I see you could not use the videos presented to support a heliocentric model. Duly noted.
Just like you cannot honestly use them to support a flat, stationary Earth.
The videos tell you nothing either way.
I set it that way because I know earth's physical condition, earth's physical nature, will tell us which idea is correct. I used those two videos to support a motionless plane, of which none of you could disprove my claim, nor can you use the two videos to support a heliocentric model. The heliocentric model is cooked, fried to a crisp. Not by me, but by earth's nature itself, the ultimate litmus test, the ultimate.
And Earth's physical condition tells us it is a ball that is rotating slowly. Too slowly to be perceived by man, and too large a ball to directly see the curve.
Those videos do not support a motionless plane any more than they support a slowly rotating giant sphere.
You cannot prove your claim so we don't have to disprove it.
I also notice you cannot use the plane to prove the plane is moving.
Like I said, use the video I provided to prove the plane is in motion using nothing but the plane, nothing outside the plane and no instruments on the plane.
If you can't do that, you cannot honestly claim your videos prove Earth is stationary.
I already pointed out your video shows a curved horizon, so either the error is too great to show that Earth is flat or curved, or it shows that Earth isn't flat.