pseudoscience nonsense invented by Oppenheimer, Bohr & Co 1942/5.

Take your own advice.  It is abundantly clear you have not.

Quote from: Kami on January 29, 2017, 04:21:24 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:22:25 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 11:07:03 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 11:02:46 PM

Quote from: Boots on January 28, 2017, 08:54:18 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 28, 2017, 07:22:54 PM

Hm, all information about US a-bombs are restricted data.

Some de-classified documents about nuclear weapons:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb555-Bikini-A-Bomb-Test-1946-Turned-Ships-into-Radioactive-Stoves/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb575-Reagan-Nuclear-War-Briefing/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb574-Presidents-Daily-Brief-excerpts-on-Soviet-missile-and-space-programs/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB571-Nunn-Lugar-25th-Anniversary/

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb541-Nukes-on-Okinawa-Declassified-2016/

And many more here

Yes, I know! Just fake propaganda though. A-bombs do not work so you need a lot of propaganda to the contratry to keep the show going.

But clearly not restricted, which was the point.

Don't you understand? US a-bombs are propaganda. They do not work since 1945! It is a big hoax. To make it appear that they work, US produces a lot of propaganda, which is made restricted info and then they threaten people to be punished by death to discuss it.

Yeah, that makes sense. Make propaganda restricted. This is exactly what propaganda is for.

In this case extra tough! Death sentence if you argue.

No.  Death sentence if you intend harm against the USA.  Do you intend harm against the USA?