I honestly want to know if REs are welcome here only if they want to hear the flat earth theories, are they here to provide argument, or would it be better if there were no REs here.
Don't listen to Googleotomy, he's probably the dumbest RE on this forum.
As boydster says, all earth shape believers are welcome here. You should definitely feel free to argue your points. This is what debate is all about. This forum is what you make it. If you use the debates to increase your own knowledge, then isn't that a good thing?
Most RE make the mistake of thinking we're trying to change their minds. Or they come here with the mission of changing ours. You should only be concerned with changing your own mind by increasing your own knowledge of how the world works. Also, you are welcome to get to know people, and have some fun in the lower forums.
It is appropriate to answer questions when presented and issues of FE "horizon" can be answered.
"What you see is what you get" (Zetetic). This does answer all three questions. What we do know is there are anomalies within the atmoplane that disturbs any chance of a standardized response to issues relating to what REers call the "horizon". Motions of the sun viewed through the atmoplane provides for unlimited variations of what we are seeing.
Measurements within the atmoplane get foggy past a given distance depending on the disturbances within.
Measurements within the atmoplane get foggy past a given distance depending on the disturbances within.
Measurements within the atmoplane get foggy past a given distance depending on the disturbances within.
I will excuse this flat earther view as maybe no flat earthers have ever been to sea and observed the horizon from a ship when you're in the middle of the ocean on a clear calm day.
I will excuse this flat earther view as maybe no flat earthers have ever been to sea and observed the horizon from a ship when you're in the middle of the ocean on a clear calm day.
What is the closest you have been to this horizon?
About 2.6 km from an ocean horizon.
I will excuse this flat earther view as maybe no flat earthers have ever been to sea and observed the horizon from a ship when you're in the middle of the ocean on a clear calm day.
What is the closest you have been to this horizon?
rabinoz is winning.
Who's been closer?
rabinoz is winning.I guess that when snorkeling with a mask on I've viewed the very close horizon from eye-ball height above the water level.
Who's been closer?
Has anyone, say Googlectomy for instance, estimated the distance to the horizon from the crow's nest of a square rigger and then sailed there and found the horizon?
Measurements within the atmoplane get foggy past a given distance depending on the disturbances within.
Measurements within the atmoplane get foggy past a given distance depending on the disturbances within.
It takes a serious cognitive dysfunction to say something like this and actually believe yourself.
I will alert others I know personally (and who agree with my statement) that round Earth believers still doubt our claims. These FEers include a geologist, a metallurgist, a law professor, a Native American Indian Chief, a hospital administrator, a poet, and a Holy man.So?
I hope to add a psychologist to the list before too long...
And yet it moves . . . . (Italian: E pur si muove . . . . )
is a phrase attributed to the Italian mathematician, physicist and philosopher Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) in 1633 after being forced to recant his claims that the Earth moves around the immovable Sun rather than the converse during the Galileo affair.
(https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/thumbnails/image/dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif?itok=m-pCEXqi) This animation features actual satellite images of the far side of the moon, illuminated by the sun, as it crosses between the DSCOVR spacecraft's Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC), and the Earth - one million miles away. Credits: NASA/NOAA |
I will alert others I know personally (and who agree with my statement) that round Earth believers still doubt our claims. These FEers include a geologist, a metallurgist, a law professor, a Native American Indian Chief, a hospital administrator, a poet, and a Holy man.So?
I hope to add a psychologist to the list before too long...
These "authorities" you are appealing to include "a metallurgist, a law professor, a Native American Indian Chief, a hospital administrator, a poet, a Holy man" and possibly "a psychologist".
And why would any of those be "authorities" on the shape and movement of the earth.
I will excuse this flat earther view as maybe no flat earthers have ever been to sea and observed the horizon from a ship when you're in the middle of the ocean on a clear calm day.
What is the closest you have been to this horizon?
I honestly want to know if REs are welcome here only if they want to hear the flat earth theories, are they here to provide argument, or would it be better if there were no REs here.The genuine reality should be globe Earth believers coming here to question the alternatives as well as seriously questioning their own indoctrinated global schooling from mainstream so called experts.